Legal firm runs into trouble over its election rules

Legal Week reports:

Clifford Chance (CC) is set to repeat the first round of its senior partner elections due to a glitch in the firm’s partnership deed.

The unexpected voting re-run has arisen because the magic circle firm’s partnership deed does not state that the contender receiving the least amount of votes in the first round is obliged to withdraw from the race.

All three partners in the running – London finance partner Malcolm Sweeting, German corporate finance partner Daniela Weber-Rey and City tax partner Jonathan Elman – were all asked to reconsider their position after last week’s stalemate, but none chose to stand down.

The firm is now set to repeat the first round of voting with all three candidates still in the running, after which it is expected that at least one candidate will be eliminated.

You can read the full story here.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/21960 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 21st Oct - 9:15am
    Hi Cara, thanks for your reply. The problem with GAAR was that rather than get rid of the loop-holes that already existed the government lazily...
  • User Avatarsimon 21st Oct - 9:08am
    Coming back to that Lord Ashcroft poll I mentioned last night (as I say it may be referred to on here, so this is the...
  • User AvatarDaniel Jones 21st Oct - 8:56am
    The author appears to have either confused/conflated tax avoidance and tax evasion, or is frankly illiberal in desiring to legally punish people for legal activity....
  • User AvatarGeoffrey Payne 21st Oct - 8:47am
    Conference voted 95% against secret courts so this change would have no effect on that. One thing I would warn against is direct democracy. The...
  • User AvatarJohn Critchley 21st Oct - 8:43am
    Cara, I agree that this is an issue that has to be dealt with and that international agreement is necessary. Are politicians tough enough to...
  • User Avatarsimon 21st Oct - 8:41am
    "I would be concerned if the British Government were allowed to do it on their own " If you want a summary of quite how...