Nine amendments to be debated at Birmingham special conference

Liberal Democrat Voice at Conference

On Lib Dem Voice: Reportage | Live Twitter Stream | Contribute
On the official party website: Conference home
Watch Live on BBC Parliament

Sunday’s special conference in Birmingham will debate nine amendments to the motion about the party’s coalition agreement with the Conservatives (full text of motion here).

The amendments range over why talks with Labour failed, how the party’s policy process will now work, inequality, tuition fees, the Digital Economy Act, the Human Rights Act, lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans equality, PR for local government and PR for the Commons.

You can read them in full in the Conference Extra (pdf file).

UPDATE: All the amendments were passed at conference.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Conference.
Advert

9 Comments

  • Good ones! And especially keep up that pressure for STV. Starting with better articulation of the advantages of multi-member constituencies covering the sub-regional “localities” across which most typically live their lives. Far from any loss of the link between MP and constituency – an updating of it for this age where work, shops and home are not down the same few streets.

  • The mover for motion 4 is Julian Huppert isn’t it? Or is that some sort of trade secret?

    The amendments are all awesome, all need to be said, I hope, shall all pass, and in their contents re-affirm my belief that my fellow members of the Liberal Democrats share my priorities. Woo!

  • Catherine Macintosh 16th May '10 - 7:42am

    I am amazed that there are no amendments relating directly to Trident & the ‘so-called’ independent nuclear deterrent or to nuclear power. These are the major concessions which must be resisted,

  • Ref Philip Young,

    I guess, if you were a Tory in Scotland, or a northern city, or a labour voter in the south, or a Lib Dem in most places – you might forgive multi-member constituencies’ lack of cosyness!

    I would challenge most people to be able to say that they are entering or leaving a particular constituency boundary as they work, rest and play.

  • ref James Blessing!

    probably the most beautiful map ever, ever!

    Quite seriously, although obviously linked to our proposal for PR (by STV) we should in parallel commit to the benefits of multi-member constituencies.

    amendment 9a …………

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 4th Dec - 6:19pm
    I agree with those who support Taiwan , it has a new and terrific female Liberal leader !
  • User AvatarRichard Morris 4th Dec - 6:15pm
    and @davidallen - thank you, and yes, I think that's pretty much exactly what happened.
  • User AvatarRichard Morris 4th Dec - 6:12pm
    @LaurenceCox - oh yes, I absolutely think this will happen. Its deeply troubling whenever I see the 'logic' case made by the UK side negotiators...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 4th Dec - 5:48pm
    Good article, and it's worth pursuing the argument further. As Richard explains, if Joe is told "Offer whatever you choose to offer", and Joe offers...
  • User AvatarJohn Nicholson 4th Dec - 5:43pm
    Having done a telling slot from 7.00-8.00 am at Meadows Hall, Richmond, with the temperature rising from -4 degrees to -2 in that hour (according...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 4th Dec - 5:22pm
    Professor Paton's paper was written in 2014 not as I mistakenly typed 1994, .