Opinion: more freedom, more responsibility, more accountability for Wales

The launch of the Silk Commission’s first report this week is a real win for liberalism.

The report looks at the financial powers that the National Assembly for Wales should have, how accountable it is for its spending and how we ensure effective economic policy is rewarded. I welcome the report’s declaration that a number of taxes, such as air passenger duty and landfill tax, should be devolved. But more significantly, the report also recommends that by 2020, the Welsh and UK governments should share responsibility for income tax paid in Wales – and that the Welsh government should have the power to set the rate of its share. The Welsh Liberal Democrats have been calling for these changes since the National Assembly was established.

The completion of this report is a major Welsh Liberal Democrat victory. Kirsty Williams fought for this as part of the coalition deal and banged heads together when it looked like consensual terms of reference may not be developed. Labour and the Conservatives, who have a substantial number of devosceptics in their party ranks, did not drive this review forwards.

If the recommendations are introduced, for the very first time, a Welsh government will have a financial interest in making sure its job-creation strategies are actually effective. Liberalism means making sure that governments are accountable, not only at election times, but constantly. Accountability for performance is guaranteed if governments are financially rewarded for good government. The proposals to improve this accountability are drawn from the liberal tradition.

But devolution of income tax could well harm Wales if it is brought in without substantial reform of the Barnett formula, which allocates money between the UK nations and regions. A study by Gerry Holtham, a leading economist, showed that under the current formula, Wales receives less money than it would if it were an equally deprived region of England. I am clear that income tax cannot be devolved unless action is taken on this measure. Otherwise, we will not have the money available to other regions with whom we will have to compete. Wales will be taking a much bigger risk, but from a much lower base, than elsewhere and that is simply unfair.

The Labour Party are content with the current arrangement. The Welsh government is given money and if they are not able to achieve what they want, then they ask for a little bit more. This is begging-bowl politics and it is does not befit a mature nation. But it explains why they have not driven forward this agenda. Carwyn Jones, the First Minister, has made it clear that the government will not support income tax powers without reforming Barnett, and unless there is a referendum. So, we need to make the political progress necessary to reform the unfairness of the Barnett formula. Politically, we cannot proceed with this project without the Labour Party. A referendum on income tax powers would need the support of an Assembly and the Labour Party would hold an effective veto while they still hold thirty seats. So while it is hugely important to reform the Barnett formula because it is unfair, politically it is essential too.

I am clear that the Silk report is a victory for liberalism in Wales. We demanded the report’s production as part of the coalition agreement and it has produced a liberal agenda. But the test will be when we begin to implement that agenda. When a new Wales Bill receives Royal Assent and these powers are devolved – that is when we will have achieved a real liberal gain.

* Peter Black is the Liberal Democrat AM for South Wales West and is the Liberal Democrat spokesperson on Local Government, Heritage, Housing and Finance.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News and Wales.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31736 for Twitter and emails.

One Comment

  • You are going to have to work REALLY hard to sell the idea of the Assembly setting taxes.
    Because the instant reaction from everyone I know to the idea has been: “Great, MORE taxes.”
    Because we all imagine it will mean those of in work paying higher taxes than we do now.

    The follow-up question being: what if you live in Wales but work in Bristol? Or vice versa?
    Or even sillier: if you live in Sedbury and work in Chepstow/vice versa?

    We are a low-wage nation with a lot of unemployment and deprivation, so of course we rattle the begging bowl.
    Those of us in work can’t fund those who aren’t without money from England or the EU.
    And if independence means the WAG being more answerable for how it runs things, and therefore likely to do things better – how come our ambulance service is such a mess?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 3rd Sep - 12:31am
    John Dunn, Ukraine has a great deal to lose as a consequence of deteriorating relations with Russia and has sought to maintain its export trade...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 3rd Sep - 12:04am
    Liberals should continue arguing unfashionable causes, whilst not necessarily putting them in the manifesto. When it comes to Sterlingisation and the EU: I think Scotland...
  • User AvatarFrankBooth 2nd Sep - 11:55pm
    Tim13 - you suggested it was the cue for rump UK and Scotland to join the Euro. You'd have to deal with the implacably opposed...
  • User AvatarT-J 2nd Sep - 11:41pm
    OK, it's all very well and good to guarantee more powers, but I just don't have enough confidence in most of the people issuing that...
  • User AvatarDavid G 2nd Sep - 11:37pm
    +1 to what Martin said. The argument that current EU law or opinion doesn't allow something is pretty pathetic - the law will just have...
  • User AvatarTim13 2nd Sep - 11:34pm
    Frank Booth I do consider it useful, if not essential, to continue arguing unfashionable cases, such as the Euro in Britain. Otherwise people will just...