LDVideo: The sage of Twickenham returns

During the financial crisis and subsequent recession it was rare to go a weekend without Vince Cable making an appearance on our television screens to share his thoughts on the latest piece of economic news. Since entering government as the coalition’s business secretary, though, he has kept his wider economic analysis more-or-less to himself, concentrating instead on the important task of running his department.

However, yesterday Vince took part in a talk at the Guardian Open Weekend, in conversation with Observer columnist Will Hutton, where he shared his thoughts on the economic recovery, the future of the banking system and – perhaps most interestingly – on changing the focus of the Bank of England. Here are the highlights, courtesy of the Guardian:

* Nick Thornsby is Thursday Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs here.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in YouTube.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Bill le Breton 26th Mar '12 - 9:39am

    Geoffrey, this is actually an historic interview. He was asked directly whether he favoured NGDP tagetting and he said, “For it” and then commented that the economic logic for it was ‘impessable’.
    He is now the first cabinet minister in favour. Next Clegg? Next Alexander and Next Davey? This needs to be a Lib Dem campaign.
    Of course the issue now is what that target should be.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTony Greaves 5th Feb - 10:05pm
    No-one has yet answered the underlying practical question posed. We have no safe seats to guarantee automatic election. At the next election we will have...
  • User AvatarRoland 5th Feb - 9:54pm
    I do get the distinct impression that UKIP are once again leading the 'debate', it is unfortunate that many in other parties seem to act...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 5th Feb - 9:44pm
    @nvelope2003 "Why is this ?" A relatively small number of by-elections is unlikely to be a representative sample. More significantly, Lib Dems are not standing...
  • User AvatarWilliam Summers 5th Feb - 9:40pm
    It is ridiculous in my view to (theoretically) promote a privileged woman with, say, a highly paid job and a private education over a man...
  • User AvatarIan Swales 5th Feb - 9:30pm
    Louise, I think you're right about the voters - that they tend not to be biased. You also say "However Lib Dem local parties can...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 5th Feb - 9:12pm
    Genuine question here. If we go for AWSs, someone will have to decide which winnable seats they will apply to. It'll certainly affect areas where...