Legal firm runs into trouble over its election rules

Legal Week reports:

Clifford Chance (CC) is set to repeat the first round of its senior partner elections due to a glitch in the firm’s partnership deed.

The unexpected voting re-run has arisen because the magic circle firm’s partnership deed does not state that the contender receiving the least amount of votes in the first round is obliged to withdraw from the race.

All three partners in the running – London finance partner Malcolm Sweeting, German corporate finance partner Daniela Weber-Rey and City tax partner Jonathan Elman – were all asked to reconsider their position after last week’s stalemate, but none chose to stand down.

The firm is now set to repeat the first round of voting with all three candidates still in the running, after which it is expected that at least one candidate will be eliminated.

You can read the full story here.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/21960 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Watson 20th Aug - 1:29pm
    Perhaps "retrospective" is not the correct term, but in this debate it is understood to mean that the Coalition's bedroom tax penalises people who have...
  • User AvatarSuzanne Fletcher 20th Aug - 1:24pm
    thank you for a thoughtful article,. good points. I am part way through Leaf Fielding's "To live outside the law". Prison didn't seem to do...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 20th Aug - 1:16pm
    @Peter Watson That's quite correct and it was exactly the same under Labour's Student Finance system. For example one of my daughters went to university...
  • User AvatarDave Page 20th Aug - 1:09pm
    Caron: We have links with the pink press we can use to promote this further; it'd be an excellent thing to use as a petition...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 20th Aug - 1:07pm
    @Peter Watson "I believe that matt meant “retrospective” rather than “immediate”, a point made explicitly by Mack (not a Lib Dem)" Do you actually know...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 20th Aug - 12:59pm
    @Stuart "Simon Shaw - 'Incorrect. Not only does Labour’s Bedroom Tax apply to all private sector tenants' Strange, as the first three random sources I’ve...