LibLink: Pauline Pearce – After the riots, the Liberal Democrats stood by me

As we reported last month, Pauline Pearce – the ‘Hackney Heroine’ – standing as Lib Dem candidate in May’s elections. And last week she explained to The Guardian exactly why she is standing for the party: “because I discovered their commitment to poor communities is genuine”. Here’s an excerpt from Pauline’s article:

I announced earlier this month that I am planning to stand for election as a Liberal Democrat councillor in Hackney, yet I’m still posed a common question by journalists and friends alike: why the Lib Dems? Following the riots, all the major political parties courted me. But when the bad press came out about me having being a drug fixer after a sting in November 2011, hardly anyone wanted anything to do with me any more. The Liberal Democrats, however, didn’t turn their backs like others did.

The Lib Dems promote opportunities amongst the disenfranchised, and this is crucial to people living in poor communities, like mine, many of whom only know of criminogenic lifestyles. I had already been a fan of their ideas, but when the whole issue came about and they still were prepared to take me under their wing, that’s when I really considered the party.

For me, this is all about a second chance. I’ve been in gangs, I’ve dealt with drugs, I’ve been in prison and I’ve experienced the most rubbish of lives at one stage. As I’ve been at both ends of the field, I hope that my input will make the youths look up and say: “You know what? If she can do it, I can do it. I can turn my life around. I can look for that second chance in life.” It doesn’t have to be about being out there dealing on street corners and getting involved with gangs, and doing all the things that lead you to prison.

You can read Pauline’s post in full here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/28004 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

One Comment

  • I am really pleased that Pauline has made this statement, but has it appeared anywhere in the press in a positive way?
    Pauline is not the first and will not be the last who is attracted to LibDems in this way, but we must ensure that we follow through with the support.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarexpats 19th Apr - 2:59pm
    Sorry, Caron but that is not my impression....even on your thread about the recent debate you barely comment criticise Cameron's 'no-show' and only refer to...
  • User AvatarPhilip Thomas 19th Apr - 2:58pm
    Steve Way. Ok, well, make up your mind to actually vote rather than spoiling your ballot paper and you can honestly say to a Labour...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 19th Apr - 2:56pm
    Commenters here who attack Clegg from the left naturally focus on the element of the Lib Dems' 2010 support that has defected to Labour and...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 19th Apr - 2:51pm
    I was going to say David, Caron Lindsay is probably the most prominent editor of the site and she definitely doesn't have any tory bias....
  • User Avatarexpats 19th Apr - 2:51pm
    JJ 19th Apr '15 - 2:11pm .......I don’t think a coalition with Labour would be a dream come true either it would be an eletoral...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 19th Apr - 2:49pm
    @ Eddie Sammon “cutting the deficit every year” This is a justifiable position. The Greens reject it. However we are inconsistent. We say Oh yes...
Sat 25th Apr 2015