LDVideo: Mark Pack gets Paxo’d over the autumn statement

Voice co-editor Mark Pack made his debut on Newsnight’s political panel last night, discussing the politics of the autumn statement. You can watch his thoughts below, or on YouTube here.

* Nick Thornsby is a day editor at Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Did Mark Pack really think the Lords were going to vote on the Autumn Statement?

  • But surely the Lords won’t vote on it, as it’s a money bill?

  • Richard Dean 6th Dec '12 - 10:40pm

    I think Mark definitely passed the Paxo test. Survived with dignity, and got some good points across. Well done!

  • Malcolm Todd 6th Dec '12 - 11:36pm

    I don’t think welfare bills are classed as “money bills” — I think that just refers to measures for raising money rather than spending it.

  • Malcolm Todd 6th Dec '12 - 11:38pm

    In fact, having posted that, I thought “Don’t be so lazy” and went and looked it up:
    “A Money Bill is a Bill that deals with national taxation, public money or loans and their management. It is only considered to be a Money Bill if the Speaker of the House of Commons agrees that it is. The Speaker signs a certificate to indicate this. The most important Money Bills are those that deal with taxation bills or the Consolidated Fund Bills that formally vote money to the government.”

    So, yes I think the Lords will get a vote (especially as it’s up to Speaker Berkow to decide whether to give it a free ride!).

  • “A Money Bill is a Bill that deals with national taxation, public money or loans …”

    It would deal with “public money”, wouldn’t it? More specifically “the appropriation, receipt, custody, issue or audit of accounts of public money” (my emphasis):
    http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/p05.pdf

    We’ll see, but I wonder if Osborne is really so wise to emphasise the fact that the measures in this statement primarily penalise those on the lowest incomes. It’s certainly not much help to the Lib Dem narrative about the raising of the tax threshold.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 25th Jun - 4:27pm
    David Allen To the Coalition enthusiasts on this thread – What would you say to a Lib Dem coalition with Labour? Would it be (a)...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 25th Jun - 4:21pm
    paul holmes Matthew. The Liberal Party had none of the ‘DUP advantages’ you refer to in Feb 1974 but they refused to go into a...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 25th Jun - 4:05pm
    FYI Theres an interesting article in The Times, quoted on The Political Betting site & suggesting that Tory plotters plan to replace May with a...
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 25th Jun - 3:57pm
    William Ross "the fact that Le Pen plus spoiled ballots was a higher vote total than Macron in the second round" You seem to have...
  • User AvatarPeter Brand 25th Jun - 3:48pm
    I agree these are the two areas to look at. I agree that such changes of policy need to be implemented only in a new...
  • User AvatarManfarang 25th Jun - 3:48pm
    Dave Orbison Yes things have changed. East Asia is the economic powerhouse now. Countries such as Burma have thrown off socialist policies that brought them...
Sat 1st Jul 2017