Legal firm runs into trouble over its election rules

Legal Week reports:

Clifford Chance (CC) is set to repeat the first round of its senior partner elections due to a glitch in the firm’s partnership deed.

The unexpected voting re-run has arisen because the magic circle firm’s partnership deed does not state that the contender receiving the least amount of votes in the first round is obliged to withdraw from the race.

All three partners in the running – London finance partner Malcolm Sweeting, German corporate finance partner Daniela Weber-Rey and City tax partner Jonathan Elman – were all asked to reconsider their position after last week’s stalemate, but none chose to stand down.

The firm is now set to repeat the first round of voting with all three candidates still in the running, after which it is expected that at least one candidate will be eliminated.

You can read the full story here.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/21960 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Jan - 2:03am
    Glenn, I would say the basic rate of income tax is a better indicator of public willingness to pay - and governments' interpretation of that...
  • User AvatarAdrian PR 30th Jan - 1:57am
    In response to Stephen Johnson: This isn't really what you want, but the Legislative Council in Victoria (Australia) has used a form of STV with...
  • User AvatarAdrian PR 30th Jan - 1:54am
    Anthony Tuffin writes: > Adrian PR repeated an old fallacy, “STV is not very [party] proportional, just “proportional enough”.” Leaving aside the other parts of...
  • User AvatarT-J 30th Jan - 1:52am
    On the subject of the article, I totally agree. Individual voter registration just makes more sense, at least to my idea that the individual constitutes...
  • User AvatarJohn Lister 30th Jan - 1:39am
    It's by no means perfectly proportional, but I like the two-birds-with-one-stone idea of replacing the House of Lords with a chamber made up of the...
  • User AvatarTim Hill 30th Jan - 1:16am
    I wouldn't get so annoyed if the moaners and whingers didn't sound as though they will be so pleased if the Party did actually lose...