Next week in the Lords: 4-7 February

House of LordsStrangely enough, in the absence of a Lords Reform Bill to debate (and who’s sorry now?), things are relatively quiet on the red benches. Quiet, but not exactly dead, I’m delighted to say. And now that Paddy Ashdown has hit Twitter, life is going to be a bit more exciting. And talking of Twitter, don’t forget that our Parliamentary Party in the Lords has its own Twitter feed. And yes, those are real Peers tweeting, in live time. So, what might they be covering next week?

On Monday, business kicks off with, amongst other things, an oral question from Hugh Dykes on derogations and opt-outs from European Union legislation (how many do we have now?). The Committee Stage of the Growth and Infrastructure Bill reaches Day 4, whilst the Mental Health (Discrimination) (No. 2) Bill reaches its Committee Stage. This is intended to repeal legislative provisions that can prevent people with mental health conditions from serving as Members of Parliament, members of the devolved legislatures, jurors, or company directors. Having successfully been passed in the Commons, and having received support from all benches in the Lords at Second Reading, this is expected to have a trouble free passage.

Meanwhile, in Grand Committee, Margaret Sharp will be opening a debate following up the report of the Science and Technology Committee on Science and Heritage, and in the Committee corridor, the Economic Affairs Finance Bill Sub-Committee will be taking evidence from senior HMRC officials on matters relating to international corporate taxation. I’m guessing that all of those suggesting that multinationals are undertaxed will never notice what takes place there, which is a pity really…

Tuesday sees the Report Stage of the Scrap Dealers Bill, good news if you’re a church warden or run a railway, although it did see a Government amendment seeking a sunset clause defeated by 89 votes to 31. This is followed by the Report Stage of the Defamation Bill, to be welcomed by anyone who believes in free speech. Continuing the tax theme, Lord Harrison (Labour) has an oral question on resources and staff for the full collection of tax (not enough of either is the gist of his approach, I expect).

Liberal Democrat Peers are a caring bunch, and on Wednesday, John Sharkey and Chris Rennard perform a double act, asking questions on factors contributing to the rise in childhood obesity and on helping people reduce their sugar consumption respectively. Lord Howarth of Newport seeks to take advantage of the Coalition’s problems with constitutional reform by asking whether the Government intend to proceed with any reforms of the composition of the House of Lords. Admittedly, he might be better off taking that to whatever committee is drawing up Labour’s 2015 manifesto, but… Oh, and yes, the Growth and Infrastructure Bill continues through its Committee Stage…

There is, I guess, a certain irony from the perspective of your author, that the week comes to a close on Thursday with a short debate on the role of civil society in promoting peace in Israel and Palestine, courtesy of Kishwer Falkner.

Finally, don’t forget that the Liberal Democrat Peers have their own group blog, which is well worth a read.

* Mark Valladares is mildly irritated that his future involves travelling to London on days when his wife will be in Suffolk…

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32967 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarStuart 27th Nov - 9:44pm
    @Conor McGovern "If it were Christian terrorists, would their religion be brought up on the news and by the papers?" I would have thought the...
  • User AvatarJim 27th Nov - 9:37pm
    You ironically might quite like this http://theoccasionalpigeonuk.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/liberal-democrats-announce-formation-of.html
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 27th Nov - 9:22pm
    @Amalric 260,000 is the annualised figure. "in the year to June" means "in the 12 months to June". It is 260,000 for the period from...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 27th Nov - 9:04pm
    I do not in the least understand why any Liberal Democrat would do anything but oppose the ridiculous fearmongering about immigration and terrorism which has...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 27th Nov - 9:02pm
    What a timely comment from Stephen Donnelly today. Today is Lancashire Day. Not many people now that. Lancashire Day is held on 27 November. It...
  • User AvatarFrankBooth 27th Nov - 8:55pm
    So if income tax is increased/decreased in rUK what will that mean for Scotland? Will there be Barnett consequentials? Surely you couldn't have income tax...