Lib Dems save haggis

Written by The Voice on 25th January 2008 – 11:51 am

News reached the Voice yesterday that nine Lib Dem MPs have signed an EDM supporting haggis, which brings over £1m into the Scottish economy, particularly in the run up to Burns Night.

The future of the haggis has been jeopardised by the withdrawal of funding currently used to train workers in the meat industry. Leading haggis producers consider there to be a shortage of the skilled workers necessary for ongoing haggis production.

You can find the EDM itself here, and the BBC report about it here.


Posted in Campaigning, Scotland

15 Comments to “Lib Dems save haggis”

  1. Iain Rubie Dale Says:

    We do it cross party in the European Parliament.

  2. James Graham Says:

    The biggest threat to the Haggis is that Salmond and his buddy Donald Trump are planning to turn their natural habitat into a golf course. For shame!

  3. Tristan Mills Says:

    Is this right - Haggis producers claim they need money from the state to make them?

    We’re meant to be a party of free trade and liberty not one of rent seeking and special interests.

    We should not be proud of this, we should be ashamed.

  4. Peter Bancroft Says:

    I know this is meant to be somewhat tongue in cheek, but I was going to make a comment related to that of Tristan’s.

    Sometimes this kind of state investment can really be valuable, but I do have to wonder about this.

    How big is it? If the industry is £1M, is there £100K being spent on training? Haggises would be 10% cheaper than they should be because they’re being subsidised. Is it just £10K? If so, were all the haggis producers across the land not able to make up £10K?

  5. Jock Says:

    I have a recipe for make your own and have done it successfully once. It’s a mite stomach-churning (boiling the lung while hanging the oesophagus over the rim of the pot to collect any fluid is as bad as it gets). Can I get some of this protectionist state funded training money then for preserving the beast?

    I love a good haggis. The best game in the world



  6. sanbikinoraion Says:

    What Tristan said. What a stupid waste of taxpayers’ money.

  7. Laurence Boyce Says:

    A useful story to remember for the next time our MP’s are demanding a bigger pay rise, or saying they don’t have the time for xyz . . .

  8. Hywel Morgan Says:

    Hang on doesn’t state money go to fund the training of workers in the construction sector, the IT sector, dance and drama etc (http://danceanddrama.lsc.gov.uk/)

  9. James Graham Says:

    I have to agree Hywel. We are talking about funding training here not subsidising the industry itself (which is a different argument). Presumably the opponents of this would like to shut down the whole FE sector (or at least anything to do with butchery)?

  10. Andrew Duffield Says:

    I’m surprised it’s still possible to buy haggis in the shops, what with the hunting ban now in place.

  11. James Graham Says:

    It’s legal as long as you don’t hunt them with neeps.

  12. Jock Says:

    And besides, tradition dictates using a spud gun.

  13. John Dixon Says:

    The Haggis industry needs government funding to protect the natural habitats of the Haggis. Tristan dude, its not that bigger deal our nation needs more haggis hunters and the government is the best sector to provide em

  14. Laurence Boyce Says:

    I’m getting really confused here. I thought that haggis was some ghastly concoction of the entrails and organs of a dead sheep. Are you guys saying that they actually run around on legs?

    Smiley.

  15. Jock Says:

    Yup - two short ones on the uphill side and two long ones on the downhill side so they can run round hills with ease.



Leave a Comment



Subscribe without commenting

RSS

Liberal Democrat Voice is an independent, collaborative website run by Liberal Democrat activists, where any individual inside or outside the party can express their views. Views expressed on this website are those of the individuals who express them and may not reflect those of the party.