Localism: it’s all Balls to Labour

It’s hard to believe, but Ed Balls was once credited with being a champion of ‘new localism’ within this Labour Government. This was what Mr Balls said back in 2002, before he was elected an MP, and was Gordon Brown’s right-hand at the Treasury:

In today’s complex world, it is simply not possible to run economic policy or deliver strong public services using the old, top-down, one-size fits all solutions. Excessive centralisation saps morale at local level. It destroys innovation and experimentation. It fails to allow different policy areas that must in fact be interconnected to be joined up”.

How true. And yet compare that statement with today’s announcement by the very same Ed Balls, now an MP and cabinet minister for children, schools and the family:

Ed Balls today set out the next phase of the Government’s School Improvement Strategy – National Challenge – to transform schools, raise results in English and maths, and tackle underachievement by young people. The Children’s Plan sets out that by 2020 at least 90 per cent of children will achieve the equivalent of five higher level GCSEs by age 19. … The Government will legislate to take new powers to direct local authorities to issue a warning notice where there is clear cause for concern – such as exam results getting worse; to appoint Interim Executive Boards where the school is under a warning notice; and to require a local authority to take on advisory services where there are large numbers of schools with unacceptably low standards.

Today’s announcement by the Government will fail, just as the hundreds which preceded them have done: not because the intentions are not good – who could be against schools aiming to do better? – but because Labour just does not understand that increasing centralisation will not deliver reform. It’s a truth that Labour is incapable of acknowledging, and why they are incapable of improving the quality of education in this country.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/2837 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

One Comment

  • It’s not just a sledgehammer to crack a nut, it’s also completely inconsistent and hypocritical.
    In Watford Francis Combe school is on the list It was visited by Ed Balls in February, when he praised them for their improvement and leadership. The chances are they’ll meet the deadline (despite having a high number of pupils with special needs, and suffering the effects of grammar schools in the area). However, yesterday they are on the hit list. What kind of message is this sending to pupils and staff?

    It was also interesting that yesterday the IFS published a report saying that not all the money earmarked for pupils from low income families was being passed on by LEAs.
    http://www.ifs.org.uk/pr/sf_pr.pdf

    For these schools, who often do well on the added value index, taking in pupils from deprived background, often with special needs, it is vital that they get real practical resources to cut the cycle of poverty and low attainment.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohnTilley 19th Dec - 8:06pm
    Hywel 19th Dec '14 - 5:15pm Yes you are quite right Hywel. But you display a grip on reality apparently missing amongst our MPs, or...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 19th Dec - 8:01pm
    This reads like another one of those "Let's blame it all on Labour" excuses that the top of our party rolls out as a cover...
  • User Avatarsimon 19th Dec - 7:46pm
    "If we want to cut the deficit, we have to do it by taking money from those who have it. " That always works so...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 19th Dec - 7:37pm
    SpookyBird 19th Dec '14 - 6:37pm If you read my earlier two comments you will see that at no point have I tried to suggest...
  • User Avatarmalcolm blount 19th Dec - 7:35pm
    re lib support for con only govts---- liberals gave general support to minority lab govts--- 1924--both lloyd george & asquithian wings of libs agreed to...
  • User AvatarMark Argent 19th Dec - 7:22pm
    I first met this idea a long time ago, and it seems to be a brilliant idea, but one that might take some explaining. There...
Sat 20th Dec 2014
Sat 3rd Jan 2015
Wed 14th Jan 2015
Thu 15th Jan 2015
Fri 16th Jan 2015