<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ming to Dave: Get Lost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11312</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11312</guid>
		<description>Greg Dyke is listed on the Electoral Commissison web site as having donated to the Lib Dems in the run up to the 2005 General Election (and not to any other Party)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Dyke is listed on the Electoral Commissison web site as having donated to the Lib Dems in the run up to the 2005 General Election (and not to any other Party)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal First</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11301</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal First</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11301</guid>
		<description>Not quite true, the party can&#039;t find three suitable candidates, one of which has to be a woman, for a shortlist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite true, the party can&#8217;t find three suitable candidates, one of which has to be a woman, for a shortlist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11291</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11291</guid>
		<description>Just a shame that in this increasingly &#039;liberal&#039; city the regional party can&#039;t find anyone suitable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a shame that in this increasingly &#8216;liberal&#8217; city the regional party can&#8217;t find anyone suitable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter McGrath</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11285</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11285</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see the party take this line: no pacts.  If there&#039;s an hung parliament and the Lib Dems hold the balance our MPs judge each bill on its liberal merits.  Is it intrusive of personal lives and data, does it further trammel civil liberties, does it reduce freedom, does it centralise power, does it weaken the nation&#039;s security?    If its illiberal, it doesn&#039;t get LD MPs support.  That could be a non-negotiable position that could sit alongside the &#039;we&#039;re going for the maximum number of seats&#039; line that Ming has to say.    I suspect in a hung parliament both Brown and Cameron would set up set up Grandma selling market stalls to be able to get form an administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see the party take this line: no pacts.  If there&#8217;s an hung parliament and the Lib Dems hold the balance our MPs judge each bill on its liberal merits.  Is it intrusive of personal lives and data, does it further trammel civil liberties, does it reduce freedom, does it centralise power, does it weaken the nation&#8217;s security?    If its illiberal, it doesn&#8217;t get LD MPs support.  That could be a non-negotiable position that could sit alongside the &#8216;we&#8217;re going for the maximum number of seats&#8217; line that Ming has to say.    I suspect in a hung parliament both Brown and Cameron would set up set up Grandma selling market stalls to be able to get form an administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leon</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11278</link>
		<dc:creator>leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/ming-to-dave-get-lost-683.html#comment-11278</guid>
		<description>Unity has an interesting little theory on why Iain Dale stirred this up:

http://www.ministryoftruth.org.uk/2007/04/18/backing-boles/#comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unity has an interesting little theory on why Iain Dale stirred this up:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ministryoftruth.org.uk/2007/04/18/backing-boles/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.ministryoftruth.org.uk/2007/04/18/backing-boles/#comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

