<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lib Dems launch Campaign for Body Confidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/lib-dems-launch-campaign-for-body-confidence-18242.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/lib-dems-launch-campaign-for-body-confidence-18242.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Suffield</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/lib-dems-launch-campaign-for-body-confidence-18242.html#comment-109739</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Suffield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18242#comment-109739</guid>
		<description>What research there is, is poorly cited. The recent Home Office review cites a single source about the impact of shopped images, and it&#039;s a Lib Dem sponsored position paper that itself cites no sources.

So, that research you want people to avail themselves of - can you cite any of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What research there is, is poorly cited. The recent Home Office review cites a single source about the impact of shopped images, and it&#8217;s a Lib Dem sponsored position paper that itself cites no sources.</p>
<p>So, that research you want people to avail themselves of &#8211; can you cite any of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Page</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/lib-dems-launch-campaign-for-body-confidence-18242.html#comment-109719</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18242#comment-109719</guid>
		<description>Andrew, where do you think the idea of an ideal body image comes from, if not the media which influences society? There&#039;s acres of research on this subject, and I would recommend you avail yourself of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, where do you think the idea of an ideal body image comes from, if not the media which influences society? There&#8217;s acres of research on this subject, and I would recommend you avail yourself of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Suffield</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/lib-dems-launch-campaign-for-body-confidence-18242.html#comment-109713</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Suffield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=18242#comment-109713</guid>
		<description>I find it a little tiresome how everybody with body-image issues seems to blame society for it.

Not really fond of this &quot;label shopped images&quot; proposal, as it just means you have a big fake image with small print that says it&#039;s fake. I&#039;d be more inclined to treat them as a variation on false advertising - any attempt to pass off a shopped image as a real one is deceptive, and deception is generally prohibited in the media. Let the creator pick any suitable way to indicate that the image is not real, and let the courts decide whether it is sufficient, rather than legislating another warning label.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it a little tiresome how everybody with body-image issues seems to blame society for it.</p>
<p>Not really fond of this &#8220;label shopped images&#8221; proposal, as it just means you have a big fake image with small print that says it&#8217;s fake. I&#8217;d be more inclined to treat them as a variation on false advertising &#8211; any attempt to pass off a shopped image as a real one is deceptive, and deception is generally prohibited in the media. Let the creator pick any suitable way to indicate that the image is not real, and let the courts decide whether it is sufficient, rather than legislating another warning label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

