Nigel Farage’s disappearing fish act

nigel farageLast week I drew attention to the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, which amongst other improvements ends the practice of discards. Chris Davies MEP has been a leading advocate for reform, and had garnered cross-party support.

Even Nigel Farage had said:

First let me stress that the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) has been a complete environmental, economic and social disaster and UKIP uses what say it has in the EU “Parliament” to vote against discards and protect British fishing.

So it is rather intriguing to learn that in the historic vote last week  to end discards and protect British fishing, UKIP MEP’s voted thus:

  • Nigel Farage: did not vote
  • All remaining 9 MEPs: abstained

So what is the difference between not voting and abstaining? It seems that a non-voter is actually present in the building but does not vote, whereas those who abstained were absent.  Any ideas where Nigel Farage was hiding?

You can view the voting record here. You need to scroll down, then select these two filters:  Group – EFD; Member State – United Kingdom.

* Mary Reid is the Tuesday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/33184 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Martin Lowe 13th Feb '13 - 8:16am

    It’s almost as if the UKIP political position is merely a stance to get elected whilst the real aim is personal enrichment with as little work as possible!

  • It would be useful to know if Nigel Farage actually abstained, or was just absent. We can’t let any institution butcher the English language to the extent that we don’t know those who abstain (=the deliberate act of being present but not participating) and those who don’t vote (=being absent for any reason). I hope the EU Parliament records those present when a vote is taken and who don’t register one as being abstentions, and those who are absent as non-voters, and not as Mary suggests.

  • The question is whether he really was in the building. We have heard too many tales of politicians registering a presence and then bunking off – I believe it is a trick played in the Lords too. Something to do with claiming expenses.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 31st Oct - 9:16am
    Caractacus: I assume you went to Clacton and saw that the effort was zilch? I would agree that the level of outside help was disappointing,...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 31st Oct - 9:16am
    Well done Toby Matthews for one of the best pieces in LDV for some time. Thought-provoking and attracting some interesting comments in the threads that...
  • User AvatarISHvinder Matharu 31st Oct - 9:15am
    I would prefer our Knight, a man I have a great deal of respect for, to perhaps say "anti Bibi's Government" not anti Israel. It...
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 31st Oct - 8:59am
    The problem is with any 'initiative' taken by the Party at present - it has to be viewed as a device to advantage the electoral...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 31st Oct - 8:34am
    An interesting piece by Andrew which was no doubt written before yesterday's events in Israel, which will not have helped the situation in Paris or...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 31st Oct - 8:01am
    An object lesson in how a minister should respond to serious questions from an opposition member. . "..The member has raised a serious issue, and...