Opinion: Shared Parental Leave? Why Bother?

Nick Clegg’s announcement today may be overshadowed by various rows in the media, but this is an historic moment. Parents will soon be able to share 50 weeks of the 52 weeks maternity leave entitlement, and everyone will have the right to request flexible working.

Why does this matter?

Because we are wasting the talent of our women workers to such an extent that when women start a family they often take a drop in their pay, lose the opportunity for promotion or even can find themselves locked out of the labour market. About one million women are missing from the UK market  compared to best performing economies.

This is not only wasteful of half our workforce, but it is costing us. As Nick says in his speech today

In the words of the World Bank, gender equality is smart economics. It isn’t just the key to a fairer society, it’s the key to prosperity too.

Together with the right to request flexible working for everyone, parent or not, and the raising of the personal tax threshold (a policy introduced to conference by  Women Liberal Democrats by the way) we are seeing radical reforms that will allow fathers more time with their children, and mothers a chance to redress the gender pay gap which affects almost all mothers in their mid careers.

* Women Liberal Democrats aim to eliminate all discrimination based on gender. Dr Miranda Whitehead is current Chair.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/31498 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

  • The shared parental leave is an excelent idea (I hope htey have resolved any operational issues, I haven’t checked) that will hopefully change society to be more equal.

    I’m unconvinced that the “right to request” stuff will see much effect at all.

  • Stephen Donnelly 13th Nov '12 - 8:39pm

    @Psi The right to for everyone to request flexible working mirrors the rights that some staff (i.e. Parents with children under 17) already enjoy. It is quite an effective and subtle piece of legislation because the employer has to show that it has considered the request reasonably. We have never turned one down, though we have negotiated times and days.

    Shared parental leave is a vital change. Whatever the law currently says, young women (and not so young these days) are often discriminated against because they may take maternity leave. If either partner can take leave, that major source of discrimination will be eliminated. To prevent this placing an unfair burden on small and medium sized businesses employers must be given sufficient notice so that they can plan for the absence.

  • Stephen Donnelly – I think this is a great idea and I wish it had been around when I had my children.

    However … I fear take up by men will be minimal. Maternity leave is now sufficiently normal, and management aware of the pitfalls of discrimination, that taking it is expected and career progression more self than externally limited.

    A man taking extended paternity leave will be for ever classed as second rate by the alpha males who run things. Men know this, and will see any interest in it as career suicide.

  • Dinti Batstone 14th Nov '12 - 1:11pm

    This is a huge step forward and one I’m really proud that Liberal Democrats in government have been able to deliver. Tabman is right to highlight that the challenge now is to ensure men take up their new rights, but I’m rather more optimistic than he is about the prospect of that happening.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarColin 26th Apr - 4:34pm
    That vote is for dissolving parliament, but it could happen if the government had the confidence of the house or not. It's not specifically about...
  • User AvatarJohnTilley 26th Apr - 4:33pm
    As The IOS reports - "... £37 billion has been invested in renewable energy, supporting 460,000 jobs as of 2013, " This is at least...
  • User AvatarDenis Mollison 26th Apr - 4:32pm
    PS Thanks to John and Stephen for their support. William - "is there any counter-view within the higher reaches of our party that STV is...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 26th Apr - 4:32pm
    "Any government that relied on the support of the DUP/UKIP/SNP would be a threat to the continued existence of the UK. " I'm looking for...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 26th Apr - 4:30pm
    Colin: "There is only one way that a government would fall and that is by losing a specifically worded bill of no confidence. " Surely...
  • User AvatarIain 26th Apr - 4:28pm
    Stuart - I think the point there is that the popularity of the position would have been massively undermined, and the party could have badly...