<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Gove runs into a little interview trouble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/michael-gove-runs-into-a-little-interivew-trouble-3163.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/michael-gove-runs-into-a-little-interivew-trouble-3163.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: asquith</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/michael-gove-runs-into-a-little-interivew-trouble-3163.html#comment-58605</link>
		<dc:creator>asquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3163#comment-58605</guid>
		<description>Is there a link to the actual interview, then? 

Having said that, it&#039;s unlikely that I&#039;ll change my mind on Gove, whom I&#039;ve unrelentingly despised ever since he (as a &quot;right-wing polemicist&quot;) praised Blair, a view reinforced by his unprincipled &quot;stance&quot; on 42 days &amp; general neoconservatism, a stance he shares with Gideon Osborne. Probably not with Camoron, but who&#039;s to say what Camoron will actually do given that he&#039;s one of nature&#039;s happy followers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a link to the actual interview, then? </p>
<p>Having said that, it&#8217;s unlikely that I&#8217;ll change my mind on Gove, whom I&#8217;ve unrelentingly despised ever since he (as a &#8220;right-wing polemicist&#8221;) praised Blair, a view reinforced by his unprincipled &#8220;stance&#8221; on 42 days &amp; general neoconservatism, a stance he shares with Gideon Osborne. Probably not with Camoron, but who&#8217;s to say what Camoron will actually do given that he&#8217;s one of nature&#8217;s happy followers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Heigham</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/michael-gove-runs-into-a-little-interivew-trouble-3163.html#comment-58534</link>
		<dc:creator>David Heigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=3163#comment-58534</guid>
		<description>Michael Gove should know better!

Of course Tories are unreformed. If the were reformed, most of them would be LibDems, wouldn&#039;t they?

And most Tories tend to be happy, not grumpy. See all the current academic research showing &quot;conservatives tend to be happier than liberals&quot;. Those I know grumble; but in a happy, traditional, non-grumpy way.

Of course, Michael Gove may have those non-conservative Tories in mind who are on the point of defecting to UKIP and points right. If they are &quot;most Tories&quot; he and David Cameron have reason to be worried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Gove should know better!</p>
<p>Of course Tories are unreformed. If the were reformed, most of them would be LibDems, wouldn&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>And most Tories tend to be happy, not grumpy. See all the current academic research showing &#8220;conservatives tend to be happier than liberals&#8221;. Those I know grumble; but in a happy, traditional, non-grumpy way.</p>
<p>Of course, Michael Gove may have those non-conservative Tories in mind who are on the point of defecting to UKIP and points right. If they are &#8220;most Tories&#8221; he and David Cameron have reason to be worried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

