Lib Dem Voice polled our members-only forum recently to discover what Lib Dem members think of various political issues, the Coalition, and the performance of key party figures. Some 650 party members have responded, and we’re publishing the full results.
(All comparisons are with our most recent survey conducted in December 2012.)
58% of member say party on “right course”
Do you think, as a whole, the Liberal Democrats are on the right course or on the wrong track?
58% (-3%) – The right course
33% (n/c) – The wrong track
9% (+3%) – Don’t know / No opinion
It’s been a dramatic few weeks for the party: from the highs of the Eastleigh by-election win to the lows of the internal row over secret courts. It has had little effect on the overall views of whether the party is on the right course or wrong track, though: a net +25% of members say it’s on the right course.
Nick Clegg’s personal ratings negative for only the second time
What is your view of Nick Clegg’s performance as Lib Dem leader?
9% – Very satisfied
39% – Satisfied
Total satisfied = 48% (-10%)
26% – Dissatisfied
24% – Very dissatisfied
Total dissatisfied = 50% (+9%)
2% – Don’t know / No opinion
While satisfaction with the party may be largely unchanged, the same isn’t true of Nick Clegg’s personal ratings as Lib Dem leader. In December, his net rating stood at +17%. It has now declined to -2%, the same level as in September 2012. In particular, judging from the comments, Nick’s ratings have been hit by the internal row over ‘secret courts’ — as much his perceived mis-handling of party discontent as his support for them.
78% of Lib Dem members continue to back the Coalition with the Conservatives
Do you support or oppose the Lib Dems being in the Coalition Government with the Conservatives?
78% (+1%) – Support
18% (n/c) – Oppose
4% (-1%) – Don’t know / No opinion
Whatever misgivings party members have about Nick’s recent performance, there is still remarkably strong support (all things considered) for sticking with the Coalition with the Conservatives: 78% of members continue to back the arrangement. Throughout the course of the Coalition, this figure has remained consistently high, with close on 4-in-5 members backing the Coalition. Opposition to it remains relatively low, at 18%.
Net +14% of Lib Dems back Coalition Government’s record
Do you approve or disapprove of the Coalition Government’s record to date?
52% (-1%) – Approve
38% (-1%) – Disapprove
10% (+2%) – Don’t know / No opinion
While support for the principle of being in Coalition remains high, approval of its practise is less so: just over half (52%) approve of the Government’s record to date. The net approval figure of +14% is less than half what it was a year ago: in March 2012 it stood at +32%.
56% expect party to get at least 40 MPs elected in 2015
How many Lib Dem MPs do you think will be elected at the next general election (expected in May 2015)?
7% – More than current 57 MPs
21% – Between 50 and 57 MPs
28% – Between 40 and 49 MPs
25% – Between 30 and 40 MPs
13% – Fewer than 30 MPs
6% – Don’t know
This is the first time we’ve asked this particular question (which replaces the more generic: do you think the result of the next election will be good, bad or indifferent for the party?) so there’s no comparisons. Overall — and perhaps buoyed by the Eastleigh hold — party members take a relatively optimistic attitude, with a majority (56%) predicting the party will hold at least 40 seats after the next general election, considerably more than our current poll ratings would indicate. A significant minority (38%), however, predict a worse fate.
85% EXPECT the Coalition to last ’til 2015…
How long do you expect the coalition government will last?
1% (-2%) – It will end in 2013
12% (-3%) – It will end in 2014
85% (+5%) – It will last the full term, until 2015
2% (n/c) – Don’t know / No opinion
Unsurprisingly, given neither Coalition party is riding high in the polls, there is a heavy expectation that the Coalition will last its full-term.
…and 76% WANT it to last ’til 2015
When would you like the Coalition to end?
11% (n/c) – As soon as possible
2% (-3%) – It should end some time later in 2013
10% (-2%) – It should end in 2014
37% (-1%) – It should stop shortly before the 2015 general election so the two Coalition parties can set out their different plans
36% (+6%) – It should continue right up to the 2015 general election
3% (-1%) – It should continue beyond the 2015 general election
1% (n/c) – Don’t know / No opinion
As you might expect, given the strong continuing overall support for sticking with the Coalition, more than three-quarters (76%) of party members actively want the Coalition to last well into 2015 — though there is a pretty even division on whether it should continue right up to the dissolution of parliament, or cease a decent interval beforehand to allow for full-on differentiation. Interestingly, though opposition to the Coalition stands at 18% according to our survey (see above), just 11% actually ant the Coalition to come to an immediate end.
Clear majority say Lib Dems achieving influence in Government
How would you rate the extent of the Liberal Democrat influence within the Coalition Government, where 10 is highly influential, and 1 indicates no influence.
1 = 1%
2 = 7%
3 = 13%
4 = 11%
5 = 10%
Lacking influence = 42% (-8%)
6 = 20%
7 = 23%
8 = 11%
9 = 2%
10 = 1%
Achieving influence = 57% (+8%)
Well over half (57%) Lib Dem members rate the impact the party is having within the Coalition at 6 or more out of 10; a chunky minority (42%) disagree. The graph below shows the distribution:
Here’s a sample of your views on the questions above:
First time I have answered “wrong track” here. The secret courts debacle has damaged my faith that we know what we’re doing. When “no majority in the House of Commons” is used an excuse for us NOT to vote in line with our core principles, then something has gone very wrong with the way our Parliamentarians are whipped.
The disconnect between members and MPs is worrying.
I would like to hear a more independent voice; despite party efforts, our message is still being muffled by being part of the Coalition and we are being blamed for Coalition decisions that we cannot control.
Secret courts – need I say more? I thought we were a liberal party.
Bright spots (and there are plenty) aside, we’ve made major strategic errors of late.
we need better communication between the leadership and the membership, so that we can undertand what is being done and why. the leadership need to listen to the members and reflect their wishes in their actions.
We did the right thing for the country going into coalition when the country was in financial crisis. Long term that will be good for the party as well.
Lots of good things are happening in government. Some bad things too, but generally we are doing right.
We needed to demonstrate in 2010 that we could be taken seriously as a party of Government, there was no other choice other than joining the Tories, and we need to stay in the Coalition till the end to show the benefits of having Lib Dems in Government
Broadly the right course, but it needs some modification.
Satisfied for now…but he needs to be bolder against the Tories and show greater willingness to listen and act according to the wishes of the LibDem grassroots.
Very angry about the leadership position on secret courts – in particular the failure to offer a credible defence or explanation for this illiberal policy while ignoring the concerns of the membership.
The Orange Book domination of the leadership and policies is the problem, not Clegg only.
Cool under fire, incredibly difficult circumstances. Not perfect but we should be proud of his overall performance.
Nick needs to carry on shouting about THE differences between us and the Cons
He has been assailed by a hugely illiberal press but has maintained his sense of proportion. There was no choice but to go into coalition with the Conservatives but Nick was too naive at the beginning. since then the Conservatives have shown themselves to be offensively right wing – it is a party that is absolutely in tune with Enoch Powell’s 1968 positions, for which he was expelled from the Shadow Cabinet by Ted Heath – and has latterly taken a much more realistic position within the coaliton. His instincts are Liberal.
He is the least bad option. Distinct lack of proud liberal statesmanship, however.
Needs to listen to party membership more closely on some issues e.g. secret courts not supported by the membership
I was very satisfied but the secret courts screw up has certainly made me downgrade him.
He’s the best leader we could have right now
Too interested in staying in power
More evidence of him listening to party members would be good. The British people need a senior politician who can demonstrate that he is aware of their opinions.
He’s wrong on secret courts.
He’s got a pretty hard task – steering us through coalition when our ‘partners’ hate to have LD put a check on their policies.
Old saw: don’t judge a man until you’ve walked a mile in his moccassins.
Glad he is distancing himself from many right-wing attitudes.
He’s made some bad mistakes but I admire his courage and determination to see the job through. I voted for Chris Huhne (twice!) Thank heavens I didn’t get my way!
Nick drank from the poisoned chalice that was the last set of election results. Nothing he did was going to be right for everyone and I think he’s managed coalition better than the media give him/us credit for.
Nick has done many good things but his attitude towards secret courts, health, education and his appalling handling of the tuition fees affair has done untold damage to the party.
I think Nick Clegg will always be an electoral liability. Too much past baggage hanging around him, and not enough emphasis on establishing influence of LibDems on Govt policy.
Clegg is beginning to learn about handling a coalition but late, late, late.
* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and editor of the 2013 publication, The Coalition and Beyond: Liberal Reforms for the Decade Ahead. He is also a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum and writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.