LibLink: Julian Astle – The report every school reformer should read

Over on his blog at The Telegraph, former director of the Centre Forum think tank, Julian Astle, highlights a report by researchers at the London School of Economics looking into the effect of academies. The findings are good news for supporters of greater autonomy for schools, and one of the (perhaps surprising) conclusions of the analysis is that academies don’t just raise standards for the pupils that attend them, but also for surrounding schools, even as they lose pupils to the new academies.

Here’s what the report has to say on that last point, followed by a brief conclusion from Julian:

“In addition to this, we also find that it is possible for neighbouring schools to experience significant improvements in their pupil performance despite the reduction in the ‘quality’ of their pupil intake. This seems to occur (mainly) in the neighbours of academy schools that experience large significant improvements in their pupil performance. We do not believe that this is a coincidence: it suggests that it is possible for performance improvements in an academy to generate significant beneficial external effects on their neighbouring schools.”

It is hard to overstate the importance of this finding. If the benefits of academy conversion were captured only by those children lucky enough to attend an academy, ministers would need to weigh those benefits against the costs incurred by children elsewhere in the system. But this report confirms what economic theory predicts: that competition raises standards across the board. Finding a way to increase the level of competition in the system should therefore be a key policy objective, even in these fiscally constrained times.

You can read Julian’s full take on the report, and find a link to the document itself, here.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/24262 for Twitter and emails.

8 Comments

  • David Allen 27th May '11 - 7:04pm

    Hmm. The problem with all these issues is that novelty always tends to work a treat. So yes, the introduction of new competition in place of monopoly generally makes everybody sharpen up, try harder, and achieve a transient improvement. Ten years down the road, when things have settled down into stable oligopoly, and the competitors have shifted their focus away from survival and towards how to grow rich and fat together, the improvements disappear.

    But that doesn’t matter if you’re a Tory, the people who wanted to get rich have done so, problem solved!

  • If it’s the report everyone should read, perhaps you should have read it rather than just relying on The Telegraph. The report quite clearly points out that this effect only occurred in the very early conversions and that there was the opposite effect on the later ones.

    “We see that there have been significant improvements in the KS4 pupil performance in
    the schools that are neighbours to either early academy cohort conversions … However, there have been significant reductions in the KS4 pupil performance in the schools that are neighbours to later academy cohort conversion …”

    They also make it clear that the early academies took the best pupils from the neighbouring schools and the best teachers.

  • William Pimm 27th May '11 - 9:04pm

    Hmmm. An academy is set up and the pupils performance is found to be better than before the academy was set up and at the same time children in neighbouring schools have improved pupil performance. The improvement of performance at the academy may or may not be due to the teaching at the academy and similarly the performance of the neighbouring schools may or may not have been due to the effect of the academy or the improvement in pupil performance may to other factors which are affecting the performance of pupils in the area. Having said that the LSE has a good reputation for research, and I would be the last person to suggest that it is possible to buy a PhD by donating millions of pounds to the college.

  • Simon McGrath 27th May '11 - 9:49pm

    It amazes me that so many Lib dems are obsessively against academies and free schools. putting dogma and state above the intersts of children

  • It’s an interesting article and I’ll have to read the report myself.

    But Ian Sanderson, can a school not simply shed teachers or make adjustments over the summer if they find that they’re not going to have enough pupils? Would they really have to keep staff on they can’t afford for the next year?

    I don’t know how schools work but it would be pretty silly if they had to lag a year behind.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Pettinger 18th Apr - 2:24am
    Sir Archibald Sinclair didn't speak of austerity, lowering taxes or marketisation, let alone four cornered Liberalism, but of employment for all and building the welfare...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 18th Apr - 1:58am
    Great post by Andrew Suffield. It is both practical and principled.
  • User AvatarA Social Liberal 18th Apr - 1:33am
    Thomas Unlike malc - I don't think it is a fair point at all. As an officer in the armed forces of a country in...
  • User AvatarAndrew Suffield 18th Apr - 1:27am
    Presumably those that find means testing acceptable will be looking forward to extending “pay or die” to these people in the not too distant future…...
  • User Avatarmalc 18th Apr - 1:06am
    Thomas Robinson: Fair point and one it's hard to argue with. Also the UK has military base's in Cyprus, Germany, Holland, Gibraltar, Norway etc. Perhaps...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 18th Apr - 12:56am
    Here's Simon Jenkins's piece: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/16/janus-faced-george-osborne-defied-stereotype-triumphed