LibLink… Paddy Ashdown: Defence cuts? Why, they’ve barely started

In today’s Times (£) Paddy Ashdown argues that the Ministry of Defence is “no longer fit for purpose.”

Ashdown says that the current government are not making enough progress with addressing the Ministry’s problems: the large annual deficit, bureaucratic blunders and project overruns and puts them down to a lack of political direction.

Here’s an excerpt:

The dust is now settling on the Strategic Defence and Security Review, published last October. And what it reveals is that the deeply painful cuts already announced are not going to be enough to balance the books. There will have to be more — there may even have to be what is, in effect, a second review.

Of the £36 billion of cuts the MoD agreed to make over the next four years, it seems to have found less than half. If this is true, then the scale of the black hole that remains means that even if the MoD cuts everything except what is needed to fight the war in Afghanistan (which the Prime Minster has ringfenced as forbidden territory for cuts), it would still not be enough to bring the department back within budget. Watch this space: we are about to see either a Treasury bailout or more defence cuts down to a level that could even include our precious amphibious capability.

Today’s PAC [Public Accounts Committee] report cites delays and alterations to project specifications as the key cause of previous cost overruns. That is bad enough, but worse still, we are still making the same mistakes. The decison to fit “cats and traps” to the new aircraft carriers in order to take cheaper planes has, the PAC reports, been made on the basis of an “inadequate understanding of costs”.

Ashdown concludes that, with the MoD “still haemorrhaging money at a colossal rate,” our inadequacies may be exposed by the next unexpected security challenge, which “could prove disastrous for a Conservative-led government.”

You can read the full piece in today’s Times (subscription required).

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

6 Comments

  • I really wish we had a government that had the courage to scrap our useless Nuclear deterrent. I would feel more comfortable if we had kept the Harrier force and perhaps purchased some Long Range Maritime search and patrol aircraft. The current Minister of Defence still imagines Britain as a Great Power. Frankly I don’t see how a Nuclear deterrent address the current threats.

  • I thought cats and traps were to ensure interoperability with other Navies / Air Forces who won’t have the STOVL capability of the F35 variant B?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJames Baillie 31st May - 2:53pm
    Peter - I (clearly) disagree, mainly in that I think you're greatly overestimating the extent to which returning to nation-states is a) possible and b)...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 31st May - 2:27pm
    We need to talk to and work with everyone campaigning for a Remain vote, left, right, centre or inside-out. I find interesting the suggestion that...
  • User Avatarpetermartin2001 31st May - 2:13pm
    I really don't think Yanis believes what he's saying about a "Different Europe is Possible" except perhaps if its even much worse than the current...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 31st May - 1:45pm
    nvelope 2003 Wrong , the TV licence does not have the status of a tax , it is , morally a dreadful poll tax ,...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 31st May - 1:37pm
    Following the argument in the response , the solution is ownership of property by vastly more people , if we put more thought into actually...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 31st May - 1:30pm
    Very funny article and the Tory party ripping itself to shreds is the only part of the In/Out debate that cheers me up, but even...