LibLink: Ed Davey – not a single penny on energy bills that isn’t in the public interest

Ed Davey - Some rights reserved by Liberal DemocratsIn a speech yesterday at the Fair Energy Summit 2012, Ed Davey said:

I don’t want to add a penny to energy bills that isn’t in the public interest.

I am frankly fed up with commentators suggesting that the Government is deliberately increasing energy bills, when in fact we are doing everything we can to reduce them.

 

 

 

As the independent Committee on Climate Change has confirmed, energy bills could be significantly higher in the coming decades if we do nothing to decarbonise the power sector.

Yes, our climate goals are extremely important.  But I also want people to understand that, over time, our low-carbon policies are intended to keep bills down, not to increase them.

We also place obligations on energy companies in order to improve energy efficiency.  Again, this contributes to that 7% on the average energy bill now, but over time, as the energy efficiency of our building stock is improved, it will help reduce bills, with customers saving money as their homes or businesses require less energy to heat and power.

As a result, taking all Government energy and climate change policies combined, when we look forward to 2020, we estimate that, on average, household energy bills will be lower, not higher, than they would have been without our policies.

You can read the full text of the speech here.

* Mary Reid is the Tuesday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32241 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGF 30th Jul - 6:06pm
    No-one should imagine that fracking is in any sense green. The only justification for it is security of supply and even then I'm not convinced...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 30th Jul - 5:09pm
    I think I'm with Anthony Fairclough on this one. Well, I'm quite in favour of a codified constitution; but that's not the main issue here....
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 30th Jul - 4:32pm
    In any human endeavour there are good and bad, profesional and amateur etc. NGO's are no exception. I have a scientific background and am faced...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 30th Jul - 4:27pm
    Quoting Churchill is certainly a great example of confirmation bias in action! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
  • User AvatarAnthony Fairclough 30th Jul - 4:26pm
    Ignoring the fact that Supreme Court Justices might or might not be the 'highest qualified lawyers': you might do; but lots of people wouldn't. There's...
  • User AvatarPaul In Wokingham 30th Jul - 4:14pm
    @Simon - or as Winston Churchill said, "experts should be on tap, not on top". Confirmation bias etc etc.