The weekend debate: Old versus young at work

Here’s your starter for ten in our weekend slot where we throw up an idea or thought for debate…

During the week Foreign Secretary William Hague talked of having a network of diplomats who are past their retirement age of 60 but can be called on to help out at times of international crisis. However Labour MP Frank Roy attacked the idea saying that the Foreign Office instead should be “nurturing young talent”.

What’s your view on this and more generally – should we do more to keep on the skills of people beyond 60, or should people be promptly moved out of the way so as to make way for younger people?

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/23460 for Twitter and emails.

9 Comments

  • They are not mutually exclusive. William Hague never ruled out nuturing younger talent.

  • Simple.

    My view is that a network of retired politicians is a good one, but they should be used to mentor newer politicians and act as ambassadors to schools and universities to get even younger generations to take an interest and engage with politics.

    My view on whether they should be called on in times of international crisis is a bit ambivalent, but I kind of feel that’s what we vote, and pay, our non-retired politicians to do.

  • Nonconformistradical 19th Mar '11 - 10:35am

    I agree they are not mutually exclusive – tthis seems an ideal field for young and old to be working together.

    Just as the young and inexperienced thave a nasty tendency to make lousy drivers, killing inordinate numbers of people on the roads, young and inexperienced ‘diplomats’ risk making lousy decisions without the support and guidance of an older, wiser head.

    There are old pilots and bold pilots – but no old. bold pilots.

  • Disconcerted. 19th Mar '11 - 10:42am

    I know retired ex MI5 who provide consultancy pretty regularly, let alone in crisis.
    The obvious answer is that the Foreign Office should do both, the wisdom of age and the enthusiam of youth should always be combined, what ever the service delivery.

  • I think the mentoring idea is great and I am a great believer that age in iteself should never be a bar to continuing to work.

    The problem with bringing back people that have retured in the diplomatic field is that a lot of their expertise can go fairly quickly as their contacts move on, retire and indeed die. So I’m not sure just how useful they might be in a suddenly emerging international crisis as by the time they were back up to speed it would probably be too late.

    Much better to have a well-trained group of diplomats from a wide age range able to hit the ground running at a moment’s notice who personally know and have dealt with current movers and shakers in a foreign country.

    In the Middle East I think we can see a lot of rulers and civil servants who will be well-known to older, longer-serving diplomats who may have retired in recent years. But whether these diplomats have any connection with the new people coming through is very doubtful I reckon.

  • Stuart Mitchell 20th Mar '11 - 5:38pm

    On the more general point, we currently have record numbers of people working beyond normal retirement age, and record numbers of youth unemployed. The government (as was the last one) is encouraging this by raising the retirement age.

    On the face of it, this is all completely crazy.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Valladares 18th Apr - 6:44pm
    @ malc, Funnily enough, I agree with you. Your support of Thomas Robinson's argument, one almost devoid of accurate fact, demanded challenge, however, as does...
  • User Avatarmalc 18th Apr - 6:19pm
    Mark Valladares Does it really matter if he's Danish or Norwegian? The point is still the same, he comes from a small country with no...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 18th Apr - 6:13pm
    Slightly off-topic, but I would like to suggest that some who write articles for LDV should look at the site before doing so, and instead...
  • User Avatarroger roberts 18th Apr - 6:00pm
    1950
  • User AvatarJenny Barnes 18th Apr - 6:00pm
    If we're discussing electrical power, then the usual measure of output is the kW. Not a notional "home", which could mean anything from the 0.5...
  • User AvatarRadical Liberal 18th Apr - 6:00pm
    ''Similarly, constructive debate of the highest standard requires that participants interpret each other’s arguments charitably; that is choosing the strongest and noblest of the possible...