LibLink…Nick Thornsby: The snooper’s charter has reminded Nick Clegg, finally, he is a liberal

Yes, I know, it is Snoopers’ Charter Central here on Liberal Democrat Voice today. I hope you will forgive us for being relieved and delighted that Nick Clegg has made sure that the Government will not be bringing forward an illiberal, unnecessary and intrusive measure.

Over at the Guardian’s Comment is Free, our Nick Thornsby has given his take on the issue, going back through the events of the past year since the idea first emerged. At that point the Party was furious that we could even contemplate such a thing:

 Their anger was such that a hastily arranged conference call with key government figures was held with activists, with the aim of reassuring the already bruised troops. Instead, the call simply made the situation worse, with special advisers failing to see the fundamental civil libertarian objections to such a proposal, and instead trying to explain why such a change was necessary.

However, as the Home Office’s proposals became more concrete, Clegg and his advisers grasped the problem and forced the proposed bill to be published in draft form to allow a committee of both houses of parliament to consider it.

The Committee rejected the Bill in fairly scathing terms and Nick Clegg rejected the idea of a Bill. Downing Street at the time indicated it was only a temporary reprieve. Nick Thornsby continues:

However, Clegg then found himself in an acutely tricky situation. On the one hand he had led the Home Office up the garden path of stating that he believed that some sort of change was necessary. Yet on the other he had a party membership still reeling from the “secret courts” fiascoand who want to see the party leadership stand firm on an issue – civil liberties – which most see as a defining one for the party.

You can read the whole article here.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

2 Comments

  • I don’t believe that Nick Clegg is any more or less mindful that he is supposed to be a liberal than when he voted in favour of secret courts. His calculation of the consequences is different, that’s all.

  • Basically Nicks for the bill (got to cosy with Tory’s like lot others ) and now under pressure from his party backed off Thats what happened

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStevan Rose 29th Aug - 2:41am
    "This woman has become a candidate – against all of the odds and without family connections. " What has that got to do with H...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 29th Aug - 1:56am
    I have tried to find sources that explain in plain language where the deficits came from and all I can find is that BHS didn't...
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 29th Aug - 1:10am
    60% of the population are not interested in the voting system. Two thirds of those that are interested prefer FPTP. We had that referendum, the...
  • User AvatarJamesG 29th Aug - 12:03am
    Perhaps some 'Liberals' here managed to notice the violence on the Corsica beach which was caused by Islamic extremists before there was any ban there...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 28th Aug - 11:52pm
    @Dave Orbison "Not for the first time, and no doubt not for the last, you simply make wrong assumptions of anyone who had the temerity...
  • User AvatarDave Orbison 28th Aug - 11:31pm
    Simon Shaw I didn't consider it accurate nor did I comment to that effect. Not for the first time, and no doubt not for the...