Opinion: Can Labour be trusted on mental health?

In my last two articles for Liberal Democrat Voice I wrote about the current under provision in mental health treatment in the country and why it is important that properly addressing mental health is brought into the political mainstream.

Thankfully in recent weeks this has started to happen. Of course there was Ed Miliband’s speech to the Royal College of Psychiatrists in which he spoke of the need for improved provision in mental health treatments across the country. Many people will of course welcome this state of affairs and it is encouraging if Miliband is intending to put improved mental health provision at the forefront of Labour’s health policy.

Unfortunately there is reason to be sceptical regarding Labour’s new position. As Norman Lamb pointed out in a recent article for this website, the last Labour Government

consistently treated mental health as a second class service: introducing an 18 week waiting time target for physical health but not for mental health and specifically excluding mental health users from the right to choose where, and by whom, you are treated. The absurd but inevitable result was a health service in which the bias towards physical health has been institutionalised, despite all the evidence demonstrating the fundamental importance of mental health.

Indeed. Can we really have any confidence, given, the Labour’ Party’s recent record of hypocrisy, that a Miliband led Government would make good on the statements made in his recent speech?

Thankfully Lib Dems, and those like me who suffer from anxiety and depression, can rest assured that our party has consistently made improved mental health provision a cornerstone of health policy in recent months and years.

Many have previously commended the excellent work which the previous Lib Dem Health Minister, Paul Burstow did regarding mental health treatment, and now this has been sealed by the publication of the first mandate between the Government and the NHS Commissioning Board.

It is a great relief to me that placing mental health care on a par with physical health care is now written in to the mandate, alongside ensuring better access to psychological therapies.

Since first going to my doctor at the end of July and asking for a referral to a talking therapies service I have not yet had my first session and will not start it until December 12th. This has already felt like too long, and I am someone who is not at the more serious end of those who suffer. I am sure there are many people who read this website, are in a far worse state than I am and who feel let down by the lack of treatment they receive on the NHS.

I hope that it is some consolation for those people that there are many in this party – including those who spoke at and moved the excellent motion at conference – who will continue to ensure that mental health treatment is not pushed to the sidelines, as it has consistently been by previous Tory and Labour Governments.

* Tim Purkiss is a party member from Somerset and blogs at Nation Discussion

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31651 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Great series of articles, Tim

  • Thanks both.

    Lee you are quite correct in your comments about the media coverage of conference. We never recieve a good press in comparison to the other two parties.

    My own experience makes me inclined to agree with your comment that “anti-depressents are still often given out like smarties.”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 18th Dec - 4:13pm
    I think "spare room subsidy" was only ever a propaganda term (just like "bedroom tax", of course!) -- given there never was a "spare room...
  • User Avatarmatt (Bristol) 18th Dec - 3:37pm
    Can I make a small additional point about EVEL which I don't think I have seen elsewhere? What would happen to House of Lords reform...
  • User AvatarJames Harper 18th Dec - 3:35pm
    Julian I think I agree with you almost entirely. I'm really just trying to be a bit provocative. I guess I don't think that, strictly...
  • User AvatarRob Gershon 18th Dec - 3:30pm
    I'm really disappointed in this take on it. Bedroom Tax has become a punchy headline issue because, as the DWP Interim report from earlier this...
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 18th Dec - 3:20pm
    One of the best articles I've read about this was while I was in Canada a month ago - http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/soccer/kelly-fifas-comical-attempted-whitewash-still-indicts-russia-and-qatar/article21571684/
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 18th Dec - 2:58pm
    I disagree completely with the idea that scenario 3 is the worst outcome. Far from it, I think it's the best we can hope for....