LibLink: Mark Pack – Parliamentary predictions on the Queen’s Speech

Over at The House Magazine, Mark Pack (formerly of this parish) previews the upcoming Queen’s Speech — and applauds the fact that it may be rather thinner than we’ve grown used to:

Far too often ministers have confused volume of legislation sent through Parliament with being a good minister. It is an oh-so-tempting trap to fall into, as shown by some of the daft criticisms of the last Queen’s Speech – seeking to equate the Government’s seriousness about economic policies with the number of Bills on the subject.

Thankfully, however, at least the Liberal Democrat part of the Government is sticking to sense, and rather than demanding huge numbers of pieces of new legislation, is concentrating on the successful implementation of policies already set out. Whether it is the pupil premium, the Green Investment Bank or the Green Deal, the need is not for more legislation on top of that already set out, it is for departments to concentrate on implementation. It is implementation that will turn those policies into green jobs, better chances in life, a healthier environment and lower inflation.

And if you want to find out about the major exception (and the major omission) you’ll need to read Mark’s piece in full here, over at PoliticsHome.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink and Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34387 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 23rd Nov - 10:45am
    Danny, the public at large don't believe you. You may have done a lot, but they wanted and needed you to do more. You allowed...
  • User AvatarRC 23rd Nov - 10:43am
    @ Technical Ephemera "On the one hand we have a rigorous reviewed academic analysis that shows the coalition have systematically transferred money from the poor...
  • User AvatarStuart 23rd Nov - 10:24am
    @Sarah Noble I don't think Yvette Copper's comments were aimed at defending Tory election posters. However the Tory billboard you refer to actually said :-...
  • User AvatarJohn Dixon 23rd Nov - 10:23am
    This is good debate though and perhaps unlike a lot of other areas it isn't just one side talking to themselves.
  • User AvatarJohn Dixon 23rd Nov - 10:21am
    If you feel better informed it is perhaps informed with some rather dubious information. A few things quickly as there's a lot up above. 1....
  • User AvatarAnne 23rd Nov - 10:19am
    Interesting article in the Gyardian today http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/23/food-banks-low-income-families-record-demand You were saying about low income families Mr Alexander?