<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More power for cities over skills budgets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/more-power-for-cities-over-skills-budgets-16574.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/more-power-for-cities-over-skills-budgets-16574.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/more-power-for-cities-over-skills-budgets-16574.html#comment-100998</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=16574#comment-100998</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;UK business leaders have become so fed-up with our skills system that they’re now refusing even to discuss it. Asked what the priorities for skills reform should be over the next five years at one of the recent party conferences, one prominent business leader rolled his eyes and replied with a sigh, ‘I’m not interested in talking about that, it’s boring. What’s the point?’&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Seriously - &lt;i&gt;one&lt;/i&gt; prominent business leader saying &quot;boooriing&quot; equates to &quot;UK business leaders have become so fed up with our skills system [our &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt;, by the way?] that they&#039;re refusing to discuss it&quot;? The quality of analysis in these &quot;Centre for Cities&quot; posts hasn&#039;t got any better, has it? Isn&#039;t analysis and argument what think tanks are supposed to be good at? Sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>UK business leaders have become so fed-up with our skills system that they’re now refusing even to discuss it. Asked what the priorities for skills reform should be over the next five years at one of the recent party conferences, one prominent business leader rolled his eyes and replied with a sigh, ‘I’m not interested in talking about that, it’s boring. What’s the point?’</p></blockquote>
<p>Seriously &#8211; <i>one</i> prominent business leader saying &#8220;boooriing&#8221; equates to &#8220;UK business leaders have become so fed up with our skills system [our <i>what</i>, by the way?] that they&#8217;re refusing to discuss it&#8221;? The quality of analysis in these &#8220;Centre for Cities&#8221; posts hasn&#8217;t got any better, has it? Isn&#8217;t analysis and argument what think tanks are supposed to be good at? Sheesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/more-power-for-cities-over-skills-budgets-16574.html#comment-100992</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/?p=16574#comment-100992</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;UK business leaders have become so fed-up with our skills system ...&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

I was not aware that we had a &quot;skills system&quot;.  More like an expensive alphabet soup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;UK business leaders have become so fed-up with our skills system &#8230;&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I was not aware that we had a &#8220;skills system&#8221;.  More like an expensive alphabet soup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

