MORE SHOCK NEWS: Bill that was going to be in Queen’s Speech will be in Queen’s Speech

Pick and mix your allocation of blame between some Tory right-wing MPs and some political journalists, between deliberate deceit and genuine confusion as you wish, but as the dust settles on yesterday’s political stories about the Queen’s Speech the news is remarkably dull:

  • A Bill that was not going to be in the Queen’s Speech will not be in the Queen’s Speech, and
  • A Bill that was going to be in the Queen’s Speech will be in the Queen’s Speech.

Or in other words, ignore the nonsense about how the absence of an equal marriage Bill from the Queen’s Speech means the government is backing away from it. The plan never was for the Bill to be in this Queen’s Speech, which is after all why the current Home Office consultation on the issue does not close for a couple of months yet. (Have you taken part in it? If not, you can do so online here.)

As Lynne Featherstone put it yesterday:

There will be no u-turn on equal marriage – we are committed as a government to legislate by 2015.

As for Lords reform, that too is proceeding as planned – which means that it will be in the Queen’s speech. Ministers have been saying, shock horror, that the economy is the most important issue at the moment and so in that sense Lords reform is not the “centrepiece” of the government’s plans for the next year. Hardly objectionable, hardly surprising and hardly news.

Even the keenest on Lords reform, such as myself, happily agree that the economy comes first – but simply add the even more obvious point that there is rather more to what the government can do than simply one Bill. Lords reform does not stop a myriad of other actions (especially on the economy where getting new legislation through Parliament is a relatively small part of what can or should be done).

As Nick Clegg puts it today, there are three priorities for him in the coming year – of which number three is political reform:

The historic mission of liberals is to stand up for ordinary people against vested interests. Our radicalism is needed as much as ever. Reining in the banks. Reforming party funding to get the big money out of politics. Cleaning up the media: every Lib Dem can be proud of the part we played in setting up the judge-led Leveson inquiry. And, yes, injecting some democracy into the House of Lords. For more than a century, we have been debating the commonsense idea that the people who obey the laws of the land should elect the people who make them. Instead of getting ourselves tied up in knots in Westminster about this, we just need to get on with it.

I suspect we may get plenty more of this ‘no news’ news served up in the coming months. Whether mischief-making political opponents are encouraged to try that on more and more will be governed by whether journalists swallow the stories and also by how Liberal Democrats react. We can’t control the journalists, but whether our reactions encourage more mischief-making in the future is very much up to us.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarmalc 24th May - 12:23am
    @Graham Evans ‘While the IRA did not explicitly set out to kill civilians,’ You obviously don't recall Gerry Adams saying the families of British servicemen/women...
  • User AvatarIan Sanderson (RM3) 23rd May - 10:30pm
    @Graham Evans 'While the IRA did not explicitly set out to kill civilians,' That's a really fallacious argument. In the Northern Ireland troubles, all terrorist...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 23rd May - 9:47pm
    @Glenn " I must admit I just assumed that there was a mechanism that took into account the possibility of a national crisis." In 2001...
  • User AvatarRichard S 23rd May - 9:41pm
    @nvelope2003 - conspiracy type offences (to cause explosions?) already exist.
  • User AvatarRichard S 23rd May - 9:38pm
    @Jayne. So would you support another day off campaigning in memory of the thousands of people who have died of cancer since the start of...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 23rd May - 9:32pm
    @ Michael Cole "There’s no money left". See National Audit Office above. 1964 : Tory chancellor Reginald Maudling, to Jim Callaghan: “Sorry to leave it...