LibLink: Willie Rennie – after the referendum

Willie Rennie - Some rights reserved by Liberal DemocratsIn The Scotsman, Willie Rennie asks some pertinent questions about what might happen after the Scottish referendum:

The Electoral Commission surprised us all on Wednesday when it went beyond spending limits and the wording of the question to press for clarity on the process after either result in the referendum. It did not ask us to negotiate a solution on the substance of our conflicting cases as pre-negotiations are impossible.

Yet, on reflection, I believe this will ­assist those who share my view that Scotland should remain in the UK.

Although the Nationalists say negotiations could be wrapped up in 16 months you only have to consider what would need to be agreed to realise it may take much longer. To start with there is Scotland’s place in the UN, EU and Nato, never mind the UK’s 15,000 international treaties. When would the deadline be for the redrafting of centuries worth of legislation and regulations? What would ­happen if Scots didn’t like the deal secured by the Nationalists?

Yu can read the full article here.

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist. As part of the Liberal Democrat Voice team he helps with photos and moderation on the site, as well as occsionally contributing articles. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in LibLink.


  • I thought that precedent esablishes that the successor states inherit the treaties and obligations of the previous state. Surely this has to be the case, otherwise there would be a spate of succeeding states as a device to shrug off national debts. Would Crete become debt free simply by splitting from Greece? – I do not think so.

    I am unclear why devo max or devo plus is not on the table. Surely this is the most popular option, yet it is not available. It seems to me that every ‘Yes’ vote strengthens this choice whilst a ‘No’ vote reinforces the status quo. I see a parallel here with the AV vote, which in effect became a reaffirmation of FPTP.

    A ‘Yes’ vote opens up negotiations and establishes a direction of travel (with possibly a variable timetable for arrival).

  • Steve Comer 4th Feb '13 - 11:50pm

    Surely we have many precedents for states breaking away from countries don’t we?
    Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia etc. were all re-established in the early 1990s, what about the ‘thousands of treaties’ they would have been part of? I don’t remember a crisis of legislative re-drafting in these countries.
    Sorry but the ‘better together’ campaign needs to do more than just silly scaremongering if its going to win a referendum.
    There is actually a powerful argument on subsidiarity grounds for Scottish independence, not in the old narrow nationalist sense, but in a desire that Scotland’s future lies as a state ruling itself within the context of the European Union.
    Liberal supported Home Rule for Scotland and Ireland 100 years ago, why have we become little unionists now?

  • Steve, I agree completely and have commented on other threads to the effect that the apparent Lig Dem position does not seem to add up.

    On this forum there has been little in the way of response. Perhaps it is a lack of interest, a lack of policy or simply tacit dismissal of anything other than the status quo. It is depressing to see Lib Dems joining in with scare mongering.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 22nd Oct - 1:33am
    @Paul Barker - I fear you are reading a bit more into my post than is called for when you say "its common practise to...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 22nd Oct - 12:44am
    @ James “free movement of Labour is untenable for a progressive party” (sic). It is a great shame we can’t consider if free movement of...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 22nd Oct - 12:05am
    @ Paul Barker “I have to say that I dont get this 26 Seats business” Newshound provided this figure. He/She should justify this figure. Our...
  • User Avatarmalc 21st Oct - 11:28pm
    During the referendum campaign most - if not all - of the leading "brexiteers" said that anyone already in the UK should be allowed to...
  • User Avatarfrankie 21st Oct - 10:37pm
    El Sid "I was initially in favour of staying in the EU but the campaign persuaded me to vote leave." I rather doubt that given...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 21st Oct - 10:32pm
    @DavidEvans. On this site its common practise to read someones comment before you criticise it. The 34 MPs figure has been widely quoted but it...