Mike Tuffrey writes… London isn’t working – and the Mayor is asleep on the job

Today 397,000 Londoners are unemployed and looking for a job. As a region, we have the lowest level of skills in the workforce, based on NVQ Level 1 and above. And the problems are getting worse, as we fail to recover fast enough from the cardiac arrest that Labour’s last years in office dealt to the national economy.

Not a pretty picture for our great capital city, powerhouse (so we keep saying) of the whole UK economy.

In fact, weren’t the Olympics meant to help drive forward our economy? A couple of news stories from July sum up for me what’s wrong with the London economy.

Only one in ten of the people employed on the Olympic site were previously unemployed and only a quarter live in the five neighbouring boroughs where deprivation is among the highest in London.

Meanwhile more than 10,000 people applied for just 750 jobs at the new John Lewis store scheduled to open in the new Westfield shopping centre at Stratford.

So the employment picture in London is clear: plenty of people looking for work but they have too few of the right skills; not enough entry-level jobs; not enough training for the available work; and not enough targeting of help where it’s most needed.

The business picture is clear too: lots of focus on our ‘world class’ financial services sector and not enough on the small business sector nor on where the sustainable wealth-creating jobs of the future are going to come from.

And from our Mayor – who has a legal duty to set the economic development strategy for London – we hear far more about cutting personal tax rates for the City fat cats than on challenging the banks to lend to small firms.

In fact Boris Johnson did go to the City when he set up his Mayor’s Fund to get philanthropic donations for charity projects. But where’s the Mayor’s Fund for jobs and business – getting the banks to invest long term debt or equity in SMEs and the green industries of the future? Why not a Green Investment Bank for London? What about jobs from a massive home insulation programme?

And Boris Johnson has talked a lot about apprenticeships – claiming credit for more than 20,000 (although only 2,000 are in GLA agencies and contractors directly, and many of those are existing opportunities represented). But where’s the ambition to get hold of our share of the £4 billion skills budget from national government, sit the big employers round the table with the FE colleges and training providers, and get the fundamental mismatch between skills and jobs sorted out?

I say we need a mayor with ambition for London, who will do the things Boris Johnson isn’t doing.

I go further and say that big firms should put their procurement on Compete4, the database set up for the Olympics to help small firms bid for contracts. Large companies should give priority to local purchasing, where it makes sense, to keep buying power in the London economy.

Nationally the business secretary, Vince Cable, says we need to go beyond cutting the deficit and also invest in growing the economy – what he calls Plan-A-Plus. Unfortunately in London we have a classic laissez-faire Conservative Mayor with no vision for a GLA that intervenes to get the economy moving.

That’s bad enough now. But with new powers over business rates, development tax and borrowing coming to London next year, we need a Mayor with real ambition. Until then, ordinary Londoners will go on paying a heavy price in rising unemployment and low skill jobs.

Mike Tuffrey AM speaks for the Liberal Democrats at City Hall on housing, planning and finance and is running to be LibDem candidate for Mayor of London.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in London and Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/24921 for Twitter and emails.

6 Comments

  • I suggest that, in the forthcoming London Mayoral Elections, the people of London elect Brian Haley. Brian has a good record as a Councillor and an excellent grasp of the problems of real people, and the problems of local people. He is a man who has come from an ordinary background – he is not one of the “silver spoon brigade” – he is a realist with a sound grasp of the real issues which are worrying the people of London. He will champion the needs and aspirations of young people and of those who fell disillusioned.

    Take a look at this page – you can see that he has an excellent track record already – a vote for him could save the volatile situation in London because he knows where people are coming from.

    http://www.mayorwatch.co.uk/getting-the-liberal-democrat-message-to-the-local-and-national-electorate/201116085

  • **feel** disillusioned.

  • Daniel Henry 9th Aug '11 - 12:38pm

    Strange place to plug an article for Haley. Wouldn’t it be better to persuade him to address us with an article on here rather than hi-jacking someone else’s?

    Anyhow, Brian comes across as a decent candidate with some good credentials but I’ve not really seen anything from him that’s set this competition alight.

    Mike, in comparison has a very exciting vision for london backed up with some very strong policies and the benefit of years of experience in the GLA.
    http://miketuffrey.com/mike-tuffrey-london-plan/

    If he could successfully communicate this to the voting public then we could potentially have a great mayor in charge of London.

  • @Daniel – I take your point, but that was not my intention at all. Apologies to Mike – put it down to a “senior moment” on my part! I am not one of the cognoscenti!

  • Daniel Henry 11th Aug '11 - 1:51am

    Ah, fair enough.
    For what it’s worth I enjoyed the article! :)

    Btw, I meant it when I said it would be gods to hear more from Brian on here. He posted an introduction to himself but didn’t say anything specific on policy to stand out. A post outlining his policies, our perhaps his take on the London riots would be a good read.

  • @Daniel – I’m already on to it! :)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarHelen Dudden 24th Apr - 9:39am
    There are of course two sides to the situation. This is long standing, and as we celebrate Passover and the land that for some was...
  • User Avatarsfk 24th Apr - 9:28am
    I agree, voter contact and knowledgable local branches beat a centralised automated system hands down. There's a parallel trend in retail banking if you torture...
  • User AvatarTony Rowan-Wicks 24th Apr - 9:18am
    Totally agree with Caron. It struck me as wrong for a party which believes in voter listings in elections being completed 1 2 3 etc....
  • User AvatarRC 24th Apr - 9:13am
    @ Peter Watson A very good question given 20/20 hindsight/wisdom *after the event*. However: 1) All the evidence at the time said it would save...
  • User AvatarAustin Rathe 24th Apr - 8:31am
    David, we have never (in our surveys) asked any questions about the performance of individuals. Lib Dem Voice do ask those questions in their own...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 24th Apr - 8:31am
    I wouldn't be so sure about that, Caractacus. In Scotland, the Lib Dems have been praised by NUS for persuading the SNP Government to minimise...