Next week in the Lords: 4-7 February

House of LordsStrangely enough, in the absence of a Lords Reform Bill to debate (and who’s sorry now?), things are relatively quiet on the red benches. Quiet, but not exactly dead, I’m delighted to say. And now that Paddy Ashdown has hit Twitter, life is going to be a bit more exciting. And talking of Twitter, don’t forget that our Parliamentary Party in the Lords has its own Twitter feed. And yes, those are real Peers tweeting, in live time. So, what might they be covering next week?

On Monday, business kicks off with, amongst other things, an oral question from Hugh Dykes on derogations and opt-outs from European Union legislation (how many do we have now?). The Committee Stage of the Growth and Infrastructure Bill reaches Day 4, whilst the Mental Health (Discrimination) (No. 2) Bill reaches its Committee Stage. This is intended to repeal legislative provisions that can prevent people with mental health conditions from serving as Members of Parliament, members of the devolved legislatures, jurors, or company directors. Having successfully been passed in the Commons, and having received support from all benches in the Lords at Second Reading, this is expected to have a trouble free passage.

Meanwhile, in Grand Committee, Margaret Sharp will be opening a debate following up the report of the Science and Technology Committee on Science and Heritage, and in the Committee corridor, the Economic Affairs Finance Bill Sub-Committee will be taking evidence from senior HMRC officials on matters relating to international corporate taxation. I’m guessing that all of those suggesting that multinationals are undertaxed will never notice what takes place there, which is a pity really…

Tuesday sees the Report Stage of the Scrap Dealers Bill, good news if you’re a church warden or run a railway, although it did see a Government amendment seeking a sunset clause defeated by 89 votes to 31. This is followed by the Report Stage of the Defamation Bill, to be welcomed by anyone who believes in free speech. Continuing the tax theme, Lord Harrison (Labour) has an oral question on resources and staff for the full collection of tax (not enough of either is the gist of his approach, I expect).

Liberal Democrat Peers are a caring bunch, and on Wednesday, John Sharkey and Chris Rennard perform a double act, asking questions on factors contributing to the rise in childhood obesity and on helping people reduce their sugar consumption respectively. Lord Howarth of Newport seeks to take advantage of the Coalition’s problems with constitutional reform by asking whether the Government intend to proceed with any reforms of the composition of the House of Lords. Admittedly, he might be better off taking that to whatever committee is drawing up Labour’s 2015 manifesto, but… Oh, and yes, the Growth and Infrastructure Bill continues through its Committee Stage…

There is, I guess, a certain irony from the perspective of your author, that the week comes to a close on Thursday with a short debate on the role of civil society in promoting peace in Israel and Palestine, courtesy of Kishwer Falkner.

Finally, don’t forget that the Liberal Democrat Peers have their own group blog, which is well worth a read.

* Mark Valladares is mildly irritated that his future involves travelling to London on days when his wife will be in Suffolk…

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 18th Aug - 2:35am
    @ Joe Bouke “A startling statistic is the projection of 250,000 extra households a year until 2033.” I have not seen this forecast. I had...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 18th Aug - 2:33am
    @ Nonconformistradical “On what do you base your choice of arbitrary cut-off year?” If I can justify 1971 is it arbitrary? 2017-67+21 = 1971 You...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 18th Aug - 1:10am
    John writes a very clever and interesting piece, we could do more of this, radical centre stuff and get somewhere with a slate of policies....
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 18th Aug - 12:59am
    As ever terrific responses from Katharine and Catherine, we need you both , and do not want this absurd policy idea to water down our...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 18th Aug - 12:48am
    Three contributions show why my kind of approach here , centre ,centre left , radical and moderate centre , centre left , is the essence...
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 17th Aug - 11:09pm
    frankie - On contracts etc - The Posted Workers Directives are a big problem though. See here, p27 and p36-40 in particular http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/579001/IPOL_STU(2016)579001_EN.pdf If some...