LibLink… Paddy Ashdown: Defence cuts? Why, they’ve barely started

In today’s Times (£) Paddy Ashdown argues that the Ministry of Defence is “no longer fit for purpose.”

Ashdown says that the current government are not making enough progress with addressing the Ministry’s problems: the large annual deficit, bureaucratic blunders and project overruns and puts them down to a lack of political direction.

Here’s an excerpt:

The dust is now settling on the Strategic Defence and Security Review, published last October. And what it reveals is that the deeply painful cuts already announced are not going to be enough to balance the books. There will have to be more — there may even have to be what is, in effect, a second review.

Of the £36 billion of cuts the MoD agreed to make over the next four years, it seems to have found less than half. If this is true, then the scale of the black hole that remains means that even if the MoD cuts everything except what is needed to fight the war in Afghanistan (which the Prime Minster has ringfenced as forbidden territory for cuts), it would still not be enough to bring the department back within budget. Watch this space: we are about to see either a Treasury bailout or more defence cuts down to a level that could even include our precious amphibious capability.

Today’s PAC [Public Accounts Committee] report cites delays and alterations to project specifications as the key cause of previous cost overruns. That is bad enough, but worse still, we are still making the same mistakes. The decison to fit “cats and traps” to the new aircraft carriers in order to take cheaper planes has, the PAC reports, been made on the basis of an “inadequate understanding of costs”.

Ashdown concludes that, with the MoD “still haemorrhaging money at a colossal rate,” our inadequacies may be exposed by the next unexpected security challenge, which “could prove disastrous for a Conservative-led government.”

You can read the full piece in today’s Times (subscription required).

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

6 Comments

  • I really wish we had a government that had the courage to scrap our useless Nuclear deterrent. I would feel more comfortable if we had kept the Harrier force and perhaps purchased some Long Range Maritime search and patrol aircraft. The current Minister of Defence still imagines Britain as a Great Power. Frankly I don’t see how a Nuclear deterrent address the current threats.

  • I thought cats and traps were to ensure interoperability with other Navies / Air Forces who won’t have the STOVL capability of the F35 variant B?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDJ 26th Feb - 5:22pm
    After Nick Clegg forgot to think about how Brexit would impact on Wales it's great to hear a liberal and Welsh perspective. It's great to...
  • User Avatarfrankie 26th Feb - 5:13pm
    Clottie, If you look at what brave Brexiteers believe and what the SNP believe they are actually the same. Brave Brexiteers it's all the EU's...
  • User AvatarDJ 26th Feb - 4:51pm
    Education, after health, is probably the second biggest responsibility in Wales and it's so important that the wider party supports Kirsty as she goes about...
  • User AvatarMike S 26th Feb - 4:45pm
    I think younger people generally are simply so interconnected now (the Facebook, Smartphone generation), that they SEE the world so differently to what we did...
  • User AvatarMike S 26th Feb - 4:28pm
    @ Peter "The problem with the preamble is that it is a destination (an end-point rather than a “starting point”) and not a route map....
  • User AvatarClootie 26th Feb - 4:26pm
    ...and yet Scottish LibDems continue to put the Imperial Union first rather than fight for the Scottish nation to have its vote respected. The video...