Only limited success for data-matching trials to improve electoral register

The Electoral Commission reports:

Data matching may have the potential to improve electoral registers in Great Britain, but more work needs to be done, the Electoral Commission has advised the UK Government.

The Commission, the independent elections watchdog, has evaluated pilot schemes by 22 local authorities in England and Scotland, supported by the Cabinet Office. The authorities compared their electoral registers with other sources of information, such as the Department of Work and Pensions database, and the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency driver database as part of the work in preparation for the introduction of individual electoral registration (IER).

The aim was to see if data from these sources was useful for checking the accuracy of the registers and for identifying people missing from the registers who may be eligible to vote.

“The results from the first pilot scheme were inconclusive for a variety of reasons,” says Electoral Commission Director of Electoral Administration, Andrew Scallan. “However, we believe data matching may have the potential to supplement activity by electoral registration officials and help in the implementation of IER. Further, well-constructed trials are necessary so that we can properly evaluate the potential.”

One reason for cautious optimism that further trials will have more success is that the Royal Mail’s change of address database ended up not being tested in the first round of trials. Using the Royal Mail to provide leaflets to people about the need to register when they notify it of changed addresses has had success in the past, so a trial of data matching using these records would have a promising pedigree.

Data Matching Pilot Evaluation

* Mark Pack has written 101 Ways To Win An Election and produces a monthly newsletter about the Liberal Democrats.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Election law.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/27409 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 18th Dec - 11:08am
    Somehow this was ‘alright’? It must have been, because I cannot recall much opposition. No, it was not alright, but for many years to speak...
  • User AvatarNonconformistradical 18th Dec - 11:03am
    Mark is right about the FE not making best use of its time by discussing matters which are the remit of some other federal committee....
  • User AvatarJulia Gibb 18th Dec - 10:52am
    O/T but more important https://twitter.com/ganbowling/status/545333501168742400/photo/1
  • User AvatarAnne 18th Dec - 10:48am
    Who wanted to sell the Royal Mail? Those who would be lining their own and others pockets certainly not the people of the UK. It...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 18th Dec - 10:17am
    Oh, and by the way, it may be true that "Tory EVEL plans are simply about ensuring Labour are less likely to be able to...
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 18th Dec - 10:12am
    g Ah yes, the old "people don't care about democracy, they just care about their standard of living" argument. It's true -- sensible people care...