A brief (recent) history of the Lib Dems’ flagship tax-cut for the low-paid

Tax Threshold infographicGeorge Osborne’s fourth budget saw him finalise the commitment to implement in full the Lib Dems’ number one manifesto commitment: taking out of income tax all those who earn less than £10k a year.

It prompted this post by my Co-Editor Caron Lindsay yesterday – Why it’s worth being a member of the Liberal Democrats – recalling the recent history of this focus on raising the tax-free allowance. Which in turn triggered this comment by Alex Wilcock, recalling the slightly less recent history:

The fact is, raising thresholds was party policy in the 1990s, then put back on the agenda when Chris Huhne made it the central plank of his Leadership campaign in February 2006.

Curious, I thought I’d do a quick fact-check. Here’s what I found:

Lib Dem manifesto 1997:
Break open the poverty trap. We will take nearly 500,000 low earners out of income tax altogether by raising tax thresholds. This will provide lower taxes and new incentives to work, while cutting the benefits bill and reducing tax for 99.5 per cent of all income taxpayers. This will be paid for by introducing a new top tax rate of 5Op on taxable income of over £100,000 per year.

And though I can’t find Chris Huhne’s 2006 leadership manifesto online, here’s a news snippet:

Radical tax plan (14 Jan 2006)
An outsider in the race for the Liberal Democrat leadership will float a radical plan today to free thousands of people from income tax by hiking up levies on polluting industry.
Chris Huhne will tell a Lib Dem conference in London that increasing charges on industry such as the Climate Change Levy could raise enough money to increase the income tax threshold to the level of the National Minimum Wage – currently around £10,500 a year.

So there you go… Success, of course, has many parents. And for all I know the policy may well pre-date the 1990s: anyone know?

Finally worth mentioning that this isn’t a policy unique to the Lib Dems. In 2001, Margaret Thatcher’s favourite think-tank, Centre for Policy Studies, published a pamphlet, Poor People! Stop Paying Tax!, co-authored by Maurice Saatchi (yes, the very same), which argued pithily:

The government first taxes people on low incomes. Then it means-tests their income. Then it offers them benefits to restore their income back to where it was before they paid the tax. Then, finally, it taxes some of the benefits. A radical simplification is needed in which the tangled web of benefits and credits is simply exchanged for lower tax. In this proposal, the personal income tax allowance (the threshold at which you start paying tax) is dramatically raised from £4,385 to £10,000.

Such thinking never entered the Tory mainstream, though. It took the Lib Dems entering government finally to deliver this long-standing pledge.

* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and editor of the 2013 publication, The Coalition and Beyond: Liberal Reforms for the Decade Ahead. He is also a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum and writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/33789 for Twitter and emails.


  • Adam Corlett 21st Mar '13 - 12:23pm

    Not that I want to annoy people, but here’s a quote from the Orange Book (2004), p41:

    David Laws: […] Where next for the Liberal Democrats? […]
    “Simplifying the tax system to create a more logical and comprehensible system, with less ‘breaks’ and lower tax rates; abolishing regressive taxes such as council tax, and taking more low earners out of income tax.”

  • Simon McGrath 21st Mar '13 - 6:24pm

    Worth remembering how many in the party were against tax cuts originally including Evan Harris, Richard Grayson and Paul Holmes .Good to see Tim Farron was backing them.


  • @Simon McGrath
    “Worth remembering how many in the party were against tax cuts originally ”

    So, I presume you are in favour of tax-cuts on their own then without replacing the revenue stream? So which public services are you in favour of doing away with to pay for your tax-cuts and how are you unaware that we have something called a deficit?

  • Miranda Whitehead 22nd Mar '13 - 8:50am

    Lizzie Jewkes is a executive member of Women Liberal Democrats ( WLD). She ran the WLD tax policy table at the LSE manifesto day in Spring 2009 .This idea came up and received a lot of support.She then didn’t drop it but took it to a regional conference, discussed it ,and worked it up as a policy motion with the help of Jo Swinson’s office.It was supported by WLD at Autumn conference and ultimately passed into the party manifesto.
    Of course success has many parents, but I think that Lizzie Jewkes and Women Liberal Democrats can be given some credit for being the midwives of this policy!

  • Elizabeth Jewkes 22nd Mar '13 - 7:07pm

    When Nick became leader he announced our new tax policy would be to reduce the standard tax rate to 16p/£1. This was all duly voted through at the 2008 Autumn Conference. I didn’t hear one speech suggesting that instead we should be raising the threshold. All these people who now claim it was their idea were silent on that day. It was only after I suggested the idea to WLD and they took it to the LSE policy day that suddenly it became quite so popular.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTsar Nicolas 25th Dec - 11:43pm
    George Potter Your assumption is that a 50/50 split is the ideal, but your assumption is not based on anything other than mere prejudice. You...
  • User AvatarChris Manners 25th Dec - 9:01pm
    David Howell, Do you just talk in cliches or are they what you actually see? Doomed party, branch office, South of Watford (it's the Watford...
  • User AvatarGeorge Potter 25th Dec - 8:51pm
    @Tsar Nicholas Or we could tackle the social attitudes and pressures which are the cause of fewer girls proportionally choosing to do a Physics A...
  • User AvatarTsar Nicolas 25th Dec - 7:45pm
    Flo Clucas If it is bad that fewer girls than boys take physics , then maybe everyone should take physics to A level. That would...
  • User AvatarLiberal Al 25th Dec - 5:47pm
    Sorry, that should be: What has UKIP done for women, other than telling them they are NOT allowed to feed their children in restaurants.
  • User AvatarLiberal Al 25th Dec - 5:45pm
    Simon, not being an issue and not being as important an issue as another issue are two very different things. Someone suffering from the flu...
Wed 31st Dec 2014
Sat 3rd Jan 2015
Wed 14th Jan 2015
Thu 15th Jan 2015
Fri 16th Jan 2015