LibLink: Mark Pack’s five lessons from the US election

I’ve long suspected that the Voice’s Mark Pack doesn’t need to sleep and his clear thinking after a long electoral night kind of backs up my theory. As my neural pathways crumble from lack of sleep, he has already put together five lessons we should learn from both Obama’s win and Romney’s loss.

He talks about the important of the non white male vote. While Romney might have done well amongst white men, he lost many other important groups of voters, including women, who make up the majority.

Mark also made a good point about the many emails which came out of the Obama campaign asking us to do stuff rather than read stuff. This is something they’ve continued from 2008 when they allocated people calls and sent out an email saying, basically, that if you didn’t do them and Obama lost, it would be your fault. It was a bit like the letter Chris Rennard used to write and leave for people who wanted to sit down on polling day at a by-election. You know, the one where he talks about losing Richmond by a few hundred votes and how bad would we feel if it happened again. It was supposed to make push through the pain and it usually worked, even if muttered a few epithets about him under your breath.

Mark’s view:

I cannot vote in US elections. I cannot donate to US campaigns. Yet Mr Obama kept on wanting me to do things. Phone, donate, visit, donate, tweet, donate, Facebook, donate. And donate. He almost never told me about what he believes; he repeatedly asked me to do things.

Compare that to the sorts of emails UK political parties predominantly send out. They tell you about how wonderful they, their leaders and their policies are. Or, for a more lively message how awful the other parties, their leaders and their policies are.

When Tim Farron and Paddy Ashdown get wind of this, there will be no stopping them. We’ll be getting emails telling us to knock on 300 doors before lunch.

You can read the whole piece here.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink and Online politics.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31382 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Chris Rennard 7th Nov '12 - 10:37pm

    Caron, actually the letters and e-mails urging last minute help to make the difference were based on West Derbyshire 1986 when we lost by 100 votes, 18896 to 18796. I said afterwards, ‘the people have spoken, the bastards’

  • Martin Pierce 8th Nov '12 - 7:43am

    Chris Rennard has kind of beaten me to it, but I was going to say the result in Richmond you’re referring to was when we lost by 74 in the 1983 General Election. To this day people are still torturing themselves with the thought of how they could have found those people

  • Caron Lindsay Caron Lindsay 8th Nov '12 - 8:01am

    Thanks for that, Chris and Martin. There really is nothing worse than losing an election by a whisker and it’s something you want to avoid at all costs. I will never forget Chris’ letter. I read it in Littleborough and Saddleworth when I was actually exhausted and the adrenaline it created helped give me the energy to go out again (and be chased down the street by a couple of Labour thugs).

  • As interesting as why Obama won an election against the tide is why Romney failed when it was there for the taking
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2012/11/07/why-romney-lost-conservative-commentary-roundup/

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid-1 29th Mar - 3:28am
    @Steve Comer "When did we morph into narrow minded ‘me-too’ Unionists?" Probably around 2007.
  • User AvatarDavid-1 29th Mar - 3:18am
    Charlie might have been happy in the Labour Party of the 1940s. Judging from his repeated references to "white people," however, I think he'd have...
  • User AvatarSteve Comer 29th Mar - 3:13am
    Nick. I don't think any of us Social Liberals are as surprised as you appear to be that Labour is authoritarian on civil lliberties. We...
  • User AvatarSteve Comer 29th Mar - 3:02am
    Why are so many Liberal Democrats wasting time and effort attacking the SNP, and not our real enemies in the Labour and Tory parties? I...
  • User AvatarDan Falchikov 29th Mar - 2:01am
    Hmm - four by elections in Scotland on Thursday and the Lib Dems managed a grand total of 61 votes with the SNP winning three...
  • User AvatarDan Falchikov 29th Mar - 12:49am
    'Didn’t they (Labour) once used to at least say they stood for decent, liberal, progressive values?' I'm assuming whoever at the Voice wrote this was...
Tue 31st Mar 2015
Sun 5th Apr 2015
Sat 11th Apr 2015
Sun 12th Apr 2015
Sat 25th Apr 2015