Catherine Bearder MEP writes… Lib Dem MEPs kill ACTA

After careful consideration, Lib Dem MEPs have decided to reject the controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) in the European Parliament. There is now a majority in the Parliament that will reject the ratification of this plurilateral treaty originally designed to establish international standards for intellectual property rights.

So why do we reject ACTA?

In principle, Lib Dems support the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) and the fight against counterfeiting – in particular when it comes to dangerous counterfeit medicines, electronics and toys. But we are also champions of fundamental rights and freedoms and we must weigh up carefully between the need to protect property rights and our knowledge-based economy and these fundamental freedoms.

ACTA falls short in both regards. On the one hand, it is ‘an anti-counterfeiting agreement without the counterfeiters’ as countries such as China, which is a major source of counterfeit products, have not signed up to it. This undermines the entire creditability of ACTA and demonstrates that it cannot achieve its aim to combat global counterfeiting. At the same time, ACTA poses serious risks to the fundamental rights of people in the UK and EU in its provisions on digital goods and obligations on internet service providers. Only this week, the European Data Protection Supervisor said that ACTA would allow ‘indiscriminate or widespread monitoring’ of internet users which are ‘disproportionate’ while not providing sufficient safeguards. Approving such legislation would be against the fundamental civil liberties principles of the Liberal Democrats and we have therefore decided to reject ACTA.

What now?

Without the support of the Liberal and Democrat Group (ALDE) in the European Parliament, ACTA is dead in the water. But we need to get back to the drawing board to find a more suitable multilateral solution to protect IPRs and safeguard consumers from harmful products.

ACTA bundles together too many different types of IPR enforcement under the same umbrella which undermines the protection of each. We want to see a sectoral approach with each separate agreement focusing on a specific type of IPR infringement. And we want to see emerging economies (which are the major source of counterfeit products) brought to the negotiating table, if possible within the framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). Most of all, we want any new negotiations to be conducted in a very transparent manner to ensure that fundamental freedoms and civil liberties are not disproportionately infringed by any new agreements.

* Catherine Bearder is the Liberal Democrat MEP for the South East

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News and Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/28265 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Alex Macfie 27th Apr '12 - 9:23am

    This is excellent news. However, it isn’t over until the vote, and with the weak party discipline of the European Parliament a majority on paper does not guarantee a win. Last time the European Parliament voted on ACTA, in a symbolic vote in Autumn 2010, a pro-ACTA resolution (supported by the right-wing groups) was passed despite the centre and left groups supporting a rival anti-ACTA resolution and forming a majority in pariament, because of a few rebels from the ALDE and S&D group. Regrettably these included some UK Lib Dem MEPs, as well as all UK Labour MEPs.

  • @Alex: your concerns are justified and we will have to wait till the vote in July to be 100% sure. However, I thinkt there is room for confidence since the situation is fundamentally different to the situation in Autumn 2010. This time the Greens, Communists, Socialists, Liberal Democrats and the EFD (UKIP’s political group) are opposed. Added to this, Most Eastern and Central European delegations in the conservatiive EPP Group are opposed, as well as the Tories’ Polish allies. The major difference to 2010 is that a whole swathe of EU governments are now either opposed to the agreement, hesitating or asking for exemptions from ACTA, these include Germany, Bulgaria, Poland, Czech Republic, Latvia, Slovenia and Romania. In such circumstances, it is very unlikely to rise from the dead.

  • Alex, do you mean this vote: http://www.votewatch.eu/cx_vote_details.php?order_by=euro_grup_cod&order=ASC&last_order_by=euro_tara_nume_en&id_act=1189&euro_tara_id=&euro_grup_id=&euro_vot_valoare=&euro_vot_rol_euro_grup=&euro_vot_rol_euro_tara=&vers=2

    Newton Dunn was the only one to vote against deploring Acta, but Duff, Wallis and Ludford abstained. But there were many votes, and I haven’t time to go through them all…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSue S 4th Jul - 5:50pm
    When it came down to the biggest test of prejudice, ie the selection of the American Presidential candidate by the Democrats, they voted for a...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 4th Jul - 5:13pm
    Thanks for the Tweet summaries!
  • User AvatarStuart 4th Jul - 5:12pm
    @Andrew "However perhaps the key to ending any relative career effects of parental leave is when both men and women stop calling it “maternity leave”...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 4th Jul - 5:07pm
    Wrong to call MPs ignorant about money creation. Positive Money and the Bank of England both admit that banks delete money too, but Positive Money...
  • User AvatarDavid 4th Jul - 5:00pm
    @ruth. 100% of your euro MPs are female. Seriously though 2 points: 1. You have so few MPs now and since 8 is not a...
  • User Avatarjedibeeftrix 4th Jul - 4:49pm
    @ Ruth - "most women have babies so how is it separate from gender?!" The coalition gov't very sensibly introduced equal/mixed maternity/paternity leave. So it...
Sat 4th Jul 2015
10:00
10:00
Sun 5th Jul 2015
03:00
Mon 6th Jul 2015
Wed 8th Jul 2015
Thu 9th Jul 2015
Fri 10th Jul 2015
Sat 11th Jul 2015
Sun 12th Jul 2015
Thu 16th Jul 2015
Sat 18th Jul 2015
Sun 19th Jul 2015
Mon 20th Jul 2015
Thu 23rd Jul 2015
Sat 25th Jul 2015
Sun 26th Jul 2015
Mon 27th Jul 2015
Thu 30th Jul 2015
Sat 1st Aug 2015