When site founder Rob Fenwick started Lib Dem Voice he made it perfectly clear readers would have to go elsewhere if they wanted to obsess about the ups-and-downs of political opinion polls.
He had, and has, a valid point.
Newspaper coverage of opinion polls is inevitably sensationalist; after all, they want to get their money’s worth of coverage. Even sites like PoliticalBetting.com increasingly try and read trends into even the smallest of fluctuations in support, well within the margin of error. The best, and usually pretty impartial, analysis of the polls is written by Tory activist Anthony Wells, over at YouGov’s UK Polling Report blog.
Equally, Lib Dem Voice attracts its fair share of political anoraks, who positively salivate over each and every opinion poll.
The question is, therefore: should Lib Dem Voice report opinion polls when they are published? And what better way to settle the issue than by conducting our own poll? It’s now live (see right), and the three possible options are straightforward:
Yes, LDV should report opinion polls;
No, it shouldn’t;
Only if they’re good for the Lib Dems
Over to you…
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Opinion: Land Value Tax - an old idea with lots of modern supporters
Which of the five Lib Dem reshuffle options will Nick Clegg pick?
In praise of Councillor Neil Hughes - 56 Up
Lynne Featherstone's honeycomb surprise
Opinion: A letter to a constituent regarding equal marriage
Opinion: The future of the CAP – specific proposals by Liberal Democrats
Willie Rennie’s first year as Scottish Liberal Democrat Leader
John Leech MP writes… It is not just the Leader’s job to sell the Pupil Premium
Opinion: A letter to a constituent regarding equal marriage
Transport for London are still in denial over Oyster overcharging
Hollande. Not a good dancer.
Tim Farron MP writes... Send in your nominations for Party Awards 2012
Conway Hall, against discrimination (Unless it's Transphobia)
The Open University Society of Change Ringers
Friday favourite 59
Cross-platform Follow Friday #ff
Stockport seeks volunteers to help marshal Olympic Torch relay
Alex Sabine
Cogload
Joe Bourke
Richard Dean
12 Comments
Absolutely yes – almost everyone who reads Lib Dem Voice will discuss them anyway so why not a party discussion?
Yes, whilst being realistic and avoiding a reactionary, sensationalist Fleet Street-esque approach.
In defence of politicalbetting.com, Smithson may use slightly sensational headlines but mainly as questions in order to stimulate debate (“ie. “More Problems for Dave?”), rather than stating directly that a slight fluctuation is more telling than it is. He also looks at polling trends over time, and the methodological robustness of each pollster.
Why does it tell me to stuff the ballot box elsewhere when I try and vote?
Maybe have a ‘Polls’ section in addition to ‘News’ & ‘Opinion’ so those interested can get down dirty, and those not can, er, not.
Of course we should. If you are reading this then you are choosing to look at Liberal Democrat Voice. Face it, you are a political anorak. Let’s not be embarrassed about this.
Love the quote Stuart. Semi-guilty.
I have a poll about whether LDV should have polls about whether LDV should cover polls…
More seriously, would your effort not be better spent on policy or reporting.
Why not syndicate the UKPollingReport feed – either just the headlines or the content too.
Use the right plugin, and you could syndicate it *and* allow comments here. Courtesy would indicate asking Anthony if you are going to allow comments on a syndicated feed.
Matt
You can be a political anorak and still think polls are the most pointless thing since the Spice Girls’ reunion tour…
No. I read LD Voice as our own party vox pop; to read and exchange views on our own party policies.
It is communication at a more effective and personal level than the letters page of LD News.
There are many areas of LD policy that need to be kicked around a bit.
I also read PB eagerly for the polls, but they are a different thing, just a snapshot of trends and not really significant unless you are a punter.
There are some six or more polls a month and if you clutter up the site with ths you will dilute the discussion forum element.
Elizabeth Patterson
For PB.com readers minor fluctuations in polls can be significant if they affect the longer term markets (eg seat spreads)
Mind you if I want polling data I go to UKpollingreport.co.uk. More than enough there to keep people happy
Success depends on and demands using every tool at your disposal at some point; the pure subjectivity of polls requires that it is properly sectioned and compartmentalised to clarify the boundary between the nitty-gritty policy talk and the speculative opining of any loud-mouths who choose to open up on here at LDVoice.
If the details of polls are posted they should be all polls from reputable companies and not just be the headlines.
We should if possible publish more of the information. Look at the recent poll which showed Cameron as incredibly unpopular – the choices offered did not include one obvious option casting doubt onto the headline result.
No. Signal is dwarfed by noise in the latest poll. If they must be covered, do a round up once per quarter based on a moving average.