<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memo to the party re: Bones Commission – time to get with the Internet!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/memo-to-the-party-re-bones-commission-time-to-get-with-the-internet-3056.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/memo-to-the-party-re-bones-commission-time-to-get-with-the-internet-3056.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hywel Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/memo-to-the-party-re-bones-commission-time-to-get-with-the-internet-3056.html#comment-56706</link>
		<dc:creator>Hywel Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3056#comment-56706</guid>
		<description>Jo is right to draw the distinction.  Which is why I think talk of a conference debate is wrong.  The &quot;debate&quot; took place in the consultation/submission period so unless there is constitutional change needed (and I&#039;m not convinced given how wide the constitution is drawn) it&#039;s not something for conference to debate.

We elect the FE to manage the party - and the sorts of change this report was about come firmly within their competence.

AFAICS the FE has now endorsed this report so all the &quot;communication with stakeholders&quot; has been done.

Mind you I bet it will be a lot more exciting a report as a secret than it will in reality :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jo is right to draw the distinction.  Which is why I think talk of a conference debate is wrong.  The &#8220;debate&#8221; took place in the consultation/submission period so unless there is constitutional change needed (and I&#8217;m not convinced given how wide the constitution is drawn) it&#8217;s not something for conference to debate.</p>
<p>We elect the FE to manage the party &#8211; and the sorts of change this report was about come firmly within their competence.</p>
<p>AFAICS the FE has now endorsed this report so all the &#8220;communication with stakeholders&#8221; has been done.</p>
<p>Mind you I bet it will be a lot more exciting a report as a secret than it will in reality <img src='http://www.libdemvoice.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Christie-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/memo-to-the-party-re-bones-commission-time-to-get-with-the-internet-3056.html#comment-56705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Christie-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3056#comment-56705</guid>
		<description>You know, they are making text book &#039;business change&#039; mistakes; the first of which, Stephen, you have rightly idenitified as not giving a date for when the next piece of news will come out.

They&#039;re treating the communication of organisational change as if it were a policy announcement: big mistake, they&#039;re very different things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, they are making text book &#8216;business change&#8217; mistakes; the first of which, Stephen, you have rightly idenitified as not giving a date for when the next piece of news will come out.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re treating the communication of organisational change as if it were a policy announcement: big mistake, they&#8217;re very different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Ashton</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/memo-to-the-party-re-bones-commission-time-to-get-with-the-internet-3056.html#comment-56678</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Ashton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3056#comment-56678</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the betting that one of the recommendations of the Bones Report will be to improve internal communications?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the betting that one of the recommendations of the Bones Report will be to improve internal communications?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Morton</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/memo-to-the-party-re-bones-commission-time-to-get-with-the-internet-3056.html#comment-56668</link>
		<dc:creator>David Morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3056#comment-56668</guid>
		<description>I doubt a pillar of the establishment and A lister like Stephen needs my support however this is a very posting. I doubt there is any vast right wing  conspiracy going on. However in the interweb age you can get infomation to people very quickly and the silence so far on Bones was only ever going to be filled with rumours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt a pillar of the establishment and A lister like Stephen needs my support however this is a very posting. I doubt there is any vast right wing  conspiracy going on. However in the interweb age you can get infomation to people very quickly and the silence so far on Bones was only ever going to be filled with rumours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

