Only limited success for data-matching trials to improve electoral register

The Electoral Commission reports:

Data matching may have the potential to improve electoral registers in Great Britain, but more work needs to be done, the Electoral Commission has advised the UK Government.

The Commission, the independent elections watchdog, has evaluated pilot schemes by 22 local authorities in England and Scotland, supported by the Cabinet Office. The authorities compared their electoral registers with other sources of information, such as the Department of Work and Pensions database, and the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency driver database as part of the work in preparation for the introduction of individual electoral registration (IER).

The aim was to see if data from these sources was useful for checking the accuracy of the registers and for identifying people missing from the registers who may be eligible to vote.

“The results from the first pilot scheme were inconclusive for a variety of reasons,” says Electoral Commission Director of Electoral Administration, Andrew Scallan. “However, we believe data matching may have the potential to supplement activity by electoral registration officials and help in the implementation of IER. Further, well-constructed trials are necessary so that we can properly evaluate the potential.”

One reason for cautious optimism that further trials will have more success is that the Royal Mail’s change of address database ended up not being tested in the first round of trials. Using the Royal Mail to provide leaflets to people about the need to register when they notify it of changed addresses has had success in the past, so a trial of data matching using these records would have a promising pedigree.

Data Matching Pilot Evaluation

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/27409 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPhilip Wilson 26th Jan - 10:11am
    Also, it is worth considering that while the Green share of the vote may increase, it probably won't result in them gaining additionally seats. It...
  • User AvatarDenis Loretto 26th Jan - 10:08am
    I think all that is required is for it to be made clear that Lord Carlile does not speak for the party on these issues...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 26th Jan - 9:57am
    Ref. 2, Do you mean AV or STV? I hope the latter. There is no way you can have a fair representative system with one-member...
  • User AvatarTsar Nicolas 26th Jan - 9:49am
    Top posts from many - but especially from Paul Walter and Matthew Harris. I suspect that Alex's real crime was defending he-who-can't-be-named.
  • User AvatarMatthew Harris 26th Jan - 9:32am
    The first duty of any politician is to tell the truth as s/he sees it. If Alex Carlile believes that our party line on this...
  • User AvatarMichael Hall 26th Jan - 9:31am
    I agree with Iain Sharpe. I don't think it is appropriate for this site to be used to attack individual members of the Party. Where...