<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local councils and female representation: the 2008 figures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/local-councils-and-female-representation-the-2008-figures-6529.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/local-councils-and-female-representation-the-2008-figures-6529.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:55:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/local-councils-and-female-representation-the-2008-figures-6529.html#comment-71692</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=6529#comment-71692</guid>
		<description>I thought (but may be wrong) that women out-numbered men 2:1 on Islington council ...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought (but may be wrong) that women out-numbered men 2:1 on Islington council &#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Christie-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/local-councils-and-female-representation-the-2008-figures-6529.html#comment-71649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Christie-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=6529#comment-71649</guid>
		<description>Depends where the women are standing and what sort of candidate they are.  Are the majority of a parties female candidates in winnable wards.

Clearly you can&#039;t tell from these stats, so Mark, you cannot derive the conclusion that women are getting  less votes than men in comparable seats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends where the women are standing and what sort of candidate they are.  Are the majority of a parties female candidates in winnable wards.</p>
<p>Clearly you can&#8217;t tell from these stats, so Mark, you cannot derive the conclusion that women are getting  less votes than men in comparable seats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/local-councils-and-female-representation-the-2008-figures-6529.html#comment-71630</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=6529#comment-71630</guid>
		<description>They used to say that on average, women candidates got more votes than men. Is this no longer true then?

If true, then it would follow that for the number of women cllrs to stay constant, then the number of female candidates would have actually risen. I.e. that the lack of progress is lying more with the electorate than with parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They used to say that on average, women candidates got more votes than men. Is this no longer true then?</p>
<p>If true, then it would follow that for the number of women cllrs to stay constant, then the number of female candidates would have actually risen. I.e. that the lack of progress is lying more with the electorate than with parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

