Nigel Farage’s disappearing fish act

nigel farageLast week I drew attention to the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, which amongst other improvements ends the practice of discards. Chris Davies MEP has been a leading advocate for reform, and had garnered cross-party support.

Even Nigel Farage had said:

First let me stress that the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) has been a complete environmental, economic and social disaster and UKIP uses what say it has in the EU “Parliament” to vote against discards and protect British fishing.

So it is rather intriguing to learn that in the historic vote last week  to end discards and protect British fishing, UKIP MEP’s voted thus:

  • Nigel Farage: did not vote
  • All remaining 9 MEPs: abstained

So what is the difference between not voting and abstaining? It seems that a non-voter is actually present in the building but does not vote, whereas those who abstained were absent.  Any ideas where Nigel Farage was hiding?

You can view the voting record here. You need to scroll down, then select these two filters:  Group – EFD; Member State – United Kingdom.

* Mary Reid is the Tuesday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/33184 for Twitter and emails.

3 Comments

  • Martin Lowe 13th Feb '13 - 8:16am

    It’s almost as if the UKIP political position is merely a stance to get elected whilst the real aim is personal enrichment with as little work as possible!

  • It would be useful to know if Nigel Farage actually abstained, or was just absent. We can’t let any institution butcher the English language to the extent that we don’t know those who abstain (=the deliberate act of being present but not participating) and those who don’t vote (=being absent for any reason). I hope the EU Parliament records those present when a vote is taken and who don’t register one as being abstentions, and those who are absent as non-voters, and not as Mary suggests.

  • The question is whether he really was in the building. We have heard too many tales of politicians registering a presence and then bunking off – I believe it is a trick played in the Lords too. Something to do with claiming expenses.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarManfarang 20th Oct - 3:42am
    Prostitution is legal in England. It is illegal in Thailand.
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 20th Oct - 3:13am
    Dear Paul, I feel strongly that George Osborne is a con man. He's not an economic liberal or a conservative.
  • User AvatarPaul Fox 20th Oct - 12:02am
    The decision is consistent with the LD narrative that Labour crashed the economy and the Coalition was a partnership of principle to rescue the UK...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 19th Oct - 11:59pm
    @Tony Miller "It isn’t a matter of proportional responsibility for action on individual items, but how one partner can persuade the other to do (or...
  • User AvatarEd Shepherd 19th Oct - 11:16pm
    @ Simon Shaw. The article you refer to supports the view that I put forward. Financial support from firms andfor those training to be corporate...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 19th Oct - 10:59pm
    I think Stephen Hesketh is right about the principle of press regulation. Others will disagree, but the press often give the same prominence to inaccurate...