Opinion: My taxpayer funded Euro jaunt was well worth it

I seldom hear much enthusiasm about European politics. It seems particularly difficult to get people excited about the EU and during the Euro list selection campaign, I found that even politically active people were largely uninterested in European issues. It is hardly surprising, then, that the UK turnout in 2009 was less than 35%.

One attempt to tackle this problem comes from the EU in the form of subsidies offered to MEPs who bring visitors from their constituencies to see the European Parliament. I was lucky enough to join one of these trips last week and I found it to be really enjoyable and informative. Not only did we get a chance to look around the European Parliament, but we were also told how the various institutions work and what they do as well as getting a chance to ask all our questions. During the three days we spent in snowy Brussels, we covered topics such as the history of the EU, the Eurozone crisis, the CAP, Scottish Independence, the work of an MEP and their staff, the Single Seat campaign, the budget and many, many more.

The subsidies have been criticised by the press as taxpayer-funded holidays but I welcome them as an effective way to educate activists and to stimulate more campaign activity back home. I also encourage party members to get in touch with their MEPs about joining one of these trips because not only did our group have a fantastic time, but we all left feeling much more informed about what happens in Brussels and ready to take pro-EU messages to the doorstep which, in turn, could help generate more interest amongst the public.

Rather than slating the subsidies that allow us to go and learn more about the European Parliament, would we not be better served looking at why they are needed in the first place? It was the view of our guide that the UK electorate don’t understand enough about the European Union to be interested. He considered the problem to be largely down to the press but if Euroscepticism sells, how can we blame the media for churning out so much of it?

The Liberal Democrats are best placed to campaign on Europe and, as a pro-European party, we should be leading the way on positive European campaigns, especially in Scotland where our relationship with Europe is very topical through the Independence debate. I hope that the energy we generate north of the border will gather enough momentum to travel south and start to excite the electorate ahead of 2014 because it is my view that the recent successes of UKIP are no doubt more down to a misinformed public than a genuine appetite to leave the European Union.

* Jade Holden is a European list candidate for Scotland and blogs at Misinformed Musings. Today is her birthday.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32130 for Twitter and emails.

5 Comments

  • “Rather than slating the subsidies that allow us to go and learn more about the European Parliament”

    You don’t need to actually go to Brussels to learn more about the European Parliament. And if they were necessary then surely a European Parliamentary candidate isn’t exactly in the target demographic!

    If there are going to be subsidised trips then they need handing out through a better method than allowing sitting MEPs to use them to further secure their reselection prospects.

  • Richard Dean 12th Dec '12 - 7:21pm

    Could this be arranged for teenagers too, as a school trip for example? And would it be possible to use virtual reality technology to let more people have these minds of experiences? We need to be educating people about Europe and its history and institutions from an early age, essentially at the same time as we educate them about British history and institutions.

  • Jonathan Webber 13th Dec '12 - 8:00am

    Congratulations on your visit to Brussels – despite the carping above a visit does make a difference in understanding how it all works. I am working with our West Midlands MEP’s office to arrange a couple of visits next year – and I am grateful that such visits are supported as it enables all our members from across the region, irrespective of their personal circumstances, to take advantage of the visit should they so choose.

  • Thanks for this Jade – and happy birthday, btw! I used to work for an MEP many moons ago and organised a few of these trips (and accompanied the groups too; I was UK-based); they are a real eye-opener for people … making the whole thing very real for them. I’d join Jade in encouraging people to try to get on them.

  • “nd I am grateful that such visits are supported as it enables all our members from across the region, irrespective of their personal circumstances, to take advantage of the visit should they so choose.”

    It doesn’t because (a) there is no way this could be offered to all our members and (b) I’ve never seen them being promoted as free trips. When my MEP did them the cost was around £200 IIRC.

    I knew a Stuart who worked for an MEP. She organised a trip to Brussels for 8-10th March 2010 which didn’t suggest a particularly good grasp of the priorities that the Party should have had at that time :-)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User Avatararnieg 1st Aug - 4:33pm
    I think the income in advance may relate to Conference Office activity - bookings taken for the following March's Spring conference. I understand last year...
  • User AvatarRob Parsons 1st Aug - 4:29pm
    I haven't said anywhere that free trade is wrong. But free trade works where information is free as well as the trade. Dispute settlement may...
  • User AvatarJennie 1st Aug - 4:19pm
    Whereas repeatedly abusing Caron and the rest of the LDV team in the comments to this and other articles is perfectly permissible under your definition...
  • User AvatarGF 1st Aug - 4:11pm
    Charles Kennedy is absolutely right; the USP provides a vital cross-subsidy from urban to rural areas without which the latter would become dangerously isolated. The...
  • User AvatarSimon McGrath 1st Aug - 3:50pm
    Oh dear. Almost everything in this piece is wrong. The benefits of free trade are pretty well know and it is absurd to say that...
  • User AvatarRoland 1st Aug - 3:39pm
    >" The only justification for it is security of supply" Fracking fails spectacularly at that test: totally insufficient reserves have been discovered to make any...