Here’s Nick Clegg’s latest missive to Lib Dem members and supporters — and no prizes for guessing which topic is the subject this week: Lord Justice Leveson’s report into media standards…
On Thursday afternoon I made a statement in Parliament on the Liberal Democrat response to the Leveson Inquiry. I spoke after the Prime Minister, to outline my view that we must implement Leveson’s plans for an effective new press watchdog, underpinned by legal guarantees.
As you may have picked up, the Prime Minister and I disagreed; there is not yet an agreed “government line”. That’s in part why we had to make separate statements – a major departure from Parliamentary protocol, apparently.
I’m often non-plussed by the arcane rules of the House of Commons, most of which make no sense to ordinary human beings. To me it felt like the most natural thing in the world: two opinions, two statements.
Rather than repeat here what I said in the Commons do watch for yourself here.
Best wishes,
NickPs I’m keen to here your views on this extremely important issue, do get in touch with me here.
Do you know someone who would like to get Nick’s weekly email? Forward this message and they can sign up here:
http://www.libdememails.co.uk/nick
A much shorter letter this week, with greater use made instead of a link to a video of Nick Clegg’s 8-minute speech to the House of Commons on Thursday. And — let’s rejoice! — there is at last a link in the letter enabling anyone, whether party supporter or not, to sign up to receive Nick’s emails.
* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum, and also writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.
Follow @LibDemVoice on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
The Sun story about Chris Huhne that was a total invention (and which the other papers happily copied)
11 Liberal Democrat MPs vote for registrars to be exempt from marrying same sex couples
Simon Hughes MP writes...My vote on the Same Sex Marriage Bill
How Liberal Democrat MPs voted on same sex marriage amendments
Same sex Marriage: another Liberal Democrat victory
An open letter to Tim Farron on unpaid internships
Don Foster writes: A powerful meeting where all faiths spoke with one voice
Simon Hughes MP writes…My vote on the Same Sex Marriage Bill
Report on internet pornography highlights need for education, not restriction
35 student rooms at Radway petrol station - too many ?
Jester Festival 2013 - volunteers needed
Letter from the leader; Coming together and response to the attack in Woolwich
Maghull – Green Lane tree down
The Blood is The Life 25-05-2013
Blogging will be light
Emergency sewer works from Monday: Chequer Street
Nostalgia: The Man from U.N.C.L.E
Just 8.8% vote in CIPR election
Mark Valladares
nuclear cockroach
Alex Smethurst
Robin Bennett
6 Comments
Two opinions, two statements… About time too..
The problem is that too often there have only been two opinions in private. If the chance for coalition comes again an absolute requirement must be a change in how collective responsibility is exercised. There needs to be the agreed right for Ministers to state openly they / their party disagree with a policy but are voting for it or abstaining as a price of coalition. This would allow people to know what the views of those they are asked to vote for are..
Strongly agreed with Steve.
Ideally there should be two “collective responsibilities”, one for each party involved which will allow them to put their own position towards the electorate and preserve their identity. Ministers from both parties would still have to vote for government policies they disagree with, but at least they’d be able to be more honest and transparent over their position on it.
@Steve Way
“The problem is that too often there have only been two opinions in private. If the chance for coalition comes again an absolute requirement must be a change in how collective responsibility is exercised. ”
This appears to be so glaringly obvious that many of us assumed it was the unspoken ‘given’ of the coalition when we voted to accept it.
Hurray – it’s only taken two and a half bloody years! Sadly, it came a day before the worst Lib-Dem by-election results ever. I’m afraid that the Allthatsleft Blog has given the Lib-Dems their coveted Prat of the Week Award this week – I can assure that the voting was as much in sorrow than in anger! Follow the link and feel free to tell us why we’re wrong!
http://www.allthatsleft.co.uk/2012/12/week-48-prat-the-liberal-democrats/
Too often a proposal repugnant to Liberal Democrats has been floated/presented with a suggestion that Nick Clegg has OKd it and after an avalanche of protest he’s taken a stand against it. Of course, it may be that no Liberal Democrat in government ever did nod the thing through, but the traditional way of doing things has obscured this and allowed the Tories to look betrayed and hurt. It may be also we actually have nodded some things through without realising how the Party would take it. So it’s good to see Nick taking a stand right away on this one – and yes, I do think he’s got this right.
Amusing photo there: Young, Lansley and Cameron apparently waiting long to go to the toilet.
And this is the second Nick Clegg missive that hasn’t come to me. Rumours of me leaving the Party have been greatly exaggerated…
Quite frankly I don’t think it would matter if Lib Dem ministers stood up and vocalised their disagreement to 90% of what the government were doing because it will always come down to the fact that it is only because of their compliance that any of it is happening. Worse still it would start to look like straight forward hypocrisy (intellectual disagreement whilst grabbing power for power’s sake).