Opinion: Why local banks need Lib Dems to act

It hardly seems worth Ed Miliband’s time to actually make the speech on economics today, because it has been previewed, leaked and debated – almost sentence by sentence – all week.

There was a debate about the middle classes on Tuesday.  Then there was the important commitment to competition in the banking sector, where he flagged the idea of a market cap, an important idea – but there are three practical problems with it.

First, there is a danger that it will lead to the big banks dumping poorer customers – though equally, there will be more banks available for them to choose from.

Second, his colleague Ed Balls has been opposed to this agenda practically since the womb, so it would be strange if he had suddenly undergone some kind of Pauline conversion.  The fear is that it will be read as a piece of Labour positioning, part of an internal power struggle, rather than a serious contribution to policy.

Third, there are other ways of achieving the same objective.  A market cap would be vulnerable to legal challenge and it would be fought through the courts by the big banks.  There are European dimensions to the whole thing.

If this was the centrepiece of Labour’s strategy, there would need to be something else in reserve – if we are going to see real diversity in the local banking market in the UK, as other countries have, and to their huge economic benefit.

For the last few months, and with the help of the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust, I was working with Baroness Kramer in the Lords (before she went into government) to develop implementable approaches to creating a new local banking infrastructure in the UK.

You can read the results here, and I hope you can – because this is crucial for the economy and political, published yesterday. It is important economically because:

•        The big banks bad at assessing and pricing the risk of lending to small businesses, and are consequently no longer geared up to do so.

•        Competitor countries have small banks.  In the UK, just 3 per cent of banks are local, 34 per cent in the USA, 33 per cent in Germany and 44 per cent in Japan (and they all have better SME track record).

•        Co-operative and savings banks reduce the drain of capital from urban centres and foster regional equality because of their ability to lend to SMEs.

•        Our lack of local banks means that our recessions are likely to be deeper than theirs, and our SMEs are at a disadvantage.

The irony is that the Lib Dems were the only party to commit to banking diversity in their 2010 manifesto.  It would be ironic if they were outflanked on their own issue by Miliband, and this is why it is important politically.

Perhaps it doesn’t matter, but to shift this particular objective it will require at least two parties committed to local banking diversity to make it happen.

It also provides Lib Dems with an answer to the question: how will you rebalance the economy and turbo-charge the recovery – the answer is that it is necessary to create an effective local lending infrastructure, able to recycle local deposits as local enterprise.

It also has the benefit of being true.

There are short-term policies we need, including hiving off more regional banks from RBS.  There are long-term policies we need to make it easier to start local banks, and to create a legal structure for a co-operative bank (still not legal in this country, the Co-op Bank is just owned by a co-op, or it was).

But the most important shift we need to make is to accept that the big banks no longer have the infrastructure for lending to small business effectively.

We would then use the postcode lending data (a Lib Dem success, recently published) to calculate what they owe to fund a local lending infrastructure to lend where they are unable to.

It would be a version of Project Merlin which actually works, and it may be possible without legislation – though the threat of legislation would help – because it offers one huge benefit to the banks: an end to the argument, once and for all, about whether they are lending enough to small business.

* David Boyle is the author of the Re-banking the UK report and of Broke: How to Survive the Middle Class Crisis (Fourth Estate).

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/37868 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Matt (Bristol) 17th Jan '14 - 11:18am

    @Geoffrey Payne: By the way I really think that Labour has moved away from the neoliberalism they believed in when they were last in office, and that includes Ed Balls. I hope we can do the same post 2015, and probably with a new leader.

    Erm. Really?

    I don’t wish to be cynical, but maybe the entreched ideological neoliberalism is in the current structure of government and service delivery (both the civil service who work up the details of policy and the contractors routinely used to ‘deliver’ those policies). Bit of a coincidence that every party with a vaguely centre-left agenda in opposition ends up shifting right when in government, don’t you think?

    But, yes, a centre-left coalition may be better at banking reform than the current centre-right one. But I think the cultureal problem with proposing genuine local banking (as with so many sensible LD proposals) is that you’re not just shifting the vgoverning culture’s fear of economic intervention and spooking ‘Big Business’, you’re trying to move in a devolutionary direction _at the same time_, another issue which our system and political culture has an inbuilt bias against.

  • Eddie Sammon 17th Jan '14 - 12:06pm

    I think Miliband’s market cap is pretty liberal. I’ve never really been in favour of concentrated power.

  • Defending the banks is never popular but a few points of fact:

    The biggest bank by market share (Lloyds) has increased its lending to SMEs in a declining market.

    Regional banks in Germany have been a disater.

    Other sectors in the UK have a much higher degree of concentration (Tescos, anyone?).

    No one can dictate who customers choose to bank with – plenty of stories of customers hived off to TSB from Lloyds choosing to go back to Lloyds because that’s who they want to bank with. Are they going to be banned from doing so?

    And it is easier than ever to switch banks (and even get paid for doing so).

  • It would seem that the link David Boyle provides in the article to the results of the work with Baroness Kramer that refers to Hansard, should in fact refer to this article: http://www.newweather.org/projects/how-to-re-bank-the-uk-effectively/

    Given that the above article seems to be a rework of his blog article http://davidboyle.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/how-to-go-about-rebanking-uk.html

  • Robert Wootton 21st Jan '14 - 11:16pm

    If parties are serious about increasing competition in the banking sector then the government should follow the New Zealand governments example and repeal all the Banking legislation. They did this in the 1990s and introduced a more rational legislation a few years later.

  • David Evans 22nd Jan '14 - 2:21am

    That would be a very courageous thing to do!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarHugh 22nd Dec - 8:54pm
    @ Tony "The British Medical Association, for a long time the most powerful trades union in the UK, has always insisted on there being a...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 22nd Dec - 8:29pm
    People say the LibDem demographic is skewed in some respects, such as the gender balance. Is this "normal"? Are there class or income-band biases too,...
  • User AvatarStephen W 22nd Dec - 7:53pm
    They promised the referendum would be once in a lifetime. Within a couple of months they are demanding another referendum. What's that about keeping their...
  • User AvatarGraham Evans 22nd Dec - 7:52pm
    I have not seen any statistics on the subject, but I would surmise that the main difference between overseas graduates who pay much higher fees...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 22nd Dec - 7:47pm
    I think this is fine, as long as people don't have unrealistic expectations for businesses. A lot of businesses simply want what feels like a...
  • User AvatarDavid Howell 22nd Dec - 7:13pm
    Stephen W. Care to tell us why the SNP have quadrupled their membership since the referendum if what you say is so? Could it be...
Wed 31st Dec 2014
Sat 3rd Jan 2015
Wed 14th Jan 2015
Thu 15th Jan 2015
Fri 16th Jan 2015