LibLink: Anthony Lester – My vision of a Leveson law

Liberal Democrat peer Anthony Lester has written for the Guardian about his independent Press Council bill which he introduced in the House of Lords yesterday.

If his measure became law, it would be the Supreme Court rather than OFCOM which would ensure that the independent self regulatory body was genuinely independent and complying with the principles Lord Leveson set out in his report.

Writing about the need for legislation, Lester wrote:

Statutory underpinning is needed to compel ministers and others to uphold freedom of speech and of the press, and the independence of the new press council. This aim cannot be achieved by contract alone because a contract does not bind third parties or affect the role of the courts. An act of parliament would also provide a powerful incentive for publishers to join the new system and abide by high professional standards. The incentive is contained in my bill by widening the public interest defence in claims of libel and media intrusion on personal privacy where a newspaper or its editor or staff can show that they have acted responsibly in news gathering and publishing, in accordance with the standards and practices prescribed by the press council. The courts would take that into account, making it much less likely that a publisher would be found liable for alleged wrongdoing.

He outlined what he was trying to achieve in the Bill:

I have sought to provide a framework of principles, rather than a code of detailed prescriptive rules, keeping the bill’s clauses to the bare minimum, and leaving the scope and machinery of the press council to be worked out by the promoters of the scheme. If something on the lines of my bill is approved, only a future parliament enacting primary legislation will be able to amend or abolish the act. That, and the role of the president of the UK supreme court as validator – and the safeguard of judicial review for lapses by the press council – are all designed to enhance much needed public confidence in independent self-regulation.

You can read the whole article here.

* Caron Lindsay is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32132 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • How incredibly sensible. So what chance of it succeeding under t’Coalition?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Walter 22nd Sep - 9:08pm
    Thank you for those very good points
  • User AvatarChris_sh 22nd Sep - 9:06pm
    @Tim13 "Roland Wales does not, of course, have its own laws as things stand." Oh but it does, it has had the authority to create...
  • User AvatarChris_sh 22nd Sep - 9:00pm
    @mack (Not a Lib dem) So are you saying that the English should have to vote twice and that they can not have some one...
  • User AvatarMichael Kilpatrick 22nd Sep - 8:58pm
    George Potter, it would, I think, be lunacy to allow any district *not* to go unitary when regional assemblies are created. Who on earth would...
  • User Avatarmack (Not a Lib dem) 22nd Sep - 8:47pm
    @ Chris_Sh "all Countries would have members elected to look after “local” issues and all would have members elected to look after UK wide issues...
  • User AvatarStephen Hesketh 22nd Sep - 8:47pm
    David Pollard 22nd Sep '14 - 8:24pm re my post of 8:41 ... apologies David, I (mis) read your post too quickly! But I think...