LibLink: Lord Tyler – Restore teeth to the Lords

Lib Dem peer Lord (Paul) Tyler recently took to the Guardian’s Comment Is Free along with Labour’s Lord (Andrew) Adonis with a joint piece arguing that their fellow members of the House of Lords should back proposals to reform the second chamber.

Here’s a sample:

Any objection that reform is taking place with undue haste will not stand up to scrutiny. It is now 100 years since the passage of the Parliament Act, which states the intention to substitute the Lords with “a second chamber constituted on a popular instead of hereditary basis, but such substitution cannot be immediately brought into operation”. Committees and commissions have been ruminating on what to do ever since.

The cross-party consensual genesis of the draft bill is clear. The proposals evidently have strong support from the cabinet and the prime minister, promising elections in 2015. An elected second chamber is an idea whose time has come, and if it isn’t enacted now the Lords will remain unstable until it is.

The proposals are about to be examined by a joint committee of MPs and peers that will have substantial options to consider: for instance the size of a reformed house, the form of proportional electoral system, the retention or otherwise of an appointed element. Its role, in the best tradition of that kind of scrutiny, will be to seek definition not outright demolition.

Of 117 peers appointed since the 2010 pledges, 24 are Lib Dems. Given that their party is the most trenchantly in favour of reform it would be a real betrayal if these peers switched sides. Of the 788 peers in the house at present, two-thirds were appointed after the 1997 Labour manifesto commitment to democratic reform. Implementation now is hardly a surprise.

Of course, many of the 39 new Labour peers are more sceptical. A distrust of Nick Clegg and distaste for the coalition are just two reasons for their opposition. There is genuine disquiet about the future relationship between the Lords and the Commons, much of which is based on the belief that a government should be able to “get its business through”. Indeed, parliament is there not simply to facilitate the passage of government business but to challenge the executive. A democratic second chamber will strengthen parliament as a whole. If the charge against a government is that it is doing too much, too fast, then an elected Lords is part of a prescription to slow it down.

The piece in full can be found over at the Guardian.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/24639 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 30th Oct - 11:49am
    Jack I do expect them to be able to hold their heads up high and stand up next to everything they voted for and supported...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 30th Oct - 11:42am
    Helen Tedcastle You are right that there are many individuals who identify as atheist not personally hostile to faith and in fact embrace some form...
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 30th Oct - 11:41am
    Despite some good news on environmental action from our ministers, overall we don't come across any more as seeing the environment as a major issue....
  • User AvatarHelen Tedcastle 30th Oct - 11:36am
    Richard Church What is your response to Professor Woodhead's research? Britain's religious landscape is changing but it isn't less religious. Kellner's assertion about intended Green...
  • User AvatarBob Jones 30th Oct - 11:27am
    A poll in today's Sun put the Greens on 7% and Lib Dems on 6%. This means we have lost 8% to UKIP, 5% to...
  • User AvatarRichard Church 30th Oct - 10:53am
    Helen, Opposing state funded faith schools is not intolerance of religious diversity. Diversity surely requires that all faiths and beliefs should have equal status and...