Maria Miller’s appointment: have you forgotten what was said when Theresa May got the role?

Maria Miller’s appointment to, amongst other things, the Women and Equalities brief has received quite a lot of criticism from non-Conservatives today.

One part of that is wrong, but understandable – a simple mistake in not realising that the role she’s taken on isn’t the one Lynne Featherstone had but rather the one Theresa May had. As the BBC got this wrong, it’s no surprise many others followed in also getting it wrong, even though the accurate information is readily accessible in many places such as in Theresa May’s own write-up on the Home Office website. Not double-checking something the BBC reports is understandable (and I certainly don’t always do that!); it’s noticeable how long the erroneous information did the rounds on Twitter however.

Another part is a deeper mistake – and that’s the classic error of not comparing like with like. Judge a new appointee on their past voting record by all means, but it makes sense when doing so to all remember what the past voting record of their predecessor was at the time of appointment too.

Because if you do remember when Theresa May was appointed to the Women and Equalities brief, it was hardly without controversy. Take this from Liberal Conspiracy:

Outrage against Theresa May’s appointment grows
Outrage has been growing online over the appointment of Theresa May as the minister of equality despite her voting record.

All sounds very familiar, doesn’t it? Any sensible discussion wouldn’t therefore put Maria Miller’s voting record in the context of her predecessor’s voting record. Good thing we’re all sensible, isn’t it?

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.


  • Stephen Bradley 4th Sep '12 - 6:48pm

    I think you completely missed the point with this article – this story did the rounds on social media sites because it’s pretty shameful that the government has appointed a minister for “equality” who has voted in this way, clearly showing they don’t believe in the principle of equality. The fact that they’ve done this twice in a row is even more bizarre. Plus the fact that there are two ministers with equality in their title, and many people have got the wrong one doesn’t seem to be relevant! I think this is nothing more than an attempt to divert attention from the appointment itself.

  • Jessica Woolley 4th Sep '12 - 7:09pm

    Erm… I can still think that Maria Miller’s voting record is appalling – ‘putting it in context’ by comparing it with the equally drastic voting record of Theresa May doesn’t nullify this point. Or are you arguing that we shouldn’t complain because all women and equalities ministers are just as bad as each other? Logic like that won’t win many votes.

  • Mark, you’re forgetting that Theresa May publically announced that she had changed her mind about things she had previously voted against (such as gay adoption and the equality act), after she got the position. Assuming that this is unlikely to happen again, people are right to be very concerned.

  • ‘Assuming that this is unlikely to happen again’. It really sounds like you have given this woman a fair chance at expressing her current views Travis. If only you were in charge of equality, you seem like a very careful and balanced individual.

  • Simon Aplin 5th Sep '12 - 11:03am

    Are you trying to suggest that a minister’s voting record being entirely at odds with their posting is negated as a complaint because another minister who has held the position was also demonstrably unsuitable for the role? This sounds like an absurd position to take.

    Rather, you seem to be inadvertently highlighting that appointing demonstrably unsuitable ministers for the Women and Equalities brief is a pattern, which isn’t something to be lauded or a reason to ignore current mistakes.

  • Why do we need to compare Miller to May? You may as well debate the relative merits of suffocation vs drowning.

  • Matthew Wilkinson 5th Sep '12 - 1:01pm

    Ok, there’s no disputing the fact that this factual error has been mad by media outlets. Theresa May was her predecessor. Theresa May had a terrible voting record on these issues. Agreed. The point is that Cameron has not used this reshuffle as an opportunity to put someone more appropriate in the role. In that sense it is a step back: it is a missed opportunity. Frankly, I think the tone of your argument is misguided and pedantic.

  • James Sandbach 5th Sep '12 - 4:14pm

    Having any Minister (tory or lib dem) with a specific equalities brief in the Government seems to be tokenistic – the tories flirted with the equalities agenda in 2006-2009 but now seem to have reverted to quite hostile positions, seeing any anti-discrimination or equalties legislation as burdensome red-tape and attacking any equalities initiatives as ‘political correctness’. Am all for the social mobility agenda that has replaced it, but it is not the same thing. Having said that I really welcome Helen Grant’s appointment to the role – Helen has done fantastic work for domestic violence victims.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 28th Nov - 3:53pm
    Sarah Noble 28th Nov '15 - 3:22pm Sorry, you cannot know that, because of confidentiality. The use of extreme words, such as 'nobody', 'everybody', 'all',...
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 28th Nov - 3:53pm
    @nvelope2003 "Unless Jeremy Corbyn resigns there is no way he can be removed because the overwhelming majority of Labour Party members want him to stay."...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 28th Nov - 3:42pm
    Conor McGovern 28th Nov '15 - 1:11pm Of course not, he is his own man.
  • User AvatarSarah Noble 28th Nov - 3:22pm
    malc, Myra Hindley was imprisoned in Holloway for thirty years, and nobody demanded she be put in a male prison because she was a danger...
  • User Avatarnvelope2003 28th Nov - 3:18pm
    Andrew McCaig: other polls show a different picture. Support for air strikes does not necessarily indicate support for active involvement in the war. The outrage...
  • User AvatarBarry Stocker 28th Nov - 3:10pm
    The use of Smith rather than Mao for McDonnell to make his point would indeed have been more intelligent politics. I would certainly like to...