Only limited success for data-matching trials to improve electoral register

The Electoral Commission reports:

Data matching may have the potential to improve electoral registers in Great Britain, but more work needs to be done, the Electoral Commission has advised the UK Government.

The Commission, the independent elections watchdog, has evaluated pilot schemes by 22 local authorities in England and Scotland, supported by the Cabinet Office. The authorities compared their electoral registers with other sources of information, such as the Department of Work and Pensions database, and the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency driver database as part of the work in preparation for the introduction of individual electoral registration (IER).

The aim was to see if data from these sources was useful for checking the accuracy of the registers and for identifying people missing from the registers who may be eligible to vote.

“The results from the first pilot scheme were inconclusive for a variety of reasons,” says Electoral Commission Director of Electoral Administration, Andrew Scallan. “However, we believe data matching may have the potential to supplement activity by electoral registration officials and help in the implementation of IER. Further, well-constructed trials are necessary so that we can properly evaluate the potential.”

One reason for cautious optimism that further trials will have more success is that the Royal Mail’s change of address database ended up not being tested in the first round of trials. Using the Royal Mail to provide leaflets to people about the need to register when they notify it of changed addresses has had success in the past, so a trial of data matching using these records would have a promising pedigree.

Data Matching Pilot Evaluation

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 24th Oct - 1:28am
    A new deadline has been created for Monday evening. I doubt the bill will pass though. What looks like a deadline has been described by...
  • User AvatarTomas H-J 24th Oct - 12:23am
    @Lorenzo Cherin: "Why then .... do we get so much less coverage than UKIP ?!" Because the pivot of British politics in 2015 shifted away...
  • User AvatarPhilip Rolle 23rd Oct - 11:22pm
    An improvement certainly. But Richmond Park will be your test.
  • User AvatarGalen Milne 23rd Oct - 11:13pm
    I'm very sad to hear that Helen has passed away. She was an activist personified and I'm glad to have made her acquaintance via the...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 23rd Oct - 10:29pm
    El Sid "Sorry Paul. Have I been misunderstanding you on this thread? I believed that your good self and the liberal democrat party wanted to...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 23rd Oct - 10:27pm
    The boy Lineker done well...