LibLink: Mark Pack – Parliamentary predictions on the Queen’s Speech

Over at The House Magazine, Mark Pack (formerly of this parish) previews the upcoming Queen’s Speech — and applauds the fact that it may be rather thinner than we’ve grown used to:

Far too often ministers have confused volume of legislation sent through Parliament with being a good minister. It is an oh-so-tempting trap to fall into, as shown by some of the daft criticisms of the last Queen’s Speech – seeking to equate the Government’s seriousness about economic policies with the number of Bills on the subject.

Thankfully, however, at least the Liberal Democrat part of the Government is sticking to sense, and rather than demanding huge numbers of pieces of new legislation, is concentrating on the successful implementation of policies already set out. Whether it is the pupil premium, the Green Investment Bank or the Green Deal, the need is not for more legislation on top of that already set out, it is for departments to concentrate on implementation. It is implementation that will turn those policies into green jobs, better chances in life, a healthier environment and lower inflation.

And if you want to find out about the major exception (and the major omission) you’ll need to read Mark’s piece in full here, over at PoliticsHome.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink and Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34387 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSylvia Walker 26th Jul - 12:03pm
    My story illustrates the problem. I dropped out of my grammar school (many years ago) not because of a lack of ability but because of...
  • User AvatarCharlie 26th Jul - 11:49am
    Mike Drew Israel occurred because arab land owners sold land and then arab armies lost a war of extermination. Israel was not imposed by anyone....
  • User AvatarTim13 26th Jul - 11:31am
    LJP, if you DO mean it, why on earth say "with respect"?? Find a neutral phrase if you really must.
  • User AvatarMartinB 26th Jul - 11:30am
    @tony b Yes, it's almost identical to that being spouted by Osborne, Cameron et al. Extraordinary to see such co.omplete capitulation to the tory brand...
  • User AvatarTim13 26th Jul - 11:29am
    Sorry, I am old fashioned enough to think that bias in advice can creep in when private sector external agencies are used. I also agree...
  • User AvatarJenny Barnes 26th Jul - 11:28am
    a "flack" is a PR person/ dogsbody. I can think of a few in this government. Ithink it should be "flak"; which is short for...