<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinion: Why did the SNP outperform the Lib Dems?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html</link>
	<description>Our place to talk - an independent website for supporters of the Liberal Democrat party in the UK.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:36:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Erlend Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-16853</link>
		<dc:creator>Erlend Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-16853</guid>
		<description>The Scottish Lib Dems made a big point before the election of saying we would not join a government to push a referendum through. Personally as a Scottish Member I was less than totally convinced by this.

But having pledged that for the previous 6 months, can you imagine what Tories and New Labour would have said if the day after the election we had gone back on that. 

In my opinion the former was a wrong tactic but the latter was a principled stand.

Erlend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Scottish Lib Dems made a big point before the election of saying we would not join a government to push a referendum through. Personally as a Scottish Member I was less than totally convinced by this.</p>
<p>But having pledged that for the previous 6 months, can you imagine what Tories and New Labour would have said if the day after the election we had gone back on that. </p>
<p>In my opinion the former was a wrong tactic but the latter was a principled stand.</p>
<p>Erlend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Wake</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14391</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Wake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14391</guid>
		<description>My feeling is that now he has been elected Alex Salmond will be there for quite a while if he is reasonably competent and lucky. His election has broken the SNP&#039;s credibility barrier and they will be largely unaffected by the backlashes against the UK Government that often destroy local administrations.
His problems will arise if he gets the extra powers for the Scottish Parliament also sought by the Liberal Democrats as then he will be held accountable for the way he exercises them whereas a Parliament with limited powers can always blame the UK Government if things go wrong.

This is quite a way off and in the mean time it does seem odd that a party that presumably aspires to rule the UK should refuse to join a Scottish Government with which it has many policies in common although it might be wise to get out, if it is not forced out by the results of the next election, when the extra powers start to be implemented.

The attitude of Scottish Liberal Democrats does seem a bit immature by refusing to take responsibility, although we do not know what the SNP offered or required in return for their support. Unfortunately the public will see it as sour grapes and give all the credit to the SNP for any successes. They might become like the Parti Quebequois, running the country for ever and occasionally calling a referendum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feeling is that now he has been elected Alex Salmond will be there for quite a while if he is reasonably competent and lucky. His election has broken the SNP&#8217;s credibility barrier and they will be largely unaffected by the backlashes against the UK Government that often destroy local administrations.<br />
His problems will arise if he gets the extra powers for the Scottish Parliament also sought by the Liberal Democrats as then he will be held accountable for the way he exercises them whereas a Parliament with limited powers can always blame the UK Government if things go wrong.</p>
<p>This is quite a way off and in the mean time it does seem odd that a party that presumably aspires to rule the UK should refuse to join a Scottish Government with which it has many policies in common although it might be wise to get out, if it is not forced out by the results of the next election, when the extra powers start to be implemented.</p>
<p>The attitude of Scottish Liberal Democrats does seem a bit immature by refusing to take responsibility, although we do not know what the SNP offered or required in return for their support. Unfortunately the public will see it as sour grapes and give all the credit to the SNP for any successes. They might become like the Parti Quebequois, running the country for ever and occasionally calling a referendum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridget Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14276</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 12:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14276</guid>
		<description>We do not need to be part of a formal coalition in Scotland to get Lib Dem policies implemented. Salmond has said he will seek support on an issue by issue basis. This gives our MSPs a clear opportunity to vote through some of their manifesto policies without being constrained to support SNP initiatives with which they disagree. This is a good place to be!

Salmond is also fortunate in that he can blame the lack of a referendum on the other parties, while knowing that most Scots aren&#039;t that keen on one anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do not need to be part of a formal coalition in Scotland to get Lib Dem policies implemented. Salmond has said he will seek support on an issue by issue basis. This gives our MSPs a clear opportunity to vote through some of their manifesto policies without being constrained to support SNP initiatives with which they disagree. This is a good place to be!</p>
<p>Salmond is also fortunate in that he can blame the lack of a referendum on the other parties, while knowing that most Scots aren&#8217;t that keen on one anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Wake</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14261</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Wake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 11:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14261</guid>
		<description>For a party that has been in opposition for 85 years apart from the National Government and the Wartime Coalition, another period in opposition seems like madness. The Liberal Democrats should be taking every opportunity to be in Government wherever they can find common ground and do not betray their principles.
Apart from the obviously considerable differences over independence there would seem to be plenty of common ground with the SNP over things like more powers for the Scottish Parliament, abolishing the council tax etc. Alex Salmond does seem to be a charismatic leader like Tony Blair was in the early days and it will be easier to break away from Salmond if he turns out to be a disaster than it was to disengage from Blair because Salmond does not have a huge majority as Blair did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a party that has been in opposition for 85 years apart from the National Government and the Wartime Coalition, another period in opposition seems like madness. The Liberal Democrats should be taking every opportunity to be in Government wherever they can find common ground and do not betray their principles.<br />
Apart from the obviously considerable differences over independence there would seem to be plenty of common ground with the SNP over things like more powers for the Scottish Parliament, abolishing the council tax etc. Alex Salmond does seem to be a charismatic leader like Tony Blair was in the early days and it will be easier to break away from Salmond if he turns out to be a disaster than it was to disengage from Blair because Salmond does not have a huge majority as Blair did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Wake</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14170</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Wake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 11:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14170</guid>
		<description>If anyone tries to seek their fortune through the Lib Dems they are sadly misguided ? - not so sure about that.

Why was it right to form a coalition with Labour to provide Scotland with a workable administration but when the arithmetic made that no longer possible after the SNP beat Labour in the election, the party could not make a deal with the SNP or is this standoff just a bargaining manoeuvre ?

I hope this is not an attempt to give Labour another chance in return for some vague and breakable promise of PR by Gordon Brown to Ming Campbell - seems all too likely after his comments on that party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone tries to seek their fortune through the Lib Dems they are sadly misguided ? &#8211; not so sure about that.</p>
<p>Why was it right to form a coalition with Labour to provide Scotland with a workable administration but when the arithmetic made that no longer possible after the SNP beat Labour in the election, the party could not make a deal with the SNP or is this standoff just a bargaining manoeuvre ?</p>
<p>I hope this is not an attempt to give Labour another chance in return for some vague and breakable promise of PR by Gordon Brown to Ming Campbell &#8211; seems all too likely after his comments on that party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hywel Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14160</link>
		<dc:creator>Hywel Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14160</guid>
		<description>If anyone tries to seek their fortune through the Liberal Democrats they are sadly misguided!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone tries to seek their fortune through the Liberal Democrats they are sadly misguided!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14100</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14100</guid>
		<description>OK I sometimes put my foot in it. The other Geoff Payne is someone I admire, there is nothing wrong in being pro-establishment, or in seeking fame or fortune.
Although I am not pro-establishment, the only reason I do not seek fame or fortune is that I lack the courage to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I sometimes put my foot in it. The other Geoff Payne is someone I admire, there is nothing wrong in being pro-establishment, or in seeking fame or fortune.<br />
Although I am not pro-establishment, the only reason I do not seek fame or fortune is that I lack the courage to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eastender</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14091</link>
		<dc:creator>Eastender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14091</guid>
		<description>That was meant to be a man with his tongue stuck out, but once again I have been foiled by a computer that is smarter than I am...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was meant to be a man with his tongue stuck out, but once again I have been foiled by a computer that is smarter than I am&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eastender</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14090</link>
		<dc:creator>Eastender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14090</guid>
		<description>I read this and thought it must be &quot;our&quot; Geoff Payne and not Newham&#039;s. The single sentence paragraphs gave it away. This would be the respected anti nuclear, pro environment, ex early 80&#039;s Young Liberals activist, Geoff Payne. I don&#039;t believe this Geoff Payne has any less right to use his name than the other one - indeed how do we know he doesn&#039;t object to the other Geoff Payne going round using his name? :oP

You are right that the SNP are increasingly similar to us - the reason being that they can see that our policies hold a great deal of appeal to voters North of the Border. As with Cameron&#039;s tories, the devil is in the detail - as Rob Blackie rightly points out, when push comes to shove, they&#039;ll show their nasty side.

Tristan, reducing government power isn&#039;t an aim in itself - it can be a dangerous thing. Whilst I don&#039;t wish to try to teach you to suck eggs, surely freeing people to live their lives without undue interference in general is the ideal? I thought that experience had taught us that sometimes that means that the government must take some control to safeguard those rights? Whilst I don&#039;t approve of the willingness to control and nanny the populace espoused by the &quot;socialist&quot; left, there are two sides to every freedom and two sides to be protected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this and thought it must be &#8220;our&#8221; Geoff Payne and not Newham&#8217;s. The single sentence paragraphs gave it away. This would be the respected anti nuclear, pro environment, ex early 80&#8242;s Young Liberals activist, Geoff Payne. I don&#8217;t believe this Geoff Payne has any less right to use his name than the other one &#8211; indeed how do we know he doesn&#8217;t object to the other Geoff Payne going round using his name? <img src='http://www.libdemvoice.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> P</p>
<p>You are right that the SNP are increasingly similar to us &#8211; the reason being that they can see that our policies hold a great deal of appeal to voters North of the Border. As with Cameron&#8217;s tories, the devil is in the detail &#8211; as Rob Blackie rightly points out, when push comes to shove, they&#8217;ll show their nasty side.</p>
<p>Tristan, reducing government power isn&#8217;t an aim in itself &#8211; it can be a dangerous thing. Whilst I don&#8217;t wish to try to teach you to suck eggs, surely freeing people to live their lives without undue interference in general is the ideal? I thought that experience had taught us that sometimes that means that the government must take some control to safeguard those rights? Whilst I don&#8217;t approve of the willingness to control and nanny the populace espoused by the &#8220;socialist&#8221; left, there are two sides to every freedom and two sides to be protected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14014</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 06:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14014</guid>
		<description>&quot;remember that at the last conference there was talk of the Lib Dems finishing in second.&quot;

I remember - I didn&#039;t believe it then either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;remember that at the last conference there was talk of the Lib Dems finishing in second.&#8221;</p>
<p>I remember &#8211; I didn&#8217;t believe it then either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14002</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 00:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-14002</guid>
		<description>Geoff; since when was reducing state power a right wing agenda?  I think you&#039;re confusing liberalism with redistribution, I&#039;m (very) left-wing compared to most of the party, but I also agree with Tristan, who (assuming it&#039;s Tristan Mills) I know to be as on the right of the party as I am on the left.

We need to be properly liberal, and understand that our message must be to give people the opportunities to help themselves.  That&#039;s a left wing position if ever I heard one, it&#039;s certainly opposed to the established governance tendencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff; since when was reducing state power a right wing agenda?  I think you&#8217;re confusing liberalism with redistribution, I&#8217;m (very) left-wing compared to most of the party, but I also agree with Tristan, who (assuming it&#8217;s Tristan Mills) I know to be as on the right of the party as I am on the left.</p>
<p>We need to be properly liberal, and understand that our message must be to give people the opportunities to help themselves.  That&#8217;s a left wing position if ever I heard one, it&#8217;s certainly opposed to the established governance tendencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antony_hook</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13996</link>
		<dc:creator>antony_hook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 23:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13996</guid>
		<description>Geoff is not &quot;pro-establishment&quot; and even less &quot;finding fame and fortune.&quot;

I knew this wasn&#039;t by written by Geoff because he never starts sentence with prepositions or conjunctions.  You notice things like that about your friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff is not &#8220;pro-establishment&#8221; and even less &#8220;finding fame and fortune.&#8221;</p>
<p>I knew this wasn&#8217;t by written by Geoff because he never starts sentence with prepositions or conjunctions.  You notice things like that about your friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13992</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 22:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13992</guid>
		<description>&quot;So I am the anti-establishment Geoff Payne, not the pro-establishment one who is currently finding fame and fortune in the party.&quot;

Clearly you don&#039;t know Geoff Payne.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So I am the anti-establishment Geoff Payne, not the pro-establishment one who is currently finding fame and fortune in the party.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clearly you don&#8217;t know Geoff Payne.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13974</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 17:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13974</guid>
		<description>I will feedback on the naysayers. Interesting point made by Rob about the SNP taxcutting agenda, I was not aware of that. Maybe their model of the Republic of Ireland? In which case, I wonder how they will get on with the Greens.
In response to Peter and Graeme - remember that at the last conference there was talk of the Lib Dems finishing in second. It is easy to make up a different storey after the event.
And to Tristan, if there was any demand for free market party in Scotland, it would have been the Tories and not the SNP who would have made the advance. Positioning the Lib Dems to the right of the Tories does not seem sensible, particularly in Scotland of all places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will feedback on the naysayers. Interesting point made by Rob about the SNP taxcutting agenda, I was not aware of that. Maybe their model of the Republic of Ireland? In which case, I wonder how they will get on with the Greens.<br />
In response to Peter and Graeme &#8211; remember that at the last conference there was talk of the Lib Dems finishing in second. It is easy to make up a different storey after the event.<br />
And to Tristan, if there was any demand for free market party in Scotland, it would have been the Tories and not the SNP who would have made the advance. Positioning the Lib Dems to the right of the Tories does not seem sensible, particularly in Scotland of all places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13971</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13971</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that I thought my alias would appear rather than my actual name. So I am the anti-establishment Geoff Payne, not the pro-establishment one who is currently finding fame and fortune in the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that I thought my alias would appear rather than my actual name. So I am the anti-establishment Geoff Payne, not the pro-establishment one who is currently finding fame and fortune in the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tristan</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13964</link>
		<dc:creator>tristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13964</guid>
		<description>If the LibDems and SNP are virtually indistinguishable except on independence then I&#039;d suggest the LibDems need to look at their policies and see how liberal they are.

The SNP are a social democratic party, not a liberal party.

One of my criticisms of the LibDems in Scotland is they seem to be a social democratic party and don&#039;t offer much different from the other 2 main parties in Scotland.
Perhaps its time to take a step back, look at policies and think will this reduce government power? Will this free people to live their lives as they wish without interference? Will this let people make their own choices about how they live and how they spend their own money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the LibDems and SNP are virtually indistinguishable except on independence then I&#8217;d suggest the LibDems need to look at their policies and see how liberal they are.</p>
<p>The SNP are a social democratic party, not a liberal party.</p>
<p>One of my criticisms of the LibDems in Scotland is they seem to be a social democratic party and don&#8217;t offer much different from the other 2 main parties in Scotland.<br />
Perhaps its time to take a step back, look at policies and think will this reduce government power? Will this free people to live their lives as they wish without interference? Will this let people make their own choices about how they live and how they spend their own money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13951</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 13:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13951</guid>
		<description>Alison - there are two Geoffrey Paynes in the party. I&#039;m pretty sure this isn&#039;t the barrister, former Chair of LDYS and former Vice Chair of the Federal Policy Committee.  However, it does raise one point that Lib Dem Voice might want to bear in mind - including biographies of all contributers to avoid any confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alison &#8211; there are two Geoffrey Paynes in the party. I&#8217;m pretty sure this isn&#8217;t the barrister, former Chair of LDYS and former Vice Chair of the Federal Policy Committee.  However, it does raise one point that Lib Dem Voice might want to bear in mind &#8211; including biographies of all contributers to avoid any confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13950</link>
		<dc:creator>James Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 13:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13950</guid>
		<description>Alison - there are two Geoffrey Payne&#039;s in the party. I&#039;m pretty sure this isn&#039;t the barrister, former Chair of LDYS and former Vice Chair of the Federal Policy Committee.  However, it does raise one point that Lib Dem Voice might want to bear in mind - including biographies of all contributers to avoid any confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alison &#8211; there are two Geoffrey Payne&#8217;s in the party. I&#8217;m pretty sure this isn&#8217;t the barrister, former Chair of LDYS and former Vice Chair of the Federal Policy Committee.  However, it does raise one point that Lib Dem Voice might want to bear in mind &#8211; including biographies of all contributers to avoid any confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13941</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 11:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13941</guid>
		<description>There is no question that nationally, the results for the party in the Scottish Parliament elections were disappointing.

However, it is important to remember that only one party, the SNP increased their representation.  All the others, Labour, Lib Dem, Tories, Greens, Socialists, Independents, all lost out in the nationalist surge.

However, as Liberal Neil points out, there is now a pattern of different voting in Westminster and Holyrood elections.

In Edinburgh South and Edinburgh North &amp; Leith, two of our key parliamentary target seats for the General Election, we polled well, reaffirming our position in both seats as the alternative to Labour.

It was particularly encouraging for me that in the SNP&#039;s best ever election, the Lib Dems overtook the nationalists in Edinburgh North &amp; Leith with an 11% increase in vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no question that nationally, the results for the party in the Scottish Parliament elections were disappointing.</p>
<p>However, it is important to remember that only one party, the SNP increased their representation.  All the others, Labour, Lib Dem, Tories, Greens, Socialists, Independents, all lost out in the nationalist surge.</p>
<p>However, as Liberal Neil points out, there is now a pattern of different voting in Westminster and Holyrood elections.</p>
<p>In Edinburgh South and Edinburgh North &amp; Leith, two of our key parliamentary target seats for the General Election, we polled well, reaffirming our position in both seats as the alternative to Labour.</p>
<p>It was particularly encouraging for me that in the SNP&#8217;s best ever election, the Lib Dems overtook the nationalists in Edinburgh North &amp; Leith with an 11% increase in vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberal Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13939</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberal Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 10:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-why-did-the-snp-outperform-the-lib-dems-805.html#comment-13939</guid>
		<description>It looked to me like the Scots had decided it was time for a change and went for the most obvious opposition to the incumbents rather than the party that had been in coalition with them.

I suspect there is also a fair amount of differential voting between the Scottish Parliament elections and the Westminster elections and that the Lib Dems are still lined up to take more of their target seats in the general election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looked to me like the Scots had decided it was time for a change and went for the most obvious opposition to the incumbents rather than the party that had been in coalition with them.</p>
<p>I suspect there is also a fair amount of differential voting between the Scottish Parliament elections and the Westminster elections and that the Lib Dems are still lined up to take more of their target seats in the general election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

