Not all is quite so new in the world of political messaging and behaviour change

On my way to windmill spotting in Lincoln recently, I happened across this example of an 19th century election leaflet for the City of Lincoln’s local elections:

It’s a neat example of a point I’ve made before, that what can seem new and exciting in the world of communications often is really long-established ideas in slightly new clothes.

In this case, note two particular features of the message. First, the reference to electors having previously elected Mr Page four times before. In other words, ‘lots of people liked me, so stick with me’ – a mix of what now in the world of behavioural economics gets dressed up with phrases such as uses of social proof (‘look, lots of other people like me so you should too’) and appeals to consistency (‘you voted for me before so you should vote for me again’). Second, Mr Page’s thanks to the electors. That’s what now gets called an appeal to reciprocity – I do something nice for you, you’re more likely to do something nice for me.

Certainly some of the advances in behavioural economics, both in terms of research into how the brain works and in creating theories to marshal and organise such knowledge, are very useful. As Lincoln’s Mr Page also shows, they’re not quite as new as some of their keenest proponents make out.

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Campaign Corner.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRoland 11th Feb - 1:44am
    Stephen Hesketh - "So Roland, you believe that before we had political parties, the wealthy men in Parliament represented their constituents and placed constituent’s interests...
  • User AvatarChris_sh 11th Feb - 1:21am
    @Denis Mollison You may not like the terminology but it is a fairly standard phrase and it's not particularly rude I think. "if a party...
  • User AvatarLorenzo 11th Feb - 12:58am
    P.S. Suart I liked your approach , it is a subject very dear to my heart . Your patience with my level of gusto, previously...
  • User AvatarRoland 11th Feb - 12:47am
    We can’t complain as much over snap referendums like what happened with Crimea if we then have a snap referendum of our own. Strange concept...
  • User AvatarRoland 11th Feb - 12:39am
    John - Is it just me who is offended when those trained at considerable expense to the state threaten to take their newly (and not...
  • User AvatarLorenzo 11th Feb - 12:36am
    Stuart Thank you for your measured response.I agree and disagree .First clarity .Gradewas unacountable when at the BBC , and is again as a Tory...