Measuring what Lib Dem members think the party is achieving in Coalition

Lib Dem Voice polled our members-only forum recently to discover what Lib Dem members think of various political issues, the Coalition, and the performance of key party figures. Some 550 party members have responded, and we’re publishing the full results.

Party members split on Lib Dem influence achieved within Coalition

How would you rate the extent of the Liberal Democrat influence within the Coalition Government, where 10 is highly influential, and 1 indicates no influence. (Comparison with September’s figures in brackets.)

    1: 1%
    2: 7%
    3: 17%
    4: 15%
    5: 11%
    Lacking influence = 51% (-2%)
    6: 17%
    7: 23%
    8: 8%
    9: 2%
    10: 1%
    Achieving influence = 49% (+2%)

This is the fifth time we’ve asked the party members who participate in LibDemVoice’s surveys this question, asking you to rank on a scale of 1-10 the level of influence you think the party is exerting within the Coalition.

In March, Lib Dem members felt by a margin of 67%-31% that the party was achieving influence within the Coalition government. However, this has dropped significantly in recent months — most noticeably when the Conservatives went broke their pledge to introduce an elected House of Lords in July, but also as a result of the Tories’ (and therefore to some extent at least the Government’s) significant shift to the right since the reshuffle.

For the second successive month, Lib Dem members now feel the party lacks influence by a narrow margin, 51%-49%. The average mark Lib Dems gave was 5.7 out of 10. The modal mark was 7/10.

  • Over 1,200 Lib Dem paid-up party members are registered with LibDemVoice.org. Some 550 responded to the latest survey, which was conducted between 28th and 31st October.
  • Please note: we make no claims that the survey is fully representative of the Lib Dem membership as a whole. However, LibDemVoice.org’s surveys are the largest independent samples of the views of Lib Dem members across the country, and have in the past offered accurate guides to what party members think.
  • For further information on the reliability/credibility of our surveys, please refer to FAQs: Are the Liberal Democrat Voice surveys of party members accurate? and polling expert Anthony Wells’ verdict, On that poll of Lib Dem members.
  • The full archive of our members’ surveys can be viewed at www.libdemvoice.org/category/ldv-members-poll
  • * Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from May 2007 to Jan 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

    Read more by .
    This entry was posted in LDV Members poll.
    Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31305 for Twitter and emails.
    Advert

    3 Comments

    • Averages hide the most striking observation – the distribution curve has two peaks.

      Clear evidence of a strong divide in the party over the coalition.

    • Andrew Martin 7th Nov '12 - 10:19am

      Not sure 5 should count as ‘lacking influence’ – in theory on a 1-10 basis it is in the lower half but psychologically most people think of it as a half-way marker.

    • paul barker 7th Nov '12 - 4:33pm

      If we look at the 3 highest votes they are for 7, pretty influential, with 6 & 3 equal second. The top 3 on their own take nearly 3/5ths of the votes.
      There is a clear split with the larger group going for more influence.
      I agree with Andrew Martins point, this would work better if the scale were 1-9 instead.

    Post a Comment

    Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

    If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

    Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *
    Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

    Advert



    Recent Comments

    • User AvatarBen Jephcott 1st Jul - 8:00pm
      This tone of this article is patronising and negative, though I can understand the view from unnamed ALDE staff (whom I presume are referred to...
    • User AvatarBill le Breton 1st Jul - 7:56pm
      A leader worth his salt is at ease with Conference - celebrates the wisdom of that particular crowd; appreciates the experience and talent of those...
    • User AvatarPaul Walter 1st Jul - 7:52pm
      Andrew, point taken. To be clear I was replying to, and only to, Mr Wallace.
    • User AvatarRichard Underhill 1st Jul - 7:37pm
      Sharon Bowles' position heading the banking committee was hugely important, but difficult to explain on the doorstep. In the 2009 to 2014 parliament the Liberal...
    • User AvatarTonyJ 1st Jul - 7:36pm
      Sammy - Yes people should have the right to criticise, but they should do so by name. Anonymous briefing is cowardly and pathetic. If the...
    • User AvatarTony Rowan-Wicks 1st Jul - 7:33pm
      Catherine has been, and continues to be, a great campaigner. That is why I have read her here and elsewhere and I am surprised that...
    Wed 1st Jul 2015
    Thu 2nd Jul 2015
    Fri 3rd Jul 2015
    Sat 4th Jul 2015
    10:00
    10:00
    Sun 5th Jul 2015
    03:00
    Mon 6th Jul 2015
    Wed 8th Jul 2015
    Thu 9th Jul 2015
    Fri 10th Jul 2015
    Sat 11th Jul 2015
    Sun 12th Jul 2015
    Thu 16th Jul 2015
    Sat 18th Jul 2015
    Sun 19th Jul 2015
    Thu 23rd Jul 2015
    Sat 25th Jul 2015
    Sun 26th Jul 2015
    Mon 27th Jul 2015