Parliamentary Party table motion to trigger General Election

Menzies Campbell:

“Before the last General Election Tony Blair pledged to serve a full third term and the British electorate voted for him on this basis.

“Now the Prime Minister is leaving it is only right that the British public have their say on who will be their next Prime Minister.

“Today my colleagues and I have submitted a motion to trigger a general election.”

More

Share:
This entry was posted in News and tagged . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/797 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

16 Comments

  • Liam
    Posted 10th May 2007 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    I think Ming may have to think this one through…

    John Major’s takeover was not greeted by calls for a general election – maybe it should have been – but as long as the UK does not have a major change in the way it carries electoral administration there is very little the LibDems, or anyone else, can do with such “triggers”.

    Secondly, and this may be a minor point but still valid, is the requirement for Parliament to approve the Bounday Commission for England’s proposals for boundary changes prior to the next election. This has already happened with the Welsh proposals, but if any election is called without the changes being approved for England, I can forsee a lot of trouble for a lot of people from PPCs down to leaflet droppers.

  • Posted 10th May 2007 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Whilst Blair said he would stand for a full term, I’m pretty sure everyone knew that to mean he was retiring after 10 years as Prime Minster.
    I’m also sure that everyone expected Gordon Brown to take over, so a vote for Labour in 2005 was for a Blair/Brown PM.
    However if Gordon doesn’t win/stand, it could be a different question.

  • Rosemary
    Posted 10th May 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Very interesting………. How will the Tories respond to this? Will they fall into line behind the Lib Dems? Or will they come to the rescue of the Labour Party, as they usually do?

    I see this as a very cunning trap. Well done, somebody.

  • Tankus
    Posted 10th May 2007 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    Surprised …considering Mings “mixed bag” !

    Perhaps he thinks its downhill from here , so get in quick and at least retain a few seats.

  • Hywel Morgan
    Posted 10th May 2007 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    “I think Ming may have to think this one through…”

    Is the party ready for a general election in 4 weeks time? A number of campaigns staff are on (deserved) holidays after the local/Scottish/Welsh elections.

    The party website lists 88 selected candidates and I suspect very few flying start leaflets are printed! :-)

  • Bridget Fox
    Posted 10th May 2007 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    A very smart way to get some of the coverage on Blair day, and to catch the Tories hopping.

  • Hywel Morgan
    Posted 10th May 2007 at 5:00 pm | Permalink

    It is that Bridget. Provided Labour don’t say “You know Ming you’ve made a very good case and we quite agree. June 12th it is then” :-)

  • Cheltenham Robin
    Posted 10th May 2007 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    This is a pathetic stunt that makes us look childish.

    The Labour Party was elected to govern, It is their choice as to when the election should be.

  • nigelashton
    Posted 11th May 2007 at 12:04 am | Permalink

    I think it is bloody stupid gesture politics of the worst sort and it does us no good at all.

  • Dexter
    Posted 11th May 2007 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    Given that the Queens Progagitive is to appoint the leader of the largest party in the Commons to be her Prime Minister a motion being put down to urge the Queen to desolve Parliament may in fact exceed her own generally accepted powers.

  • Graeme
    Posted 11th May 2007 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Meanwhile, in the real world where people aren’t generally au fait with the ins and outs of parliamentary procedure, most people agree that there should be a general election.

  • Dexter
    Posted 11th May 2007 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    I am unsure what “full-term” may mean in a country without fixed term Parliaments. I don’t see people protesting in the streets and calling for a general elction now or soon. I don’t even think any opinion polls have concluded that either. This is a ridiculous tactic for a party opposed to Presidential style politics to be taking.

  • Graeme
    Posted 11th May 2007 at 1:07 pm | Permalink
  • Hywel Morgan
    Posted 11th May 2007 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    “Given that the Queens Progagitive is to appoint the leader of the largest party in the Commons to be her Prime Minister”

    AIUI the Queen can ask anyone to become PM if they can show they can command a majority in the Commons.

    I’d take the other view – if Brown calls a snap election we should oppose a dissolution as he still has a comfortable majority and some time to run.

  • Tory Lady
    Posted 11th May 2007 at 8:54 pm | Permalink

    An excellent move by Ming. I do not think the Conservatives will push. They are not ready for the winning steak, if they were successful in calling the bluff.

  • Liam
    Posted 14th May 2007 at 10:41 am | Permalink

    Let’s wait for the boundary changes to be passed through parliament first :)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?