LDVideo: Mark Pack gets Paxo’d over the autumn statement

Voice co-editor Mark Pack made his debut on Newsnight’s political panel last night, discussing the politics of the autumn statement. You can watch his thoughts below, or on YouTube here.

* Nick Thornsby is Thursday Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs here.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31985 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Did Mark Pack really think the Lords were going to vote on the Autumn Statement?

  • But surely the Lords won’t vote on it, as it’s a money bill?

  • Richard Dean 6th Dec '12 - 10:40pm

    I think Mark definitely passed the Paxo test. Survived with dignity, and got some good points across. Well done!

  • Malcolm Todd 6th Dec '12 - 11:36pm

    I don’t think welfare bills are classed as “money bills” — I think that just refers to measures for raising money rather than spending it.

  • Malcolm Todd 6th Dec '12 - 11:38pm

    In fact, having posted that, I thought “Don’t be so lazy” and went and looked it up:
    “A Money Bill is a Bill that deals with national taxation, public money or loans and their management. It is only considered to be a Money Bill if the Speaker of the House of Commons agrees that it is. The Speaker signs a certificate to indicate this. The most important Money Bills are those that deal with taxation bills or the Consolidated Fund Bills that formally vote money to the government.”

    So, yes I think the Lords will get a vote (especially as it’s up to Speaker Berkow to decide whether to give it a free ride!).

  • “A Money Bill is a Bill that deals with national taxation, public money or loans …”

    It would deal with “public money”, wouldn’t it? More specifically “the appropriation, receipt, custody, issue or audit of accounts of public money” (my emphasis):
    http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/p05.pdf

    We’ll see, but I wonder if Osborne is really so wise to emphasise the fact that the measures in this statement primarily penalise those on the lowest incomes. It’s certainly not much help to the Lib Dem narrative about the raising of the tax threshold.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlistair 30th Aug - 1:39am
    The last time I saw a woman getting hassled on a train it was by a rail employee - Southern Rail. Happy to report I...
  • User AvatarMBoy 30th Aug - 12:43am
    @Malcolm, are you equating having your bum/groin squeezed with having your nose broken? I've had both, and let me tell you there is no comparison.
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 30th Aug - 12:30am
    It's pretty obvious that most folk on here are pretty brassed off with Clegg's Lavender List (see Harold Wilson 1976) which has a dash of...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 30th Aug - 12:24am
    "if trains are safe for women they will also be safe for men" Indeed. Sadly the reverse is not necessarily true. That's why this is...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 30th Aug - 12:11am
    "More men are assaulted on trains than women." Are you sure about that, MBoy? Assaults on men are, I would guess, overwhelmingly openly violent assaults...
  • User AvatarChris_sh 30th Aug - 12:03am
    @Mike Drew "whenever we are challenged on gender balance and BME representation that we support STV for all elections which will produce automatically better balance."...