Lib Dems to oppose Labour/Tory attempts to weaken Freedom of Information

Today’s Guardian reports on Labour’s latest attempts to dilute the very Freedom of Information Act (2000) which it once passed:

Ministers today faced a backlash following the revelation that they are backing plans to exempt MPs from Freedom of Information Act legislation. The Liberal Democrats denounced the move, saying the party’s MPs would be advised to vote against the plan when it is considered in a free vote next Thursday. Tories are being urged to abstain. However, with many backbenchers from the two main parties privately in favour of the move, it is expected to be approved. …

Downing Street defended the plans to exempt MPs from key parts of the Freedom of Information Act, which were unveiled by the leader of the House, Harriet Harman, yesterday. The proposals are backdated to 2005, meaning they would nullify rulings from the high court and information tribunal that the public had a right to know exactly how MPs were spending allowances for second homes. Instead, individual MPs’ expenses would merely be split into more categories than before when published.

Asked whether it was right for parliamentarians to make themselves a “special case” when other public office holders had to release full details of expenses, the prime minister’s spokesman cited “security and other considerations”. He insisted there would be “a much greater degree of transparency” under the new system, adding: “You also have to be mindful of the cost associated with any very heavy-handed administration of any such scheme.”

We learn that, “A Tory source said David Cameron was likely to encourage his MPs to abstain on Thursday” – which suggests that, once again, Mr Cameron is far from convinced he can rely upon his own MPs to follow his lead.

Fortunately, the Lib Dems’ David Heath is prepared to speak up for the principle of Freedom of Information:

The Liberal Democrat frontbencher David Heath said ministers had got themselves into “a tangled and expensive mess”. “Had they published expenses in the terms they now suggest three years ago, it would have been seen as a bold move towards greater transparency,” he said.

“Now, whatever the practical merits, many will still see these proposals, fairly or unfairly, as a shabby retreat. Although this is not a matter for a whipped vote, [the Liberal Democrat leader] Nick Clegg and I have taken a consistent and clear line on the application of the Freedom of Information Act. It must apply to members of parliament just as it applies to anyone else in public life. We shouldn’t be seeking exemptions and special treatment just because it may be inconvenient.

“I will certainly be recommending that colleagues vote against the proposal to exempt parliament.”

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • When I read about this in the papers I was disgusted as I think a huge proportion of the public are, excluding MPs from the FOI act is something you’d expect Russia or Italy’s parliament to do, the Liberal Democrats should really make a huge issue of this.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDave Orbison 28th Aug - 9:25pm
    @Simon Shaw Yes, I saw Paul's helpful comments which of course post dated my original query as to what LibDem policy was. As for accusation...
  • User AvatarRoland 28th Aug - 9:12pm
    @Leave the EU - "best of 3 :-)? All the best and peace." Only 3! I got the distinct impression that the various Brexit campaigns...
  • User AvatarZack Polanski 28th Aug - 9:04pm
    Until we have Proportional Representation, whatever party is in Government is there, in effect, illegitimately. It's not that PR is the most important priority -...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 28th Aug - 8:58pm
    @Chris Bowers "The problem, I agree, is still Labour. Until it commits to PR, the scope for cooperation will remain limited. But there are signs...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 28th Aug - 8:40pm
    @Dave Orbison ”Also, you ask “why do I need access to the LibDem Railway Policy in mid 2016”. Not that I realised I was accountable...
  • User AvatarAdam Casey 28th Aug - 8:29pm
    "the Tory machine is a malign one." Sigh. Maybe one day someone will make a post like this without calling those on the other side...