LibLink…Nick Thornsby: The snooper’s charter has reminded Nick Clegg, finally, he is a liberal

Yes, I know, it is Snoopers’ Charter Central here on Liberal Democrat Voice today. I hope you will forgive us for being relieved and delighted that Nick Clegg has made sure that the Government will not be bringing forward an illiberal, unnecessary and intrusive measure.

Over at the Guardian’s Comment is Free, our Nick Thornsby has given his take on the issue, going back through the events of the past year since the idea first emerged. At that point the Party was furious that we could even contemplate such a thing:

 Their anger was such that a hastily arranged conference call with key government figures was held with activists, with the aim of reassuring the already bruised troops. Instead, the call simply made the situation worse, with special advisers failing to see the fundamental civil libertarian objections to such a proposal, and instead trying to explain why such a change was necessary.

However, as the Home Office’s proposals became more concrete, Clegg and his advisers grasped the problem and forced the proposed bill to be published in draft form to allow a committee of both houses of parliament to consider it.

The Committee rejected the Bill in fairly scathing terms and Nick Clegg rejected the idea of a Bill. Downing Street at the time indicated it was only a temporary reprieve. Nick Thornsby continues:

However, Clegg then found himself in an acutely tricky situation. On the one hand he had led the Home Office up the garden path of stating that he believed that some sort of change was necessary. Yet on the other he had a party membership still reeling from the “secret courts” fiascoand who want to see the party leadership stand firm on an issue – civil liberties – which most see as a defining one for the party.

You can read the whole article here.

* Caron Lindsay is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34258 for Twitter and emails.

2 Comments

  • I don’t believe that Nick Clegg is any more or less mindful that he is supposed to be a liberal than when he voted in favour of secret courts. His calculation of the consequences is different, that’s all.

  • Basically Nicks for the bill (got to cosy with Tory’s like lot others ) and now under pressure from his party backed off Thats what happened

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User Avatararnieg 1st Aug - 4:33pm
    I think the income in advance may relate to Conference Office activity - bookings taken for the following March's Spring conference. I understand last year...
  • User AvatarRob Parsons 1st Aug - 4:29pm
    I haven't said anywhere that free trade is wrong. But free trade works where information is free as well as the trade. Dispute settlement may...
  • User AvatarJennie 1st Aug - 4:19pm
    Whereas repeatedly abusing Caron and the rest of the LDV team in the comments to this and other articles is perfectly permissible under your definition...
  • User AvatarGF 1st Aug - 4:11pm
    Charles Kennedy is absolutely right; the USP provides a vital cross-subsidy from urban to rural areas without which the latter would become dangerously isolated. The...
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 1st Aug - 3:50pm
    Oh dear. Almost everything in this piece is wrong. The benefits of free trade are pretty well know and it is absurd to say that...
  • User AvatarRoland 1st Aug - 3:39pm
    >" The only justification for it is security of supply" Fracking fails spectacularly at that test: totally insufficient reserves have been discovered to make any...