Lib Dem success as Home Secretary confirms government to back amendment to Public Order Act

The Guardian reports that, following a high-profile campaign, the government has agreed to retain an amendment to the Crime and Courts Bill going some way to implementing Lib Dem party policy (pdf) on the Public Order Act:

In a government climb down, the Public Order Act that covers speech and writing on signs and states: “A person is guilty of an offence if he uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour”, will be changed to remove the word insulting. The move follows a high-profile campaign which united Christian and secular groups and was spearheaded by the comedian Rowan Atkinson, the human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell and the former shadow home secretary David Davis.

The push to change section five of the act followed a series of headline-grabbing arrests and prosecutions ranging from an Oxford student asking a police officer “Do you realise your horse is gay?” which Thames Valley police described as homophobic and “offensive to people passing by”, to a 16 year old holding up a placard that said “Scientology is a dangerous cult”.

In December, the government suffered a heavy defeat in the House of Lords which voted 150 votes to 54 in favour of an amendment to remove the word “insulting”. Campaigners had complained the clause had been used by police as a “catch-all” offence to arrest people on trivial matters. It will continue to be illegal to use insulting language when an victim is clearly identifiable.

May told MPs the government was “not minded to challenge the amendment” made by the Lords even though ministers “believe that the police should be able to take action when they are sworn at, when protesters burn poppies on Armistice day and in similar scenarios”.

She added: “I respect the review taken by their lordships, they had concerns which I know are shared by some in this House that Section 5 encroaches upon freedom of expression. On the other hand the view expressed by many in the police is that Section 5 including the word ‘insulting’ is a valuable tool in helping them keep the peace and maintain public order.

* Nick Thornsby is Thursday Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs here.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32654 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

2 Comments

  • “On the other hand the view expressed by many in the police is that Section 5 including the word ‘insulting’ is a valuable tool in helping them”

    That’s the whole point.

  • Peter Watson 15th Jan '13 - 1:23pm

    Good news for Andrew Mitchell? 😉

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStuart 28th Aug - 8:07pm
    @Caron "the reason Lords reform didn’t go through was because Labour wouldn’t vote for the programme motion" So how come Nick Clegg and numerous LDV...
  • User Avatarexpats 28th Aug - 7:56pm
    bobbing cork on the water. It’s lazy journalism and Tim ought to (discretely) kick a few shins. Simon Shaw 28th Aug '15 - 5:01pm @expats...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 28th Aug - 7:54pm
    Not every issue needs to be turned into a "what about the men" thread. It can come across as nit picking. We should be good,...
  • User AvatarMark Valladares 28th Aug - 7:52pm
    @ Stuart, Yes, it is perfectly reasonable to ask the question, but you went further than that, implying that they weren't well-earned, based solely on...
  • User AvatarStuart 28th Aug - 7:44pm
    @David Blake Agree 100%. It's an insult to the voters who cast their verdict on these people just a few weeks ago. Vince is rejected...
  • User Avatarcrewegwyn 28th Aug - 7:38pm
    Had I been the Scotrail person responding to Caron's question I might well have asked "what are the specific issues for female travellers which do...