Nick Clegg on being Nick Clegg in The House magazine

Deputy Prime Minister gave a wide-ranging interview to The House magazine, in which he discusses how it’s right for the two coalition parties to differentiate themselves once a stable government was formed:

In the run-up to the general election, you may remember, the tabloids were screaming, saying that if there was a hung Parliament locusts would descend from the sky and the sun would be blotted out, you know… so we needed for those first few months to show the most important thing of all, which is this is a government that works, and actually works rather well.

Of course, after that phase you then get [that] we’re different parties, we do have different instincts, we do have different values. I just think we are quite relaxed in government that we have our differences – sometimes they are played out in private, sometimes they are played out in public.

Nick goes on to discuss what he sees as significant achievements for the party in government, and, in a telling line, describes the difficulty Lib Dem peers face in supporting legislation they wouldn’t under different circumstances:

Let’s be blunt: I am asking, day in, day out, Liberal Democrat peers to vote on things that they wouldn’t do in a month of Sundays if it was a Liberal Democrat government.

The interview covers such ground as reform of the upper house, Nick’s stance on the Middle East and changes to the tax system.

You can read the whole interview here.

* Prateek Buch is Director of the Social Liberal Forum and serves on the Liberal Democrat Federal Policy Committee

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

One Comment

  • Tony Dawson 3rd Feb '12 - 4:17pm

    ” he discusses how it’s right for the two coalition parties to differentiate themselves once a stable government was formed:”

    Er..no.

    It was right for the two coalition parties to differentiate themselves immediately they formed the coalition. Still, 18 months down the line is better than not at all,if it happens. It would be a delusion to think that the efforts to date have made more than a ‘blip’ with the media and more than little or nothing with the electorate at large.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEd Maxfield 29th Apr - 8:47pm
    Ed Maxfield? I wonder whatever happened to him... I learned many important lessons in that campaign. The biggest one of all was that community by...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 29th Apr - 8:17pm
    Nice to have a few crumbs - but how about going for the big fish ? : The Independent, September, 2013 "Vodafone's £84bn tax avoidance...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 29th Apr - 8:11pm
    Yes - get in there Tom. It's a major scandal that needs sorting.
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 29th Apr - 8:08pm
    With elections imminent BBC TV Question Time had a panel of five, one Tory MP, one Labour MP and one SNP MP, plus two others....
  • User AvatarStuart 29th Apr - 7:53pm
    @Stevan Rose "I’m pretty certain that if all 95,000 arrived tomorrow..." Fact: Of that oft-quoted 95,000 (a figure calculated by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism),...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 29th Apr - 7:53pm
    Carl Gardner 29th Apr '16 - 4:52pm Please look into this more deeply. For instance are people allocated to parties? or do they join of...