LibLink: Ed Davey – not a single penny on energy bills that isn’t in the public interest

Ed Davey - Some rights reserved by Liberal DemocratsIn a speech yesterday at the Fair Energy Summit 2012, Ed Davey said:

I don’t want to add a penny to energy bills that isn’t in the public interest.

I am frankly fed up with commentators suggesting that the Government is deliberately increasing energy bills, when in fact we are doing everything we can to reduce them.

 

 

 

As the independent Committee on Climate Change has confirmed, energy bills could be significantly higher in the coming decades if we do nothing to decarbonise the power sector.

Yes, our climate goals are extremely important.  But I also want people to understand that, over time, our low-carbon policies are intended to keep bills down, not to increase them.

We also place obligations on energy companies in order to improve energy efficiency.  Again, this contributes to that 7% on the average energy bill now, but over time, as the energy efficiency of our building stock is improved, it will help reduce bills, with customers saving money as their homes or businesses require less energy to heat and power.

As a result, taking all Government energy and climate change policies combined, when we look forward to 2020, we estimate that, on average, household energy bills will be lower, not higher, than they would have been without our policies.

You can read the full text of the speech here.

* Mary Reid is the Monday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32241 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 28th Mar - 3:50am
    If Labour wanted a more effective, and much cheaper, reform to higher education policy they would have done well to take up this suggestion from...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 28th Mar - 3:38am
    Stuart: You dispute the conclusion that the fee hike has not hit applications by extrapolating from the previous trend, but the difference is too marginal...
  • User AvatarRoland 28th Mar - 2:48am
    @Jack - Firstly a £1m pension pot isn't a particularly big pot (although I accept that it's accrual is a challenge). My understanding is that...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 28th Mar - 2:06am
    A typically thorough and high-quality piece of analysis by CentreForum, which fairly highlights some of the more attractive (and voter-friendly) features of the policy as...
  • User AvatarTabman 28th Mar - 1:53am
    Expats: The Thatcher/Major administration fuelled boom and bust whereas this administration reduced the deficit The Thatcher/Major administration enacted Clause 28 whereas this administration enacted gay...
  • User AvatarPsi 28th Mar - 12:35am
    Matt (Bristol) "I am intrigued that you seem to be claiming that you never make a judgement of the morality or quality of other’s actions...
Sat 28th Mar 2015
Tue 31st Mar 2015
Sun 5th Apr 2015
Sat 11th Apr 2015
Sun 12th Apr 2015