LDVideo: Mark Pack gets Paxo’d over the autumn statement

Voice co-editor Mark Pack made his debut on Newsnight’s political panel last night, discussing the politics of the autumn statement. You can watch his thoughts below, or on YouTube here.

* Nick Thornsby is a day editor at Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Did Mark Pack really think the Lords were going to vote on the Autumn Statement?

  • But surely the Lords won’t vote on it, as it’s a money bill?

  • Richard Dean 6th Dec '12 - 10:40pm

    I think Mark definitely passed the Paxo test. Survived with dignity, and got some good points across. Well done!

  • Malcolm Todd 6th Dec '12 - 11:36pm

    I don’t think welfare bills are classed as “money bills” — I think that just refers to measures for raising money rather than spending it.

  • Malcolm Todd 6th Dec '12 - 11:38pm

    In fact, having posted that, I thought “Don’t be so lazy” and went and looked it up:
    “A Money Bill is a Bill that deals with national taxation, public money or loans and their management. It is only considered to be a Money Bill if the Speaker of the House of Commons agrees that it is. The Speaker signs a certificate to indicate this. The most important Money Bills are those that deal with taxation bills or the Consolidated Fund Bills that formally vote money to the government.”

    So, yes I think the Lords will get a vote (especially as it’s up to Speaker Berkow to decide whether to give it a free ride!).

  • “A Money Bill is a Bill that deals with national taxation, public money or loans …”

    It would deal with “public money”, wouldn’t it? More specifically “the appropriation, receipt, custody, issue or audit of accounts of public money” (my emphasis):
    http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/p05.pdf

    We’ll see, but I wonder if Osborne is really so wise to emphasise the fact that the measures in this statement primarily penalise those on the lowest incomes. It’s certainly not much help to the Lib Dem narrative about the raising of the tax threshold.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAndrew Toye 27th Apr - 11:54am
    In introducing the 2 child policy, the Tories asked poorer people to consider whether they could afford to bring up a large family, and was...
  • User AvatarAshley Cartman 27th Apr - 11:46am
    "Liberal Democrats across the country are challenging Theresa May’s Conservative Brexit government" - I think that sums it up nicely. The Conservatives will undoubtedly win...
  • User AvatarYeovil Yokel 27th Apr - 11:32am
    There is a wider strategic benefit to be gained by both parties from this move, although it will no doubt hurt LD activists in Brighton....
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 27th Apr - 11:25am
    Oops - obviously the Remain campaign has "consistently opposed leaving the EU", though most are also quite partial to the UK :-)
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 27th Apr - 11:23am
    @Arnold Kiel "Brexit beneficiaries are ..." But which of those have not also benefited from and prospered under the UK's membership of the EU? As...
  • User AvatarCllr Mark Wright 27th Apr - 11:09am
    Good - I think this is fair payback for Richmond. It will also force the Green Party to put up, or shut up, on further...