Not all is quite so new in the world of political messaging and behaviour change

On my way to windmill spotting in Lincoln recently, I happened across this example of an 19th century election leaflet for the City of Lincoln’s local elections:

It’s a neat example of a point I’ve made before, that what can seem new and exciting in the world of communications often is really long-established ideas in slightly new clothes.

In this case, note two particular features of the message. First, the reference to electors having previously elected Mr Page four times before. In other words, ‘lots of people liked me, so stick with me’ – a mix of what now in the world of behavioural economics gets dressed up with phrases such as uses of social proof (‘look, lots of other people like me so you should too’) and appeals to consistency (‘you voted for me before so you should vote for me again’). Second, Mr Page’s thanks to the electors. That’s what now gets called an appeal to reciprocity – I do something nice for you, you’re more likely to do something nice for me.

Certainly some of the advances in behavioural economics, both in terms of research into how the brain works and in creating theories to marshal and organise such knowledge, are very useful. As Lincoln’s Mr Page also shows, they’re not quite as new as some of their keenest proponents make out.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Campaign Corner.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarHoward 1st Dec - 6:08pm
    The so-called moderate groups are not moderates. The 70,000 malitiamen that Cameron mentions will not leave their own enclaves to fight Da'esh unless Da'esh becomes...
  • User AvatarSue S 1st Dec - 5:43pm
    Cassie. I'm sorry you had to limit your family. My reference to the Little Red Book was( perhaps a feeble ) attempt at a joke...
  • User AvatarDavid Faggiani 1st Dec - 5:40pm
    This feels like a big moment. I'm 30 now, but for people 10-15 years younger than me or so, I think this could be pretty...
  • User AvatarGlenn 1st Dec - 5:33pm
    Jonathan. thank you for the reply. Personally, since the main aim of the 2013 plan was regime change, I suspect ISIL or Al Nusra or...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 1st Dec - 5:17pm
    How? Future atrocities in this country will mainly depend on whether there is a reservoir of disaffected UK citizens-residents prepared to plan and carry out...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 1st Dec - 5:14pm
    As the person who introduce the term 'malthusian' into the debate (meaning to be a broad-strokes term for those inspired by Malthus), let me quote...