LibLink: Mark Pack – Parliamentary predictions on the Queen’s Speech

Over at The House Magazine, Mark Pack (formerly of this parish) previews the upcoming Queen’s Speech — and applauds the fact that it may be rather thinner than we’ve grown used to:

Far too often ministers have confused volume of legislation sent through Parliament with being a good minister. It is an oh-so-tempting trap to fall into, as shown by some of the daft criticisms of the last Queen’s Speech – seeking to equate the Government’s seriousness about economic policies with the number of Bills on the subject.

Thankfully, however, at least the Liberal Democrat part of the Government is sticking to sense, and rather than demanding huge numbers of pieces of new legislation, is concentrating on the successful implementation of policies already set out. Whether it is the pupil premium, the Green Investment Bank or the Green Deal, the need is not for more legislation on top of that already set out, it is for departments to concentrate on implementation. It is implementation that will turn those policies into green jobs, better chances in life, a healthier environment and lower inflation.

And if you want to find out about the major exception (and the major omission) you’ll need to read Mark’s piece in full here, over at PoliticsHome.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink and Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34387 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid-1 30th Mar - 6:36am
    I think the usual approach to immigration is completely backwards. People start by asking "how many immigrants can we tolerate?" and, once that is answered...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Mar - 4:39am
    @ Stuart This is getting rather tiresome... I did get it, I have studied economics and have a reasonable grasp of statistics. I know the...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Mar - 3:28am
    @ Stuart "There is no need for you to come up with your own “interpretation” of what Labour’s pledge means, because Labour have been very...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 30th Mar - 3:10am
    @ PT I agree with you that GDP per head is a better proxy for economic welfare than the absolute level of GDP, which merely...
  • User AvatarGary Mc 30th Mar - 12:47am
    I've noticed all of the polls seem to give the SNP more seats than us (Liberal Democrats). I'm not sure the SNP will win as...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 29th Mar - 11:39pm
    Immigration must be restricted to the number of people we can integrate and absorb culturally, socially and economically each year. It must be planned so...
Tue 31st Mar 2015
Sun 5th Apr 2015
Sat 11th Apr 2015
Sun 12th Apr 2015
Sat 25th Apr 2015