Opinion: Can Labour be trusted on mental health?

In my last two articles for Liberal Democrat Voice I wrote about the current under provision in mental health treatment in the country and why it is important that properly addressing mental health is brought into the political mainstream.

Thankfully in recent weeks this has started to happen. Of course there was Ed Miliband’s speech to the Royal College of Psychiatrists in which he spoke of the need for improved provision in mental health treatments across the country. Many people will of course welcome this state of affairs and it is encouraging if Miliband is intending to put improved mental health provision at the forefront of Labour’s health policy.

Unfortunately there is reason to be sceptical regarding Labour’s new position. As Norman Lamb pointed out in a recent article for this website, the last Labour Government

consistently treated mental health as a second class service: introducing an 18 week waiting time target for physical health but not for mental health and specifically excluding mental health users from the right to choose where, and by whom, you are treated. The absurd but inevitable result was a health service in which the bias towards physical health has been institutionalised, despite all the evidence demonstrating the fundamental importance of mental health.

Indeed. Can we really have any confidence, given, the Labour’ Party’s recent record of hypocrisy, that a Miliband led Government would make good on the statements made in his recent speech?

Thankfully Lib Dems, and those like me who suffer from anxiety and depression, can rest assured that our party has consistently made improved mental health provision a cornerstone of health policy in recent months and years.

Many have previously commended the excellent work which the previous Lib Dem Health Minister, Paul Burstow did regarding mental health treatment, and now this has been sealed by the publication of the first mandate between the Government and the NHS Commissioning Board.

It is a great relief to me that placing mental health care on a par with physical health care is now written in to the mandate, alongside ensuring better access to psychological therapies.

Since first going to my doctor at the end of July and asking for a referral to a talking therapies service I have not yet had my first session and will not start it until December 12th. This has already felt like too long, and I am someone who is not at the more serious end of those who suffer. I am sure there are many people who read this website, are in a far worse state than I am and who feel let down by the lack of treatment they receive on the NHS.

I hope that it is some consolation for those people that there are many in this party – including those who spoke at and moved the excellent motion at conference – who will continue to ensure that mental health treatment is not pushed to the sidelines, as it has consistently been by previous Tory and Labour Governments.

* Tim Purkiss is a party member from Somerset and blogs at Nation Discussion

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Great series of articles, Tim

  • Thanks both.

    Lee you are quite correct in your comments about the media coverage of conference. We never recieve a good press in comparison to the other two parties.

    My own experience makes me inclined to agree with your comment that “anti-depressents are still often given out like smarties.”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarpetermartin2001 12th Feb - 1:10am
    @RC "As a disproof of your theory, it is entirely possible to have a public sector deficit and a balance of payments surplus. This is...
  • User Avatarmalc 12th Feb - 12:11am
    Meral Hussein Ece Only 450 women may have been elected to to the House of Commons since 1918, but the fact that we currently have...
  • User AvatarPeter Hayes 12th Feb - 12:03am
    The needle in the haystack has the alternative view, if there is only one needle why make the haystack larger?
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 11th Feb - 11:42pm
    The statements by London's chief planning officer are interesting, but is he speaking for Boris? or can he actually deliver what he is saying?
  • User AvatarMeral Hussein Ece 11th Feb - 11:26pm
    Sal Brintons is to be commended for setting out very coherently why we need to support this motion, which will send out a clear message...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 11th Feb - 11:18pm
    @David Raw '“Why did we say nothing about the Tories’ European bedfellows in the European election campaign in 2014?!?!?!?!” Because we were in coalition with...
Thu 11th Feb 2016
Sat 13th Feb 2016
Tue 16th Feb 2016
Thu 18th Feb 2016
Fri 19th Feb 2016
Sat 20th Feb 2016
Thu 25th Feb 2016
Fri 26th Feb 2016
Sat 27th Feb 2016
Sun 28th Feb 2016
Mon 29th Feb 2016
Thu 3rd Mar 2016
Sat 5th Mar 2016