Localism: it’s all Balls to Labour

It’s hard to believe, but Ed Balls was once credited with being a champion of ‘new localism’ within this Labour Government. This was what Mr Balls said back in 2002, before he was elected an MP, and was Gordon Brown’s right-hand at the Treasury:

In today’s complex world, it is simply not possible to run economic policy or deliver strong public services using the old, top-down, one-size fits all solutions. Excessive centralisation saps morale at local level. It destroys innovation and experimentation. It fails to allow different policy areas that must in fact be interconnected to be joined up”.

How true. And yet compare that statement with today’s announcement by the very same Ed Balls, now an MP and cabinet minister for children, schools and the family:

Ed Balls today set out the next phase of the Government’s School Improvement Strategy – National Challenge – to transform schools, raise results in English and maths, and tackle underachievement by young people. The Children’s Plan sets out that by 2020 at least 90 per cent of children will achieve the equivalent of five higher level GCSEs by age 19. … The Government will legislate to take new powers to direct local authorities to issue a warning notice where there is clear cause for concern – such as exam results getting worse; to appoint Interim Executive Boards where the school is under a warning notice; and to require a local authority to take on advisory services where there are large numbers of schools with unacceptably low standards.

Today’s announcement by the Government will fail, just as the hundreds which preceded them have done: not because the intentions are not good – who could be against schools aiming to do better? – but because Labour just does not understand that increasing centralisation will not deliver reform. It’s a truth that Labour is incapable of acknowledging, and why they are incapable of improving the quality of education in this country.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/2837 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • It’s not just a sledgehammer to crack a nut, it’s also completely inconsistent and hypocritical.
    In Watford Francis Combe school is on the list It was visited by Ed Balls in February, when he praised them for their improvement and leadership. The chances are they’ll meet the deadline (despite having a high number of pupils with special needs, and suffering the effects of grammar schools in the area). However, yesterday they are on the hit list. What kind of message is this sending to pupils and staff?

    It was also interesting that yesterday the IFS published a report saying that not all the money earmarked for pupils from low income families was being passed on by LEAs.
    http://www.ifs.org.uk/pr/sf_pr.pdf

    For these schools, who often do well on the added value index, taking in pupils from deprived background, often with special needs, it is vital that they get real practical resources to cut the cycle of poverty and low attainment.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 23rd Oct - 10:07am
    Ian, I live in Leicester and lived in Highfields for years after I went to Leicester University. It's not about dispersal policies. Communities are formed...
  • User AvatarDav 23rd Oct - 10:01am
    Are we moving towards quotas for B.A.M.E people and/or youthful and/or elderly people Some of those categories are not like the others... (a 'B.A.M.E. person'...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 23rd Oct - 9:59am
    Malcolm is right in both his last two comments. And Andrew Ducker's opening remark in this comments thread is one that deserve attention and thought....
  • User AvatarDenis 23rd Oct - 9:57am
    Are we moving towards quotas for B.A.M.E people and/or youthful and/or elderly people etc or is there deemed to be some unique contribution that only...
  • User AvatarAlan Marshall 23rd Oct - 9:47am
    There are clear trends or messages from the poll, although I agree that there are some terms that are vaguer than others. The top 4...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 23rd Oct - 9:47am
    @Stevan Rose 22nd Oct '14 - 10:45pm 'Sorry, Lib Dem participation in this undemocratic chamber is appalling. Hypocritical. Do what democrats in other countries do...