LibLink: Pauline Pearce – After the riots, the Liberal Democrats stood by me

As we reported last month, Pauline Pearce – the ‘Hackney Heroine’ – standing as Lib Dem candidate in May’s elections. And last week she explained to The Guardian exactly why she is standing for the party: “because I discovered their commitment to poor communities is genuine”. Here’s an excerpt from Pauline’s article:

I announced earlier this month that I am planning to stand for election as a Liberal Democrat councillor in Hackney, yet I’m still posed a common question by journalists and friends alike: why the Lib Dems? Following the riots, all the major political parties courted me. But when the bad press came out about me having being a drug fixer after a sting in November 2011, hardly anyone wanted anything to do with me any more. The Liberal Democrats, however, didn’t turn their backs like others did.

The Lib Dems promote opportunities amongst the disenfranchised, and this is crucial to people living in poor communities, like mine, many of whom only know of criminogenic lifestyles. I had already been a fan of their ideas, but when the whole issue came about and they still were prepared to take me under their wing, that’s when I really considered the party.

For me, this is all about a second chance. I’ve been in gangs, I’ve dealt with drugs, I’ve been in prison and I’ve experienced the most rubbish of lives at one stage. As I’ve been at both ends of the field, I hope that my input will make the youths look up and say: “You know what? If she can do it, I can do it. I can turn my life around. I can look for that second chance in life.” It doesn’t have to be about being out there dealing on street corners and getting involved with gangs, and doing all the things that lead you to prison.

You can read Pauline’s post in full here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • I am really pleased that Pauline has made this statement, but has it appeared anywhere in the press in a positive way?
    Pauline is not the first and will not be the last who is attracted to LibDems in this way, but we must ensure that we follow through with the support.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 25th Nov - 8:22pm
    Eddie Sammon - Damn right. The suffering the BTL classes have endured over the past 15 years is just intolerable really. I was just thinking...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 25th Nov - 8:14pm
    Five things : Five things we learned, Five things we want....all common currency in local journalism these days... even Tim's doing it. Here are my...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 25th Nov - 8:11pm
    Malc, I think you'll find that the de facto economy spokesman in the HoC (by his own choice) is Tim Farron.
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 25th Nov - 7:56pm
    The Autumn Statement was alright. I give it 6/10 for the climbdown on tax credit and police cuts plus the extra defence spending. Buy to...
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 25th Nov - 7:53pm
    I'm not sure where Tim got his information from regarding further education, but relatively speaking things are much better than was feared. See for instance...
  • User AvatarNeil Sandison 25th Nov - 7:51pm
    Miffed red tory . If you are not comfortable where you are don't stay there .We have good honest open debates around policy. We don't...