LibLink: Anthony Lester – My vision of a Leveson law

Liberal Democrat peer Anthony Lester has written for the Guardian about his independent Press Council bill which he introduced in the House of Lords yesterday.

If his measure became law, it would be the Supreme Court rather than OFCOM which would ensure that the independent self regulatory body was genuinely independent and complying with the principles Lord Leveson set out in his report.

Writing about the need for legislation, Lester wrote:

Statutory underpinning is needed to compel ministers and others to uphold freedom of speech and of the press, and the independence of the new press council. This aim cannot be achieved by contract alone because a contract does not bind third parties or affect the role of the courts. An act of parliament would also provide a powerful incentive for publishers to join the new system and abide by high professional standards. The incentive is contained in my bill by widening the public interest defence in claims of libel and media intrusion on personal privacy where a newspaper or its editor or staff can show that they have acted responsibly in news gathering and publishing, in accordance with the standards and practices prescribed by the press council. The courts would take that into account, making it much less likely that a publisher would be found liable for alleged wrongdoing.

He outlined what he was trying to achieve in the Bill:

I have sought to provide a framework of principles, rather than a code of detailed prescriptive rules, keeping the bill’s clauses to the bare minimum, and leaving the scope and machinery of the press council to be worked out by the promoters of the scheme. If something on the lines of my bill is approved, only a future parliament enacting primary legislation will be able to amend or abolish the act. That, and the role of the president of the UK supreme court as validator – and the safeguard of judicial review for lapses by the press council – are all designed to enhance much needed public confidence in independent self-regulation.

You can read the whole article here.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32132 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

One Comment

  • How incredibly sensible. So what chance of it succeeding under t’Coalition?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCaracatus 5th Mar - 3:38am
    It takes a particular form of optimism when a poll places the Lib Dems third behind the Tories in West Aberdeenshire to say "support is...
  • User Avatarmalc 5th Mar - 12:57am
    You have one of the very few popular UK politicians in Charles Kennedy and you never seem to use him. Whoever is running your campaign...
  • User AvatarHywel 5th Mar - 12:28am
    Al - no they didn't that's the standard 2 question Ashcroft poll. You would expect that will a very well known figure like Charles that...
  • User AvatarAl 4th Mar - 11:55pm
    Actually, what Caron is hiding or is not aware of is that they DID ask what difference Charles Kennedy makes as a candidate. as Prof...
  • User AvatarDan Falchikov 4th Mar - 11:48pm
    Saddam Hussein isn't dead, the American forces are retreating on all fronts, Bagdad isn't under attack... I think it is time for the Scottish Lib...
  • User Avatarmalc 4th Mar - 11:42pm
    Bad news for Labour and the LibDems, but I disagree that it is worse for Labour. If Charles Kennedy was to lose his seat -...