Lib Dem Tax Scandal

A huge gaffe for our party, as Iain Dale has exposed the dirty secret that some members of our party are in favour of land value taxation. David Lloyd-George was unavailable to comment when we tried to contact him this evening.

Share:
This entry was posted in Opposition watch and tagged . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/870 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  • Leveller
    Posted 5th June 2007 at 8:06 am | Permalink

    Tory Tax Scandal

    I can reveal the dirty secret that some members of the Conservative party are in favour of “flat” taxation. See http://www.cornerstonegroup.org.uk/Being%20Cons.htm

  • Leveller
    Posted 5th June 2007 at 8:19 am | Permalink

    Or perhaps

    Lib Dem scandal

    Tories have dramatically revealed that the Liberal Democrats allow policy debate, and occasionally there’s even disagreement.

    A Tory spokesman said “The Lib Dems are a complete disgrace. They allow people to discuss alternatives so that the Party can come up with an option that has majority support. What kind of tinpot outfit are they? We have no policies at all, indeed, we believe they are a dangerous distraction to the important business of getting elected.”

  • Posted 5th June 2007 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    LoL.

    Tony Vickers taking an opportunity to promote LVT…whatever next?!

  • Posted 8th June 2007 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Oh? is Tony Vickers in support of LVT? Well, I never knew that.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?