Next week in the Lords… 10-14 December

Firstly, my apologies for missing a few weeks, mostly due to a rather hectic diary. So, where were we?…

It has to be said that next week is a relatively quiet week for the Liberal Democrats, with no oral questions scheduled, although Monday does see some Liberal Democrat ministerial action, with Jim Wallace taking the Second Reading of the Partnerships (Prosecution) (Scotland) Bill, which is intended to make provision for the prosecution in Scotland of partnerships, partners and others following dissolution or changes in membership. More important, probably, is Day 3 of the Report Stage of the Crime and Courts Bill, which will see an amendment to remove the offence of “scandalising the judiciary” (Amendment 113A), and perhaps more interestingly, Amendment 113C which seeks to provide greater clarity over the right of householders to take proportionate action in defence of their property. meanwhile, Eric Avebury will continue his efforts to defend the rights of asylum seekers in the immigration appeals system. The day will conclude with a short debate, moved by Robin Teverson, on the implementation of an energy efficiency strategy.

Never let it be said that the Lords is out of touch with current affairs, and Tuesday sees an oral question from Labour’s Lord Dubs on preventing companies with significant operations in the UK from being based in a tax haven to avoid UK taxes, followed by a short debate moved by the Bishop of Derby on the impact of multinational companies’ financial practices and the UK’s tax policies on developing countries. In Grand Committee, Dick Newby will be taking the Financial Restrictions (Iran) Order 2012 for a spin. The direction prohibits new transactions or business relationships with Iranian banks, their branches and subsidiaries, and the Central Bank of Iran, or continuing to participate in transactions or business relationships with them.

Wednesday sees Day 4 of the Report Stage of the Courts and Crime Bill, whilst Tom McNally takes the Statute Law (Repeals) Bill through its Committee Stage. From the Labour benches, Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town will be probing the government’s intentions on a register of lobbyists, a subject which has seemingly disappeared off the radar in recent months.

Probably the most interesting, and little noticed debate on Thursday is a Short Debate in Grand Committee on the European Union Committee’s report on ‘Deprived Persons Fund: Recommendation for a Reasoned Opinion’. This is an attempt by the European Commission to involve itself in providing food to those in poverty across Europe, and it is felt by the Committee that this is an unwarranted interference in the social programmes of the member states.

It’s a sitting Friday, which means a debate, and an interesting one it is too, as the outgoing Archbishop of Canterbury will move a discussion on the place and contribution of older people in society. I doubt that he’s looking for some tips on how to spend his suddenly free time, but we may get an idea as to what he’s planning to get involved with in the years ahead.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32007 for Twitter and emails.

3 Comments

  • James Sandbach 8th Dec '12 - 10:34am

    I’m disappointed at Tom McNally’s handling of the defeated laspo Order and vote on Monday – how petulant can a minister be at the dispatch box – withdrawing an honest undertaking in a fit of pique because of the lords exercising its role of a revising chamber; please complain to Ros etc..

  • Kirsten de Keyser 10th Dec '12 - 1:04am

    THURSDAY at 2PM also sees a highly apposite debate,
    Equality and discrimination affecting Israel’s Arab citizens – called by The Lord Bishop of Exeter.
    Given recent and ongoing events in the Middle East, it’s hard to imagine a debate with greater potential charge.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Chegwyn 19th Apr - 1:29am
    I think the Falklands War in 82 had something to do with that turn round Bill.
  • User AvatarDuncan Brack 18th Apr - 11:46pm
    David White - you are right about Beveridge (except that 1945 couldn't be called a khaki election - unlike 1900, for which the term is...
  • User Avatarmalc 18th Apr - 10:51pm
    Mark Valladares Sorry I shouldn't have said military bases, but we do - or may be did until recently, not sure after defence cuts -...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 18th Apr - 10:24pm
    But what be the biggest shift for a Governing Party over a period of 13 months? Try December 81 to Jan 83. If potential turn...
  • User AvatarEd Wilson 18th Apr - 10:12pm
    Let's try again. "...power 4 million homes..." means onshore wind produces a number of kilowatt hours which, when divided by the notional power consumption of...
  • User AvatarRoland 18th Apr - 9:56pm
    A scary thought has just occurred - the Pensions Minister either doesn't actually know or want us to know, just how much pension tax relief...