There is a big misconception held by the anti-BNP Liberal/Left and that is that BNP members are all rabid racists who hate anyone who is not white. The real thrust of the BNP is that English people should have a place called England where they can maintain and develop their own culture, identity and community, just as other peoples are entitled to their own lands. (Likewise for the Scots, Welsh etc.)

You will doubtless be aware of the structural links between many of the establishment Unions and the Labour Party. Solidarity has no such links with any Party and does not operate a political fund currently.

Please feel free to answer the substantive points I have made in my original post or to discuss my personal political history further if you feel that is more important.

Having got to know a little about the people on the list I don’t believe the ‘racist’ tag fits. There is no evidence to suggest any improper behaviour in their professional role.

The Police and Prison Service bans have, in my opinion, been adopted not to make any real difference in service to the public but rather as a PR point to state that the institutions are not racist. Logically, of course kicking out six BNP members proves nothing of the sort. Let’s have a real debate about this. It’s important.

Splitter!

I suppose for the box tickers I am a libertarian Anarcho-Syndicalist who votes LibDem….

Chill Winston

A proud member of the Aryan race has trouble with an Aryan language!

It is “so illiberal AS”, not “so illiberal THAN”.

“Human Rights are for everyone, not to just those who agree with us.”

But just a second. The founder of the BNP, the late John Tyndall, once wrote that his idea of freedom was “not the modern Jew-inspired idea of freedom”, but freedom only for “those who deserve it”.

“It’s what makes us not fascists.”

Yes, we do have to be careful with our terminology, don’t we?

“Fascists” are followers of Benito Mussolini, who belonged to a race Nazis consider inferior. John Tyndall castigated Martin Webster for hob-nobbing with “Mediterraneans”, something he believed no true Aryan should dream of doing.

Trawling through the BNP membership list I see a guy who once called an Asian man an “inferior being” in a city centre street, and once tried to persuade the Dowager Lady Birdwood to authorise attacks on synagogues.

Lovely people, the British Nazi Party.

The old ones are the best….

There is nothing so illiberal than a liberal.

Human Rights are for everyone, not to just those who agree with us.

Whilst the BNP are a legal political organisation, and do not break the law; they and their members are entitled to be treated exactly like anyone else from the 32 CSM to Fatah al-Islam to even the Liberal Democrats.

Just because Neu Arbiet (c.DDR) has decided what political parties police and prison officers can belong to doesn’t make it right

It’s what makes us not fascists.

I do agree with the ban on BNP membership in the police, however. One of the police’s key roles is in race relations, and this is simply not compatible with the BNP’s aims. Teachers, too, should not be permitted to be members for the same reasons (although university lecturers could be a different case because of their audience.) Doctors who refuse to treat a patient would be in breach of their oath so there’s probably no reason for a specific ban here.

I guess the question is though – where do you stop? Do you ban business studies or economics teachers from being members of the Communist party because it’s not compatible with the state’s view of economics? Should teachers who do not subscribe to the notion of global warming be allowed to teach science in schools? Can members of the military join organisations like CND? The list could go on…

http://markreckons.blogspot.com/2008/11/prostitution-lets-have-heated-debate.html

Are you opposed to media outlets analysing the data contained in the membership list? As both the BBC and the Grauniad have done?

Note that I have not disclosed who is and isn’t on the list, as much as I would like to, out of respect for the moderator’s instructions not to link to it or quote from it.

““who can resist a peek?” Me. If we don’t think that the list should be public, surely we should not look at it even when it becomes public?”

I was opposed to the building of the M25. Does that mean I don’t drive on it?

Bear in mind the following: (1) confidentiality ceases to exist once it has been destroyed, and (2) there is a public interest defence to breach of confidentiality.

So I am quite happy, indeed, delighted, to comb through all 12,000 names.

Specifically the rights to control their homelands, and to not be race-replaced through immigration and govt. programs of deracination.