Opinion: Apostasy and Saudi Arabia

Jeddah Corniche - Some rights reserved by CharlesFredRaif Badawi, a Saudi Arabian liberal writer, was arrested on June 17 in Jeddah and charged with ‘insulting Islam through electronic channels’ and ‘going beyond the realm of obedience’. His ‘crime’ at that point appeared to be setting up an online forum, Free Saudi Liberals, and attending a meeting in Cairo on May 7 of the Arab Alliance for Freedom and Democracy, but the words that constitute the offence were not specified.

Since then the ingredients of the ‘crime’ have been identified:

    • He wrote about Valentine’s Day – a celebration banned in Saudi Arabia.
    • He wrote at the end of the article: “Congratulations to us for the Commission on the Promotion of Virtue for teaching us virtue and for its eagerness to ensure that all members of the Saudi public are among the people of paradise”. (The Commission on the Promotion of Virtue is the de facto religious police in Saudi Arabia).
    • He failed to remove certain articles by other people on his website – such as one insinuating that the al-Imam Mohamed ibn Saud University had become “a den for terrorists”.

In fact, the forum provided a platform for an open and peaceful discussion about religion and religious figures, according to Human Rights Watch. It was a requirement that contributors should adopt a respectful attitude to all religions, but that obviously did not mean they had to avoid criticising persons, institutions and practices.

After five sessions of the trial in the District Court at Jeddah that were said by Amnesty International to be ‘rife with irregularities’, a new judge took over, who called on Badawi to repent. He declined to do so, as anybody accused of conduct which is permissible under internationally accepted norms on freedom of expression. The judge then, without allowing Badawi’s lawyer to speak, transferred the case to the higher level ‘General Court’ dealing with more serious offences

Badawi duly appeared in the General Court on December 22, where the charge was upgraded to apostasy, which carries the death penalty under Shari’a law. However, the Qur’an defines apostasy as the rejection of faith in God after believing in him, which doesn’t apply to Badawi’s alleged conduct. Moreover, in none of the thirteen verses of the Qur’an which mention apostasy is the death sentence prescribed for it. Punishment for the offence is indeed mentioned, but it is always in the hereafter.

But even that is to accept that the argument should be conducted on Wahabi terms. Freedom of religion under Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights includes freedom to change one’s religion, and to exercise those freedoms without coercion. The Prophet himself said: “There shall be no compulsion in religion.”

It is time for Liberals to stand up for Badawi, and to condemn the wicked laws that punish apostasy and blasphemy as well. Yes, we must respect religion, but not the judicial and punitive norms that are sanctioned under the guise of religion, which violate the most fundamental of human rights.

* Eric Lubbock, Lord Avebury, is a working peer, and Vice-Chair, Parliamentary Human Rights Group. He blogs here.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32431 for Twitter and emails.

6 Comments

  • It might be a good start for the government to stop selling such regimes weapons. Weapons that have the potential to be used against their own people in future.

  • Saudi Arabia is the West’s North Korea, and almost everything it does undermines the international peace and stability of Muslims vis-à-vis each other and non-muslims. We have to stop buying its oil – only then can we make a serious effort to push it to reform.

  • “Going beyond the realm of obedience,” was one of the two charges against Raif Badawi on June 17th. Were he to be tried for this then the court itself would be going beyond the realm of obedience. This is because the Koran states that all such cases are judged by God in the afterlife. When a Saudi judge give himself the authority of God he certainty is not serving God but someone else.

  • Richard Dean 2nd Jan '13 - 6:45am

    Islam does seem to get itself into a mess, doesn’t it! What principles can guide us in addressing these problems without attacking Islam itself? Is there more to understand here than what is being presented to us? Not only in the charges and the court proceedings but in the society itself? There’s no apostasy in the original alleged offences, so I wonder if it’s in his refusal to repent – which perhaps we might better translate as contempt of court?

  • I have many Pakistani friends that also telll me about how Pakistan used to be moderate muslim country until Saudi Arabia started to export it’s Sunni Wahhabism to it. Now Pakistan is full of terrorists.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 24th Oct - 4:18pm
    JohnTilley So it would appear that in 2014 in Scotland the poor, alienated and dispossessed have found a place to go, and that includes going...
  • User AvatarT-J 24th Oct - 4:13pm
    JohnTilley, I'm a Liberal Democrat in Scotland who hasn't turned into a Unionist and I am not encouraged in the least by the way that...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 24th Oct - 4:03pm
    Matthew Green Just look at how this country as evolved since 1974, the year when I came to political consciousness as a teenager. In 1974...
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 24th Oct - 3:49pm
    To abolish all WAR. Not "all was"!
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 24th Oct - 3:48pm
    Political vanity is hardly fair. While only one member of the cabinet saw action (Churchill), most had sons in the trenches. Lloyd George had two...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 24th Oct - 3:28pm
    Matthew, Apologies that last comment got whisked off before I had if finished. It should have ended But I think you are just factually incorrect...