Nick Clegg on being Nick Clegg in The House magazine

Deputy Prime Minister gave a wide-ranging interview to The House magazine, in which he discusses how it’s right for the two coalition parties to differentiate themselves once a stable government was formed:

In the run-up to the general election, you may remember, the tabloids were screaming, saying that if there was a hung Parliament locusts would descend from the sky and the sun would be blotted out, you know… so we needed for those first few months to show the most important thing of all, which is this is a government that works, and actually works rather well.

Of course, after that phase you then get [that] we’re different parties, we do have different instincts, we do have different values. I just think we are quite relaxed in government that we have our differences – sometimes they are played out in private, sometimes they are played out in public.

Nick goes on to discuss what he sees as significant achievements for the party in government, and, in a telling line, describes the difficulty Lib Dem peers face in supporting legislation they wouldn’t under different circumstances:

Let’s be blunt: I am asking, day in, day out, Liberal Democrat peers to vote on things that they wouldn’t do in a month of Sundays if it was a Liberal Democrat government.

The interview covers such ground as reform of the upper house, Nick’s stance on the Middle East and changes to the tax system.

You can read the whole interview here.

* Prateek Buch is Director of the Social Liberal Forum and serves on the Liberal Democrat Federal Policy Committee

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

One Comment

  • Tony Dawson 3rd Feb '12 - 4:17pm

    ” he discusses how it’s right for the two coalition parties to differentiate themselves once a stable government was formed:”

    Er..no.

    It was right for the two coalition parties to differentiate themselves immediately they formed the coalition. Still, 18 months down the line is better than not at all,if it happens. It would be a delusion to think that the efforts to date have made more than a ‘blip’ with the media and more than little or nothing with the electorate at large.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid-1 29th Jun - 2:44am
    "There are some Constitutional lawyers saying that MP’s must now vote on whether to accept the outcome of the referendum." Yes, but these are just...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 29th Jun - 1:24am
    @Alex Macfie: I agree, though for somewhat different reasons. I think it would be better for Parliament to stay out of the matter, for two...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 29th Jun - 1:11am
    David I do not get your point as the issues are so different. I am a moderate on the issue of the EU, but would...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 29th Jun - 1:09am
    @Leave EU: Perhaps then you'd like to join the Liberal Democrats in advocating for a fairer, more proportional electoral system, in which those millions of...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 28th Jun - 11:56pm
    “No one in the LEAVE campaign has suggested that EU people already living and working in the Uk would lose any rights to continue to...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 28th Jun - 11:50pm
    So the way forward, after reading all this, seems to be as Graham Watson wrote. The referendum was advisory not legally binding, and with two-thirds...